Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:03:18.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ramsey-like cardinals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Victoria Gitman
Victoria Gitman*
Affiliation:
New York City College of Technology (CUNY), 300 Jay Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the numerous characterizations of a Ramsey cardinal κ involves the existence of certain types of elementary embeddings for transitive sets of size κ satisfying a large fragment of ZFC. We introduce new large cardinal axioms generalizing the Ramsey elementary embeddings characterization and show that they form a natural hierarchy between weakly compact cardinals and measurable cardinals. These new axioms serve to further our knowledge about the elementary embedding properties of smaller large cardinals, in particular those still consistent with V = L.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 519 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cummings, J., Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings, Handbook of set theory (Foreman, M. and Kanamori, A., editors), Springer, New York, 2010, pp. 775–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Devlin, K. J., Constructibility, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer–Verlag, New York, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dodd, A. J., The core model, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 61, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Feng, Q., A hierarchy of Ramsey cardinals, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 49 (1990), no. 3, pp. 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Gaifman, H., Elementary embeddings of models of set-theory and certain subtheories, Axiomatic set theory (Proceedings of the Symposium on Pure Mathematics, vol. XIII, part II, University of California, Los Angeles, California, 1967), American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1974, pp. 33–101.Google Scholar
[6]Gitman, V. and Johnstone, T., Indestructibility for Ramsey-like cardinals, in preparation, 2010.Google Scholar
[7]Gitman, V. and Welch, P. D., Ramsey-like cardinals II, this Journal, vol. 76 (2011), no. 2, pp. 541–560.Google Scholar
[8]Hamkins, J. D., Forcing and large cardinals, manuscript, 2007.Google Scholar
[9]Jech, T., Set theory, third ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
[10]Kanamori, A., The higher infinite, second ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
[11]Kleinberg, E. M., A combinatorial characterization of normal M-ultrafilters, Advances in Mathematics, vol. 30 (1978), no. 2, pp. 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kunen, K., Some applications of iterated ultrapowers in set theory, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 1 (1970), pp. 179–227.Google Scholar
[13]Mitchell, W. J., Ramsey cardinals and constructibility, this Journal, vol. 44 (1979), no. 2, pp. 260–266.Google Scholar
[14]Welch, P. D. and Sharpe, I., Greatly Erdős cardinals and some generalizations to the Chang and Ramsey properties, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, to appear.Google Scholar