Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:35:05.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

P-ideal dichotomy and weak squares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Dilip Raghavan
Dilip Raghavan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada, E-mail: [email protected], URL: http://www.math.toronto.edu/raghavan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We answer a question of Cummings and Magidor by proving that the P-ideal dichotomy of Todorčević refutes □κ,ω for any uncountable κ. We also show that the P-ideal dichotomy implies the failure of □κ,<b provided that cf(κ) > ω1.

Keywords

P-ideal dichotomyweak square principleAronszajn tree
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 157 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cummings, J. and Magidor, M., Martin's maximum and weak square, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 139 (2011), pp. 3339–3348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Moore, J. T., Set mapping reflection, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (2005), no. 1, pp. 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Schimmerling, E., A finite family weak square principle, this Journal, vol. 64 (1999), no. 3, pp. 1087–1110.Google Scholar
[4]Sharon, A., MRP and square principles, preprint, 2006.Google Scholar
[5]Todorčević, S., A note on the proper forcing axiom, Axiomatic set theory (Boulder, Colo., 1983), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1984, pp. 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Todorčević, S., A dichotomy for P-ideals of countable sets, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 166 (2000), no. 3, pp. 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Todorčević, S., Walks on ordinals and their characteristics, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 263, Birkháuser Verlag, Basel, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Todorčević, S., Combinatorial dichotomies in set theory, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 17 (2011), no. 1, pp. 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar