Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:12:29.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partial realizations of Hilbert's program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Stephen G. Simpson
Stephen G. Simpson*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

§0. Introduction. What follows is a write-up of my contribution to the symposium “Hilbert's Program Sixty Years Later” which was sponsored jointly by the American Philosophical Association and the Association for Symbolic Logic. The symposium was held on December 29,1985 in Washington, D. C. The panelists were Solomon Feferman, Dag Prawitz and myself. The moderator was Wilfried Sieg. The research which I discuss here was partially supported by NSF Grant DMS-8317874.

I am grateful to the organizers of this timely symposium on an important topic. As a mathematician I particularly value the opportunity to address an audience consisting largely of philosophers. It is true that I was asked to concentrate on the mathematical aspects of Hilbert's program. But since Hilbert's program is concerned solely with the foundations of mathematics, the restriction to mathematical aspects is really no restriction at all.

Hilbert assigned a special role to a certain restricted kind of mathematical reasoning known as finitistic. The essence of Hilbert's program was to justify all of set-theoretical mathematics by means of a reduction to finitism. It is now well known that this task cannot be carried out. Any such possibility is refuted by Gödel's theorem. Nevertheless, recent research has revealed the feasibility of a significant partial realization of Hilbert's program. Despite Gödel's theorem, one can give a finitistic reduction for a substantial portion of infinitistic mathematics including many of the best-known nonconstructive theorems. My purpose here is to call attention to these modern developments.

Type
Survey/Expository Papers
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 349 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bernays, P., Hilbert, David, Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Edwards, P., editor), Vol. 3, Macmillan and Free Press, New York, 1967, pp. 496–504.Google Scholar
[2] Brown, D. K., Functional analysis in weak subsystems of second-order arithmetic, Ph.D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa., 1987.Google Scholar
[3] Brown, D. K. and Simpson, S. G., Which set existence axioms are needed to prove the separable Hahn-Banach theorem?, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 31 (1986), pp. 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Corcoran, J., Review of [17], Mathematical Reviews 82c :03013.Google Scholar
[5] Feferman, S., Systems of predicative analysis. I, II, this Journal, vol. 29 (1964), pp. 1–30; vol. 33 (1968), pp. 193–220.Google Scholar
[6] Friedman, H., Systems of second order arithmetic with restricted induction. I, II (abstracts), this Journal, vol. 41 (1976), pp. 557–559.Google Scholar
[7] Friedman, H., personal communication to L. Harrington, 1977.Google Scholar
[8] Friedman, H., Simpson, S. G. and Smith, R. L., Countable algebra and set existence axioms, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 25 (1983), pp. 141–181; addendum, vol. 28 (1985), pp. 319–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Gödel, K., On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems. I, translated by van Heijenoort, J., [27], pp. 596–616.Google Scholar
[10] Gödel, K., Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte Erweiterung des finiten Standpunktes, Dialectica, vol. 12 (1958), pp. 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Gödel, K., What is Cantor's continuum problem?, Philosophy of mathematics: selected readings, 2nd ed. (Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H., editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 470–485.Google Scholar
[12] Harrington, L., personal communication to H. Friedman, 1977.Google Scholar
[13] Hilbert, D., On the infinite, translated by Bauer-Mengelberg, S., [27], pp. 367–392.Google Scholar
[14] Hilbert, D., The foundations of mathematics, translated by Bauer-Mengelberg, S. and Føllesdal, D., [27], pp. 464–479.Google Scholar
[15] Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P., Grundlagen der Mathematik. Vols. I, II, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1968, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Kitcher, P.. Hubert's epistemology, Philosophy of Science, vol. 43 (1976), pp. 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Kline, M., Mathematics: the loss of certainty, Oxford University Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
[18] Lear, J., Aristotelian infinity, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series), vol. 80 (1980), pp. 187–210.Google Scholar
[19] Parsons, C., On a number-theoretic choice schema and its relation to induction, Intuitionism and proof theory (Myhill, J. et al., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, pp. 459–473.Google Scholar
[20] Sieg, W., Fragments of arithmetic, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 28 (1985), pp. 33–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Simpson, S. G., Which set existence axioms are needed to prove the Cauchy/Peano theorem for ordinary differential equations?, this Journal, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 783–802.Google Scholar
[22] Simpson, S. G., Friedman's research on subsystems of second order arithmetic, Harvey Friedman's research in the foundations of mathematics (Harrington, L. et al., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Simpson, S. G., Subsystems of Z2 and reverse mathematics, appendix to G. Takeuti, Proof theory, 2nd ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 432–446.Google Scholar
[24] Simpson, S. G., Subsystems of second order arithmetic (in preparation).Google Scholar
[25] Tait, W. W., Finitism, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 78 (1981), pp. 524–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Takeuti, G., Recent topics on proof theory (in Japanese), Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, vol. 17 (1984), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[27] Van Heijenoort, J. (editor), From Frege to Godel: a source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.Google Scholar
[28] Wigner, E. P., The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13 (1960), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar