Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:48:45.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Islam and Muslims in the Southern Territories of the Philippine Islands During the American Colonial Period (1898 to 1946)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Howard M. Federspiel
Howard M. Federspiel
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The United States gained authority over the Philippine Islands as a result of the Spanish-American War (1898) and the Treaty of Paris (1899), which recognized American wartime territorial gains. Prior to that time the Spanish had general authority over the northern region of the Islands down to the Visayas, which they had ruled from their capital at Manila on Luzon for nearly three hundred years. The population in that Spanish zone was Christianized as a product of deliberate Spanish policy during that time frame. The area to the south, encompassing much of the island of Mindanao and all of the Sulu Archipelago, was under Spanish military control at the time of the Spanish American War (1898), having been taken over in the previous fifteen years by a protracted military campaign. This southern territory was held by the presence of Spanish military units in a series of strong forts located throughout the settled areas, but clear control over the society was quite weak and, in fact, collapsed after the American naval victory at Manila Bay. The United States did not establish its own presence in much of the southern region until 1902. It based its claim over the region on the treaty with the Spanish, and other colonial powers recognized that claim as legitimate.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , September 1998 , pp. 340 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gowing, Peter G., Mandate in Moroland: The American Government of Muslim Filipinos 1899–1920 (Quezon City: New Day Publishers, 1983), ch. 1Google Scholar; William E. W. McKinley, “A Brief Summary of Historical Accounts respecting the Spanish Military Operations against the Moros from the Year 1578 to 1898” (A report compiled for Major General George W. Davis, Commanding the Division of the Philippines, Manila, Military Information Division, Headquarters Division of the Philippines, Jul. 1903), pp. 184–85.

2 The concept of identity used here is discussed in general terms by both Benedict Anderson and John R. Bowen. Anderson discusses the pre-national perceptions of co-fellow religionists of different language and ethnicity regarding themselves as belonging to the same community. This reflects the state of affairs for the Muslims for the late Spanish and early American periods in the southern Philippines when an imaged community depending on print media had not yet been used by the people of the area to mold their own political perceptions. That came only later and only after the Muslims had rejected membership in an imagined community put forward by the Filipinos living to the North, who did rely on print media for their own conceptualization of national life. Bowen, speaking largely of a later era in Southeast Asian existence, nonetheless also provides some pertinent comments about the nature of identity with locality, which certainly was a feature of the peoples living in the southern Philippines in the first half of the twentieth century. Strikingly, as American forces pacified the various ethnic groups, the basic identification of people with local rulers and local culture was enhanced and served as a point of identity for the local population in opposition to the plan to include them in a larger Philippine nation, largely identified with Catholic Filipinos. See Anderson, 's Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 1993), especially 12–19, 163–86Google Scholar; and Bowen, 's “The Form Culture Takes: A State of the Field Essay on the Anthropology of Southeast Asia”, Journal of Asian Studies 34, 4 (11 1995): 1047–1078, especially pp. 1061–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Gowing, , Mandate in Moroland, ch. 3Google Scholar; McKinley, “A Brief Summary”, pp. 151–55; Laarhoven, Ruurdje, Triumph of Mom Diplomacy: The Maguindanao Sultanate in the 17th Century (Quezon City: New Day Publishers, 1989), pp. 33–45Google Scholar.

4 McKinley, , “A Brief Summary”, p. 153Google Scholar.

5 Najeeb M. Saleeby, “The Moro Problem: An Academic Discussion of the History and Solution of the Problem of the Government of the Moros of the Philippine Islands” (An academic paper read before the Philippine Academy, Manila, Jan. 1913), pp. 97–102; Warren, James F., The Sulu Zone, 1768–1898 (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1981), pp. 147–97Google Scholar.

6 Forbes, W. Cameron, The Philippine Islands (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1928), pp. 15–26Google Scholar; Gowing, , Mandate in Moroland, ch. 4Google Scholar; Smythe, Donald, Guerrilla Warrior. The Early Life of John J. Pershing (New York: Charles Scribners Sons, 1973), pp. 66–204Google Scholar.

7 Hayden, Joseph Ralston, “What Next for the More?”, Foreign Affairs 6,4 (1928): 633–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 [Major General] George Whitelaw Davis, “Notes on the Government of the Country Inhabited by Non-Christians in Mindanao and the Neighboring Islands” (A report for the U.S. Army, Division of the Philippine Islands, Manila, 1902), pp. 19–20; Saleeby, “The Moro Problem”, p. 97; Landor, A. Henry Savage, The Gems of the East (New York and London: Harper & Bros, 1904), p. 197Google Scholar.

9 Smythe, , Guerrilla Warrior, pp. 70, 77Google Scholar.

10 Muslim perceptions of their religion encompassing all factors of life, with separation of religion and state largely impossible or impracticable, are a matter of considerable debate among Muslim and Western intellectuals at the current moment. For a view of the topic covering much of the modern Islamic world, see Smith, Charles D., “Secularism”, in The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, ed. Esposito, John L. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), IV, pp. 20–30Google Scholar. Indonesian scholars, particularly Nurcholish Madjied, have been interested in this subject because of the unique relationship of Muslims with a government that keeps some distance from Muslim identification. See Federspiel, Howard M., Muslim Intellectuals and National Development in Indonesia (Commack, New York: Nova Science Press, 1992), pp. 41–44, 185Google Scholar.

11 None of these writers, including the two leading scholars dealing with descriptions of Muslim society in the South, that is, Otley Beyer and Naguib Saleeby, showed any academic knowledge of the general principles of Islam or were conversant with the fundamentals of Islamic law, mysticism, philosophy and theology. References to Islamic teachings are always general and unspecific, such as teachings of the Qur'an or Mohammad's message, and the general learned writings of European scholars on Islam are never cited at all. This is not to say that some observers might not have done some serious reading on the subject, but only that almost none of those consulted for this study found it worthwhile to reflect on the available scholarly literature when making observations about Muslim attitudes and behavior in the southern Philippine Islands.

12 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of the Philippine Islands (Manila: Philippine Commission, 1905), III, pp. 564–65Google Scholar; Landor, , The Gems of the East, pp. 278–79Google Scholar.

13 Juramentado is the Spanish term, while the people in the south referred to the act as parang sabil, a Malay term meaning the holy war.

14 Landor, , The Gems of the East, p. 197Google Scholar; Follett, Helen, Men of the Sulu Sea (New York: Charles Scribner, 1945), pp. 38, 57Google Scholar.

15 Davis, , “Notes on the Government”, p. 125Google Scholar; Landor, , The Gems of the East, pp. 207–208, 264Google Scholar.

16 Follett, , Men of the Sulu Sea, pp. 181, 194Google Scholar; for Gottfried Simon, see The Progress and Arrest of Islam in Sumatra (London, Edinburgh and New York: Marshall Brothers, 1912)Google Scholar. See also Zwemer, Samuel M., Islam: A Challenge to Faith (New York: Student Volunteer Movement for Foreign Missions, 1906)Google Scholar.

17 Saleeby, , “The Moro Problem”, p. 158Google Scholar.

18 Warren, , The Sulu Zone, pp. 215–28Google Scholar.

19 Beyer, Otley H., The Non-Christian People of the Philippines (Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1921), p. 941Google Scholar. [Originally a part of the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of the Philippine Islands 1919 (Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1921), v. IIGoogle Scholar.]

20 Orosa, Sixto Y., The Sulu Archipelago and Its People (New York: World Book Company, 1923), pp. 86–90Google Scholar; Follett, , Men of the Sulu Sea, pp. 201–202Google Scholar.

21 Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, p. 87Google Scholar.

22 Worcester, Dean C., The Philippine Islands and Their People (New York: Macmillan Company, 1899), pp. 163–65Google Scholar; Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, pp. 91–92Google Scholar.

23 Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, p. 71Google Scholar.

24 Ibid., pp. 76–77; Worcester, , The Philippine Islands, pp. 195–96Google Scholar; Follett, , Men of the Sulu Sea, pp. 204–205Google Scholar.

25 Landor, , The Gems of the East, pp. 267–68Google Scholar; Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, pp. 77–79Google Scholar.

26 Worcester, , The Philippine Islands, pp. 163–64, 198–200Google Scholar: Skeat, Walter William, Malay Magic: An Introduction to the Folklore and Popular Religion of the Malay Peninsula (London: Frank Cass, 1965)Google Scholar.

27 Landor, , The Gems of the East, p. 171Google Scholar; Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, pp. 70–72Google Scholar.

28 Follett, , Men of the Sulu Sea, pp. 197–98Google Scholar; Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, p. 89Google Scholar.

29 Landor, , The Gems of the East, p. 268Google Scholar; Haynes, T. W., The Philippine Islands and the Sulu Sultanate (London: Baines & Scarsbrook, 1927), p. 10Google Scholar.

30 Beyer, , “The Non-Christian Tribes”, p. 950Google Scholar.

31 Landor, , The Gems of the East, pp. 188–89Google Scholar; Follett, , Men of the Sulu Sea, pp. 200–201Google Scholar.

32 Beyer, , “The Non-Christian Tribes”, pp. 945–48Google Scholar; Saleeby, , “The Moro Problem”, p. 169Google Scholar; Kuder, Edward M., “The Moros in the Philippines”, The Far Eastern Quarterly 4 (02 1945): 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 H.O. Beyer and F.D. Holleman, “Beyer-Holleman Collection of Original Sources in Philippine Customary Law” (Library of Congress and the Philippine Program, University of Chicago, n.d.).

34 Landor, , The Gems of the East, pp. 188–90Google Scholar; Saleeby, , The Moro Problem, pp. 161–67Google Scholar; Hayden, , “What Next for the Moro”, p. 636Google Scholar; Vollenhoven, Cornelius Van, Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian Adat Law (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1931)Google Scholar [Selections from Het adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indie (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1912)Google Scholar], 2 vols.

35 Landor, , The Gems of the East, pp. 208–209, 267Google Scholar.

36 Beyer, , The Non-Christian Tribes, p. 572Google Scholar; Gomez, Liborio, “Mohammedan Medical Practice in Cotabato Province”, The Philippine Journal of Science 16, 6 (11 1917): 266–69Google Scholar.

37 Census of the Philippine Islands, 1905, p. 571Google Scholar.

38 Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, pp. 70, 88Google Scholar.

39 Tarling, Nicholas (ed.), The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1992), vol. 1, pp. 414, 521, 523, 534, 560, 602Google Scholar.

40 See Gowing, , Mandate in Moroland, pp. 11, 13, 159, 280–81Google Scholar.

41 Rita Tuban has gathered some of the oral tradition of the Tausug people concerned with the use of the parang sabil by individuals and groups. See her “Tausug Folk Literature” (M.A. thesis, University of the Philippines, 1977)Google Scholar cited in Rixhon, Gerard, “The Parang Sabil Epic of the Tausuq Revisited: Exploring Varous Levels of Discourse”, paper presented at the Third Conference of Philippine Studies at Aix-en-Provence and scheduled for publication in the proceedings of that conference to be issued in 1998by Ateneo de Manila University PressGoogle Scholar.

42 Landor, , The Gems of the East, pp. 169–71Google Scholar; Orosa, , The Sulu Archipelago, pp. 79–80Google Scholar. Rixhon's “The Parang Sabil Epic” has a thoughtful commentary about the historical use of the parang sahil, about the liberty the entertainers used in presenting it in their oral epics, and about its confusion with running amok, which is a cultural characteristic throughout much of Southeast Asia.

43 Tarling, (ed.), The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, I, pp. 330–33, 339Google Scholar; Drewes, G.W.J., “The Coming of Islam to Indonesia”, in Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia, comp. Ahmad Ibrahim, Sharon Siddique and Yasmin Hussain (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1985), pp. 7–24Google Scholar; Johns, A.H., “Sufism as a Category in Indonesian Literature and History”, Journal of Southeast Asian History 2,2 (03 1961): 10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Winstedt, R.O., The Malay Magician: Being Shaman, Saiva and Sufi (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961), esp. pp. 72–80Google Scholar.

44 Mohamed, Haji bin Salim, , ed., Tokoh-Tokoh Agama di Brunei Darussalam: Pengenalan Ringkas (Brunei Darussalam: Muzium Brunei, 1992), especially Part IGoogle Scholar; Zain, Haji Md. bin Serudin, Haji, Brunei Darussalam: Persepsi Sejarah dan Masyarakatnya (Brunei Darussalam: Azza, 1992), pp. 44–46Google Scholar.

45 See, in particular Roff, William, Origins of Malay Nationalism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967)Google Scholar and Noer, Deliar, The Rise and Development of the Modernist Muslim Movement in Indonesia during the Dutch Colonial Period (1900–1942) (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1973)Google Scholar; Zain, Haji Md. bin Serudin, Haji, Brunei DarussalamGoogle Scholar.

46 Winstedt, Richard O., History of Classical Malay Literature (Singapore: JMBRAS and Star Press, 1961), pp. 112–26Google Scholar; Osman, Mohd. Taib, “Islamization of the Malays: A Transformation of Culture”, in Ibrahim, Ahmad, Siddique, Sharon and Hussain, Yasmin (comp.), Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia, pp. 44—47Google Scholar; Kim, Khoo Kay, Malay Society: Transformation and Democratisation (Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications, 1991), pp. 17–41Google Scholar.

47 See, especially, Kiefer, Thomas M., The Tausug: Violence and Law in a Philippine Moslem Society (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1990)Google Scholar; Moore, Ruth T., “Women and Warriors Defending Islam in the Southern Philippines” (Ph.D. diss., University of California at San Diego, 1981)Google Scholar and Wulff, Inger, “Features of Yakan Culture”, Folk 6,2 (1964): 53–72Google Scholar. For more on changed perceptions of later scholars, particularly anthropologists, see Bowen, , “The Forms Culture Takes”, pp. 1059–61Google Scholar.

48 Ball, John, Indonesian Legal History 1602–1848 (Sydney: Oughtershaw Press, 1982), pp. 38, 45–47Google Scholar.