Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:08:31.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A finite basis theorem for residually finite, congruence meet-semidistributive varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Ross Willard
Ross Willard*
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We derive a Mal'cev condition for congruence meet-semidistributivity and then use it to prove two theorems. Theorem A: if a variety in a finite language is congruence meet-semidistributive and residually less than some finite cardinal, then it is finitely based. Theorem B: there is an algorithm which, given m < ω and a finite algebra in a finite language, determines whether the variety generated by the algebra is congruence meet-semidistributive and residually less than m.

Keywords

equational theoryfinitely basedresidually finitevarietycongruence meet-semidistributive
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 187 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baker, K., Finite equational bases for finite algebras in a congruence-distributive equational class, Advances in Mathematics, vol. 24 (1977), pp. 207–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Baker, K. and Wang, Ju, Approximate distributive laws and finite equational bases for finite algebras in congruence-distributive varieties, Algebra Universalis, to appear.Google Scholar
[3]Czédli, G., A characterization of congruence semi-distributivity, Universal algebra and lattice theory (Proceedings of Conference, Puebla, 1982), Springer Lecture Notes, no. 1004, 1983, pp. 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Foster, A. and Pixley, A., Semi-categorical algebras II, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 85 (1964), pp. 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hobby, D. and Mckenzie, R., The structure of finite algebras, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 76 (1988), American Mathematical Society (Providence, RI).Google Scholar
[6]Jónsson, B., Congruence varieties, Appendix 3 in Grätzer, G., Universal Algebra, Second Edition, Springer-Verlag (1979).Google Scholar
[7]Jónsson, B., Algebras whose congruence lattices are distributive, Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 21 (1967), pp. 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jónsson, B., Congruence distributive varieties, Mathematica Japonica, vol. 42 (1995), pp. 353–401.Google Scholar
[9]Kalicki, J., On comparison of finite algebras, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 3, 1952, pp. 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kearnes, K. and Szendrei, Á., The relationship between two commutators, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, vol. 8 (1998), pp. 497–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kearnes, K. and Willard, R., Residuallyfinite, congruence meet-semidistributive varieties of finite type have a finite residual bound, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 127 (1999), pp. 2841–2850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Lipparini, P., A characterization of varieties with a difference term, II: Neutral = meet semidistributive, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, vol. 41 (1998), pp. 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]McKenzie, R., Para-primal varieties: A study of finite axiomatizability and definable principal congruences in locally finite varieties, Algebra Universalis, vol. 8 (1978), pp. 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]McKenzie, R., Finite equational bases for congruence modular varieties, Algebra Universalis, vol. 24 (1987), pp. 224–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]McKenzie, R., Recursive inseparability for residual bounds of finite algebras, 1995, manuscript.Google Scholar
[16]McKenzie, R., The residual bound of a finite algebra is not computable, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, vol. 6 (1996), pp. 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]McKenzie, R., The residual bounds of finite algebras, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, vol. 6 (1996), pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]McKenzie, R., Residual smallness relativized to congruence types, 1996, manuscript.Google Scholar
[19]McKenzie, R., Tarski's finite basis problem is undecidable, International Journal of Algebra and Computation, vol. 6 (1996), pp. 49–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]McNulty, G. and Willard, R., Three-element algebras behaving badly, in preparation.Google Scholar
[21]Park, R., Equational classes of non-associative ordered algebras, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, 1976.Google Scholar
[22]Taylor, W., Residually small varieties, Algebra Universalis, vol. 2 (1972), pp. 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Willard, R., Tarski's finite basis problem via A(J), Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 349 (1997), pp. 2755–2774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar