Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:49:43.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the theory of quantification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Moh Shaw-Kwei*
Affiliation:
Nanking University, Nanking, China

Extract

In the paper On the logic of quantification Prof. W. V. Quine showed that for the theory of quantification we have a mechanical process to determine whether or not a monadic expression is a valid logical formula, and that to deduce the polyadic theory from the monadic theory we need only the generalized modus ponens, which reads:

If a conditional is valid, and its antecedent consists of zero or more quantifiers followed by a valid schema, then its consequent is valid, i.e.:

That we have a mechanical process to determine the validity of a monadic expression was pointed out by Löwenheim long ago; Quine's method, however, has the merit that it is very simple and hence practical. The present paper is to show that we may deduce the polyadic theory by means of only a mechanical process and the ordinary modus ponens alone, i.e., the schema,

or even by means of only the weakened modus ponens, i.e., the schema,

For, if an expression becomes monadic when we omit the initial all-quantifiers (i.e., those preceding every existence-quantifier) and regard the corresponding variables as constants, then evidently we may determine by a mechanical process whether or not it is a valid formula by examining the resulting monadic expression. For example, the expression

is of the same validity as the expression

and hence as the expression

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quine, W. V., On the logic of quantification, this Journal, vol. 10 (1945), pp. 112 Google Scholar.

2 See, for example, Hilbert, D. and Ackermann, W., Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik, 3rd edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg, p. 78 Google Scholar.

3 Berry, G. D. W., On Quine's axioms of quantification, this Journal, vol. 6 (1941), pp. 2327 Google Scholar.

4 See Quine, W. V., Mathematical logic, Second printing, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1947 Google Scholar. (In the revised edition of 1951, these axioms have the numbers 100, 101, 102, 103. Editor.)