Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:55:49.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A probabilistic interpolation theorem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Douglas N. Hoover*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Extract

The probability logic is a logic with a natural interpretation on probability spaces (thus, a logic whose model theory is part of probability theory rather than a system for putting probabilities on formulas of first order logic). Its exact definition and basic development are contained in the paper [3] of H. J. Keisler and the papers [1] and [2] of the author. Building on work in [2], we prove in this paper the following probabilistic interpolation theorem for .

Let L be a countable relational language, and let A be a countable admissible set with ω ∈ A (in this paper some probabilistic notation will be used, but ω will always mean the least infinite ordinal). is the admissible fragment of corresponding to A. We will assume that L is a countable set in A, as is usual in practice, though all that is in fact needed for our proof is that L be a set in A which is wellordered in A.

Theorem. Let ϕ(x) and ψ(x) be formulas of LAP such that

where ε ∈ [0, 1) is a real in A (reals may be defined in the usual way as Dedekind cuts in the rationals). Then for any real d > ε¼, there is a formula θ(x) of (L(ϕ) ∩ L(ψ))AP such that

and

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Hoover, Douglas N., Probability logic, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 14 (1978), pp. 287313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hoover, Douglas N., A normal form theorem for , with applications, this Journal, vol. 43 (1982), pp. 605624.Google Scholar
[3]Keisler, H. Jerome, Hyperfinite model theory, Logic Colloquium '76 (Gandy, R. O. and Hyland, J. M. E., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 5110.Google Scholar