Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:11:38.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relation algebras of every dimension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Roger D. Maddux
Roger D. Maddux*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conjecture (1) of [Ma83] is confirmed here by the following result: if 3 ≤ α < ω, then there is a finite relation algebra of dimension α, which is not a relation algebra of dimension α + 1. A logical consequence of this theorem is that for every finite α ≥ 3 there is a formula of the form S ⊆ T (asserting that one binary relation is included in another), which is provable with α + 1 variables, but not provable with only α variables (using a special sequent calculus designed for deducing properties of binary relations).

Keywords

Logiccomplexity of proofsprovability with finitely many variablesrelation algebrasrelational basisdimension
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 1213 - 1229
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[HMT85]Henkin, L., Monk, J. D., and Tarski, A., Cylindric Algebras, Part II, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.Google Scholar
[JT51]Jónsson, Bjarni and Tarski, Alfred, Boolean algebras with operators, Part I, American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 73 (1951), pp. 891–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[JT52]Jónsson, Bjarni and Tarski, Alfred, Boolean algebras with operators, Part II, American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 74 (1952), pp. 127–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ly50]Lyndon, Roger C., The representation of relational algebras, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 51 (1950), pp. 707–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ly61]Lyndon, Roger C., Relation algebras and projective geometries, Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 8 (1961), pp. 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[McK66]McKenzie, Ralph N. W., The representation of relation algebras, Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1966.Google Scholar
[McK70]McKenzie, Ralph N. W., The representation of integral relation algebras, Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 17 (1970), pp. 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ma76]Maddux, Roger D., Some nonrepresentable relation algebras, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 23 (1976), pp. A-431, A–557.Google Scholar
[Ma78]Maddux, Roger D., Topics in relation algebras, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1978.Google Scholar
[Ma82]Maddux, Roger D., Some varieties containing relation algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 272 (1982), pp. 501–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ma83]Maddux, Roger D., A sequent calculus for relation algebras, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 25 (1983), pp. 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ma89]Maddux, Roger D., Nonfinite axiomatizability results for cylindric and relation algebras, This Journal, vol. 54, pp. 951–974.Google Scholar
[Mo61]Monk, J. Donald, Studies in cylindric algebra, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1961.Google Scholar
[Mo64]Monk, J. Donald, On representable relation algebras, Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 11 (1964), pp. 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Mo69]Monk, J. Donald, Nonfinitizability of classes of representable cylindric algebras, this Journal, vol. 34 (1969), pp. 331–343.Google Scholar