Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:24:04.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On partitions of the real line into compact sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Ludomir Newelski*
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 51-617 Wrocław, Poland

Extract

The problem mentioned in the title has already been investigated by J. Baumgartner, J. Stern, A. Miller and many others (see [2] and [5]). We prove here some generalizations of theorems of Miller and Stern from [2] and [5]. We use standard set-theoretical notation. Let

One can check that in the above definition we can replace “compact subset of ωω” by “closed nowhere dense subset of ω2” or “Fσ and meager subset of ω2” (as any Fσ subset of ω2 can be presented as a disjoint countable union of compact sets).

For functions f, g ϵ ωω we define fg if for all but finitely many n ϵ ω we have f(n)g(n). Let denote the least cardinality of a family Aωω such that for any f ϵ ωω there is g ϵ A for which fg. It is easy to see that κωκ1. If f ϵ ωω then let ≼(f) = {h ϵωω: hf}.

We find an axiom which implies = ω1κ1 = ω1, and which can be preserved by any ccc notion of forcing of “small cardinality”. We construct also in a generic model many partitions of ωω into compact sets preserved not only by any random real extension, but also by Sacks' notion of forcing. This shows that from some point of view Miller's modification of Sacks' forcing (from [2]) is the “minimal” one able to destroy a partition of ωω into compact sets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baumgartner, J., Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory (Mathias, A. R. D., editor), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 87, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 159.Google Scholar
[2]Miller, A., Covering 2ω with ω1 disjoint closed sets, The Kleene symposium (Madison, Wisconsin, 1978; Barwise, J.et al., editors), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 101, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 415421.Google Scholar
[3]Miller, A., Some properties of measure and category, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 266 (1981), pp. 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Shelah, S., Proper forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 940, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Stern, J., Partitions of the real line into ℵ1 closed sets, Higher set theory (Proceedings, Oberwolfach, 1977), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 445461.Google Scholar