Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:46:34.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOPOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF STABLE GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2014

LUDOMIR NEWELSKI
LUDOMIR NEWELSKI*
Affiliation:
INSTYTUT MATEMATYCZNY UNIWERSYTET WROCŁAWSKI PL. GRUNWALDZKI 2/4 50-384 WROCŁAW, POLANDE-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assume G is a group definable in a model M of a stable theory T. We prove that the semigroup SG (M) of complete G-types over M is an inverse limit of some semigroups type-definable in Meq. We prove that the maximal subgroups of SG (M) are inverse limits of some definable quotients of subgroups of G. We consider the powers of types in the semigroup SG (M) and prove that in a way every type in SG (M) is profinitely many steps away from a type in a subgroup of SG (M).

Keywords

Stable groupstopological dynamicsEllis semigroup
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 1199 - 1223
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Symbolic Logic 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auslander, J., Minimal flows and their extensions, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Lectures on topological dynamics, Benjamin, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Gismatullin, J., Penazzi, D., and Pillay, A., On compactifications and the topological dynamics of definable groups. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 165 (2014), pp. 552—562.Google Scholar
Harnik, V., A two-cardinal theorem for sets of formulas in a stable theory. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 21 (1975), pp. 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrushovski, E. and Loeser, F., Nonarchimedean tame topology and stably dominated types, preprint, 2012, arXiv:1009.0252.Google Scholar
Hrushovski, E. and Pillay, A., Weakly normal groups, In Logic Colloquium’85 (Orsay, 1985), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 122, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 233–244.Google Scholar
Kowalski, P., Stable groups and algebraic groups. Journal of London Mathematical Society, vol. 61 (2000), pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
Lachlan, A., A property of stable theories. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 77 (1972), pp. 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newelski, L., Some independence results for uncountable superstable theories. Isreal Journal of Mathematics, vol. 65 (1989), pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
Newelski, L., More on locally atomic models. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 136 (1990), pp. 21–26.Google Scholar
Newelski, L., On type-definable subgroups of a stable group. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 32 (1991), pp. 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newelski, L., Topological dynamics of definable group actions, this JOURNAL, vol. 74 (2009), pp. 50–72.Google Scholar
Newelski, L., Model-theoretic aspects of Ellis semigroup. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 190 (2012), pp. 477–507.Google Scholar
Newelski, L., Bounded orbits and strongly generic sets. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 86 (2012), pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
Pillay, A., Geometric stability theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevrin, L., Epigroups, In The Concise Handbook of Algebra (Mikhalev, A. and Pilz, G., editors), Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar