Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:20:57.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the interpretation of combinators with weak reduction1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

L.V. Shabunin
L.V. Shabunin*
Affiliation:
Chuvashsky State University, Cheboksary, USSR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper some partial models for combinators with weak reduction are proposed. The underlying ideas are due to Church [1]. The results are extensions of the previous results of the author proved in [8].

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 558 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

(Note by Jonathan P. Seldin.) This is a revised version of a paper submitted in May, 1979 for publication in To H.B. Curry: Essays in Combinatory Logic, Lambda-Calculus, and Formalism, edited by Roger Hindley and me, Academic Press, London, 1980. At the end of May, 1979, I found an error in Lemma 2.7 of §4 of [8] and wrote to the author about it. The error turns out to be easily repaired (see footnote 4 below), but unfortunately at the time I wrote the author was in the process of moving to Moscow for six months, and so my letter did not reach him until November, 1979, and by that time a deadline set by the publishers had forced us to decide on the final contents of the book before receiving a reply from the author, and as a result this paper did not appear in the book.

References

REFERENCES

[1]Church, Alonzo, The calculi of lambda-conversion, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1941.Google Scholar
[2]Curry, H.B. and Feys, R., Combinatory logic. Vol. I, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1958.Google Scholar
[3]Curry, H.B., Hindley, J.R., and Seldin, J.P., Combinatory logic. Vol. II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1972.Google Scholar
[4]Curry, H.B., The undecidability of λK-conversion, Foundations of mathematics (Bulloff, J.J., Holyoke, T.C., and Hahn, S.W., editors), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1969, pp. 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kearns, J.T., The completeness of combinatory logic with discriminators, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 14 (1973), pp. 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Rogers, H., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[7]Shabunin, L.V., A variant of combinatory logic with discriminators, Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Serlya I: Matematika, Mekhanlka, vol. 27 (1972), no. 4,pp. 53–58; English translation, Moscow University Matematlcs Bulletin, vol. 27 (1972), no. 3/4, pp. 115–120.Google Scholar
[8]Shabunin, L.V., An interpretation of α-words connected with simple combinatorial calculi, Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya I: Matematika, Mekhanlka, vol. 30 (1975), no. 6, pp. 3–9, and vol. 31 (1976),no. 1, 12–17; English translation, Moscow University Mathematics Bulletin,vol. 30 (1975), no. 5/6, pp. 55–60, and vol. 31 (1976), no. 1/2, pp. 9–14.Google Scholar