Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:15:00.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finitary sketches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

J. Adámek ,
P. T. Johnstone ,
J. A. Makowsky  and
J. Rosický
J. Adámek
Affiliation:
Institut für Theoretische Informatik, Technical University Braunschweig, Postfach 3329, 38023 Braunschweig, Germany, E-mail: [email protected]
P. T. Johnstone
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, Cambridge University, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England, E-mail: [email protected]
J. A. Makowsky
Affiliation:
Faculty of Computer Science, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel, E-mail: [email protected]
J. Rosický
Affiliation:
Department of Algebra and Geometry, Masaryk University, Janáčkovo Nám. 2A, 662 95 Brno, Czech Republic, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Finitary sketches, i.e., sketches with finite-limit and finite-colimit specifications, are proved to be as strong as geometric sketches, i.e., sketches with finite-limit and arbitrary colimit specifications. Categories sketchable by such sketches are fully characterized in the infinitary first-order logic: they are axiomatizable by σ-coherent theories, i.e., basic theories using finite conjunctions, countable disjunctions, and finite quantifications. The latter result is absolute; the equivalence of geometric and finitary sketches requires (in fact, is equivalent to) the non-existence of measurable cardinals.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 699 - 707
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Adámek, J. and Rosický, J., Locally presentable and accessible categories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Adámek, J. and Rosický, J., Finitary sketches and finitely accessible categories, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, vol. 5 (1995), pp. 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Adámek, J. and Rosický, J., On geometric and finitary sketches, Applied Categorical Structures, vol. 4 (1996), pp. 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Barr, M. and Wells, C., Category theory for computer science, Prentice Hall, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
[5]Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J., Model theory, Studies in logic, vol. 73, North-Holland, 3rd ed., 1990.Google Scholar
[6]Freyd, P., Aspects of topoi, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 7 (1972), pp. 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Johnstone, P. T., Finitary sketches and σ-coherent theories, Abstracts of C.A.E.N. workshop, 09 1994, to appear.Google Scholar
[8]Johnstone, P. T. and Wraith, G. G., Algebraic theories in toposes, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 661, Springer-Verlag, 1978, pp. 141–242.Google Scholar
[9]Keisler, H. J., Limit ultrapowers, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 107 (1963), pp. 382–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Makkai, M. and Paré, R., Accessible categories, Contemporary mathematics, vol. 104, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1990.Google Scholar
[11]Makkai, M. and Reyes, G. E., First order categorical logic, vol. 611, Springer, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Makowsky, J., Compactness, embeddings and definability, Model-theoretic logics, Springer-Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
[13]Reyes, G. E., is enough: a reduction theorem for some infinitary languages, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 705–710.Google Scholar