Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:33:22.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local behaviour of the Chebyshev theorem in models of I0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Paola D'Aquino*
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3LB, England, E-mail: [email protected]

Extract

Let I0 denote the fragment of Peano arithmetic where induction is restricted only to bounded formulas (⊿0-formulas), i.e. formulas where all the quantifiers are bounded. We will examine the behaviour in I0 of Chebyshev's classical result on the distribution of primes. Chebyshev showed that each of the following functions on N is bounded by a polynomial in each of the others:

In his proof he used, as auxiliaries, factorials and binomial coefficients.

When we work in a weak system like I0 we have to deal with two problems:

(i) There is not an immediate meaning for symbols like xy, Πpxp, and x!.

(ii) Some basic functions like exponentiation, factorial, and product of primes up to a certain element, are in general only partially definable.

The first problem is equivalent to finding ⊿0-formulas representing the relations z = xy, y = Πpxp, and y = x!. While we can easily express that y is the product of all primes less than or equal to x in a ⊿0-way, it requires a subtle argument to define z = xy by a ⊿0-formula. The most natural way of expressing it is via the formalization of the Chinese remainder theorem coding the recursion procedure used in the definition of xy. But this can be expressed only via a Σ1-formula. ⊿0-definitions of exponentiation were given by Paris and Bennett (see [GD] and [B]), and all sensible definitions of this type are equivalent (see Remark 1). Later we will examine properties of such a definition E0(x, y, z). The ⊿00-definition of y = Πpxp is much more straightforward, since both the relation of being a prime and the divisibility relation are ⊿0-definable. We will give an explicit definition of it and denote it by Ψ(x, y). In this way, by a ⊿0-induction, we will be able to prove the uniqueness of the elements y and z satisfying Ψ(x, y) and E0(x, y, z), respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[B]Bennett, J. H., On spectra, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 1962.Google Scholar
[GD]Gaifman, H. and Dimitracopoulos, C., Fragments of Peano's arithmetic and the MRDP theorem, Logic and algorithmic, Monographies de L'Enseignement Mathématique, no. 30, Université de Genève, Genève, 1982, pp. 187206.Google Scholar
[HW]Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M., An introduction to the theory of numbers, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1954.Google Scholar
[P]Parikh, R., Existence and feasibility in arithmetic, this Journal, vol. 36 (1971), pp. 494508.Google Scholar
[PW1]Paris, J. and Wilkie, A., On the scheme of induction for bounded arithmetic formulas, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 35 (1987), pp. 261302.Google Scholar
[PW2]Paris, J. and Wilkie, A., Counting problems in bounded arithmetic, Methods in mathematical logic (proceedings of the sixth Latin American symposium on mathematical logic, Caracas, 1983), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1130, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, pp. 317340.Google Scholar
[PWW]Paris, J., Wilkie, A. and Woods, A., Provability of the pigeonhole principle and the existence of infinitely many primes, this Journal, vol. 53 (1988), pp. 12351244.Google Scholar
[W]Woods, A., Some problems in logic and number theory and their connections, Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, 1981.Google Scholar