Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:34:55.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Abacus logic: The lattice of quantum propositions as the poset of a theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Othman Qasim Malhas*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
*
Department of Mathematics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract

With a certain graphic interpretation in mind, we say that a function whose value at every point in its domain is a nonempty set of real numbers is an Abacus. It is shown that to every collection C of abaci there corresponds a logic, called an abacus logic, i.e.. a certain set of propositions partially ordered by generalized implication. It is also shown that to every collection C of abaci there corresponds a theory Jc in a classical propositional calculus such that the abacus logic determined by C is isomorphic to the poset of Jc. Two examples are given. In both examples abacus logic is a lattice in which there happens to be an operation of orthocomplementation. In the first example abacus logic turns out to be the Lindenbaum algebra of Jc. In the second example abacus logic is a lattice isomorphic to the ortholattice of subspaces of a Hilbert space. Thus quantum logic can be regarded as an abacus logic. Without suggesting “hidden variables” it is finally shown that the Lindenbaum algebra of the theory in the second example is a subalgebra of the abacus logic B of the kind studied in example 1. It turns out that the “classical observables” associated with B and the “quantum observables” associated with quantum logic are not unrelated. The value of a classical observable contains, in coded form, information about the “uncertainty” of a quantum observable. This information is retrieved by decoding the value of the corresponding classical observable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Varadarajan, V. S., Geometry of Quantum Theory, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
[2] Malhas, O. Q., this Journal, vol. 52 (1987), p. 834.Google Scholar
[3] Malhas, O. Q., International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 31 (1992), p. 1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Jauch, M., Foundations of quantum mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1968.Google Scholar