Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:29:52.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Propositional logic based on the dynamics of belief

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Peter Gärdenfors*
Affiliation:
Filosofiska Institutionen, Lunds Universitet, S-223 50 Lund, Sweden

Extract

In this article propositions will be identified with a certain kind of changes of belief. The intended interpretation is that a proposition is characterised by the change it would induce if added to a state of belief. Propositions will thus be defined as functions from states of belief to states of belief. A set of postulates concerning the properties and existence of propositions will be formulated. A proposition will be said to be a tautology iff it is the identity function on states of belief. The main result is that the logic determined by the set of postulates is intuitionistic propositional logic.

The basic epistemic concept is that of a belief model, which is defined as a pair 〈, 〉, where is a nonempty set and is a class of functions from to . The elements in will be called states of belief and they will be denoted K, K′,…. A discussion of the epistemological interpretation of the states of belief can be found in Gärdenfors [2]. Here, no assumptions about the structure of the elements in will be made.

The elements in will be called propositions, and A, B, C, … will be used as variables over . Functions from states of belief to states of belief can be characterised as epistemic inputs. The intended interpretation of the functions in is that they correspond to changes of belief where the new evidence is accepted as “certain” or “known” in the resulting state of belief. This means that not all functions defined on can properly be called propositions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Fitting, M.C., Intuitionistic logic, model theory and forcing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969.Google Scholar
[2]Gärdenfors, P., Dynamics of belief as a basis for logic, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 35 (1984), pp. 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Goldblatt, R., Topoi: The categorial analysis of logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.Google Scholar
[4]Rasiowa, H. and Sikorski, R., The mathematics of metamathematics, 2nd ed., PWN, Warsaw, 1968.Google Scholar