Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T22:51:35.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Additions and corrections to A bibliography of symbolic logic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Alonzo Church
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 3 , Issue 4: Including an Update to A Bibliography of Symbolic Logic , December 1938 , pp. 178 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 We adopt the following method of transliterating Russian: A as A, Б as B, B as V, Г as G, Д as D, E as É, Ж as Ž З as Z, И as I, as J, I as I, K as K, Л as L, M as M, H as N, O as O, Φ as P, P as R, C as S, T as T, Y as U, Ф as F, X as H, Ц as C, Ч as Č, Ш as Š, Щ as ŠČ, Ъ omitted in transliteration, Ы as Y, Ь as ′, B as Ӗ, Э as E, Ю as Ú, Я as Á, ϴ as F.

2 This book, which is not otherwise within the field of the bibliography, is included because of the appearance on pp. 107–113 of the line of thought which afterwards led to the Richard paradox (1351).

3 With the clarification of Zermelo's notion of a definite Eigenschaft and its consequent elimination as a presupposed intuitive idea, the Zermelo set theory may be said first to have attained a degree of exactness comparable to that of the system of Principia mathematica (11116, 1941). A method of doing this is indicated briefly by Fraenkel in 2692, is incorporated in a system of axioms for set theory in 2694, and later applied to the actual development of some topics in set theory in 26911. An alternative method is due to Skolem 2475, 10. And see also J. v. Neumann 2992, 5.