No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A partial model of NF with E
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2014
Abstract
Partial models of the theory New Foundations (NF) introduced by Quine have already appeared in the literature, but in every model the membership set of NF is missing. On the other hand, Jensen showed that “NF + Urelements” is consistent with respect to ZF and, in the model built there, the membership set of the theory exists, Here we build a partial model of NF from the one of Jensen in which the membership set exists.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1994
References
REFERENCES
[Be]Benes, V. E., A partial model of Quine's “New Foundations”, this Journal, vol. 19 (1954), pp. 197–200.Google Scholar
[B1]Boffa, M., The consistency problem for NF, this Journal, vol. 42 (1977), pp. 215–220.Google Scholar
[B3]Boffa, M., La théorie de type et NF, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de Belgique, Serie A, vol. XXXIII (1981), pp. 21–31.Google Scholar
[B4]Boffa, M., The consistency of ZF + NF3, Mathematische Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach, Tagungsbericht, no. 9 (1987).Google Scholar
[B-C]Boffa, M. and Casalegno, P., The consistency of some 4-stratified subsystem of NF including NF3, this Journal, vol. 50 (1985). pp. 407–411.Google Scholar
[G]Grishin, V. N., The equivalence of Quine's NF system to a fragment of it, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistic (1972), pp. 15–19; English translation of a paper in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Series 2, vol. 6 (1972), no. 1, pp. 22–24.Google Scholar
[J]Jensen, R. B., On the consistency of a slight (?) modification of Quine's New Foundations, Synthese, vol. 19 (1968/1969), pp. 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[L]Lake, J., Some topics on set theory, Ph.D. Thesis, Bedford College, London University, London, 1974.Google Scholar
[P]Prati, N., A partial model of NF with ZF, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 39 (1993), pp. 274–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Q]Quine, W. V., New foundations for mathematical logic, American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 44 (1937), pp. 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[S]Specker, E., Typical ambiguity, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Nagel, E.et al., editors), Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1962, pp. 116–124.Google Scholar