Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T19:19:02.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Laczkovich-Komjáth property for coanalytic equivalence relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Su Gao ,
Steve Jackson  and
Vincent Kieftenbeld
Su Gao
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Department of Mathematics, 1155 Union Circle #311430, Denton, Tx 76203-5017, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Steve Jackson
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Department of Mathematics, 1155 Union Circle #311430, Denton, Tx 76203-5017, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Vincent Kieftenbeld
Affiliation:
University of North Texas, Department of Mathematics, 1155 Union Circle #311430, Denton, Tx 76203-5017, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let E be a coanalytic equivalence relation on a Polish space X and (An)n∈ω a sequence of analytic subsets of X. We prove that if lim supn∈kAn meets uncountably many E-equivalence classes for every K ∈ [ω]ω, then there exists K ∈ [ω]ω such that ∩n∈kAn contains a perfect set of pairwise E-inequivalent elements.

Keywords

Limit superior of a sequence of setscoanalytic equivalence relationsLaczkovich-Komjáth property
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 1091 - 1101
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Balcerzak, Marek and Gla̧b, Szymon, On the Laczkovich-Komjáth property of sigma-ideals, preprint.Google Scholar
[2]Gao, Su, Invariant descriptive set theory, Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.Google Scholar
[3]Gao, Su, Jackson, Steve, Laczkovich, Miklós, and Mauldin, R. Daniel, On the unique representation off amilies of sets, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 360 (2008), no. 2, pp. 939–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Harrington, Leo A., Kechris, Alexander S., and Louveau, Alain, A Glimm–Effros dichotomy for Borel equivalence relations, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 3 (1990), no. 4, pp. 903–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Komjáth, Peter, On the limit superior of analytic sets, Analysis Mathematica, vol. 10 (1984), no. 4, pp. 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Laczkovich, Miklós, On the limit superior of sequences of sets, Analysis Mathematica, vol. 3 (1977), no. 3, pp. 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Martin, Donald A. and Kechris, Alexander S., Infinite games and effective descriptive set theory, Analytic sets, Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
[8]Moschovakis, Yiannis N., Descriptive set theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, no. 100, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1980.Google Scholar
[9]Silver, Jack H., Counting the number of equivalence classes of Borel and coanalytic equivalence relations, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 18 (1980),no. 1, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar