Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:25:48.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development, Regional Disparity and Planning: The Experience of Northeast Thailand*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

C. J. Dixon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is considerable concern amongst development planners at the large and apparently growing areal disparities in the level of development in many underdeveloped countries. A number of theoretical studies support the view that economic growth inevitably results in widening disparities in the initial stages of economic development which may or may not be reversed with later growth. Empirical studies, although frequently lacking in comparability and deficient in data, confirm the existence of widening disparities in a large number of countries. Some planners have questioned the policy of maximising growth of gross product as the panacea for under-development and attempted to ensure more even patterns of development. Where economic and political unrest, including “insurgent activity”, have occurred, and have been equated by government officials with regional concentrations of poverty, further weight is given to policies directed towards reduction of regional disparities. However, where the results of schemes aimed at reducing regional imbalance have been assessed the success rate is slight. This paper examines the experience of Northeast Thailand, the Korat plateau, as an example of a backward region that has had considerable planning effort directed at it over the last twenty years.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1977 , pp. 210 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Field work was conducted in Thailand during the dry seasons 1971 to 1975, while the author was attached to the Lam Pao Project of the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London, supported by the Overseas Development Administration and the Social Science Research Council of the British Government.

References

1 Oshima, H.T., “Income Equality and Economic Growth”, Malayan Economic Review, 15 (1971), 7–36.Google Scholar

2 For example, Kuznets, S., “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, American Economic Review, 45, 1 (1955), 1–28Google Scholar; Myrdal, G.M., Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (London, 1957)Google Scholar; Hirschman, A. D., The Strategy of Economic Development (Yale University Press, 1958Google Scholar).

3 For example, Williamson, J. G., “Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13 (1965), 3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, C., Templeman, G. J. and Veroren, O., “Modernisation and Inequality”,paper presented to the Developing Areas Study Group of the Institute of British Geographers' symposium, Spatial Variations in Poverty (Birmingham, January 1973).Google Scholar

4 Shourie, A., “Growth Poverty and Inequalities”, Foreign Affairs, 51, 2 (1972), 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Dixon, C. J., “Rural Income Disparities and Instability in North-East Thailand”,paper presented to the Developing Areas Study Group of the Institute of British Geographers' symposium, Income Disparities During Development (Oxford, January 1975)Google Scholar.

6 Henshal, J. D., “Spatial Patterns of Poverty in Brazil”,paper presented to the Developing Area Study Group of the Institute of British Geographers' symposium, Spatial Variations In Poverty (Birmingham, January 1973)Google Scholar.

7 All regional and national gross product figures are derived from figures supplied by the National Economic and Social Development Board of Thailand.

8 L. Berger Incorporated, North East Thailand: Recommended Development Budget and Foreign Assistance Projects 1972–1976 (National Economic Development Board, Bangkok, 1972), Ch. 3, p. 1.

9 Ng, R., “A Study of Recent Migration in Thailand”, Journal of Tropical Geography, 31 (1970), 65–78Google Scholar.

10 Nakahara, J. and Witton, R.A., Development and Conflict in Thailand (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1971), p. 52Google Scholar; Nuechterlein, D. E., Thailand and the Struggle for South East Asia (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965), p. 221.Google Scholar

11 The Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, the Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank), the United States Operations Mission, and the Asian Development Bank.

12 Smyth, H. W., Five Years in Siam, 2 vols. (John Murray, London, 1898Google Scholar), see especially I, 232–233.

13 Keyes, C. F., Isan: Regionalism in North East Thailand (University of Cornell, 1965)Google Scholar.

14 Ibid.

15 van der Heide, J. H., “The Economical Development of Siam During the Last Century”, Journal of the Royal Siam Society, 3 (1906), 74–101.Google Scholar

16 Graham, W. A., Siam, a Handbook of Practical, Commercial and Political Information, 2 vols. (Alexander Moring, London, 1912), I, 9Google Scholar.

17 Zimmerman, C., Siam: First Rural Survey (Times Press, Bangkok, 1931)Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., p. 129

19 Ibid., pp. 50–52.

20 Andrew, J. M., Siam: Second Rural Economic Survey 1934–1935, (Harvard, undated)Google Scholar; Zimmerman, C., “Some Phases of Land Utilization in Siam”, Geographical Review, 27, (1937), 378–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 For example, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Report of the Food and Agricultural Organisation Mission for Siam (Washington, 1948)Google Scholar; Blanchard, W., ed., Thailand (Human Relations Area File Incorporated, Connecticut, 1958)Google Scholar; Platenius, H., The North East of Thailand: its Problems and Potential (National Economic Development Board, Bangkok, 1963)Google Scholar; Keyes, op.cit., Ng, R., “Rice Cultivation and Rural Settlement Density in North East Thailand”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 19 (1968), 200–210Google Scholar; idem, “Some Land Use Problems of North East Thailand”, Modern Asian Studies, 4, 1 (1970), 23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Dixon, C.J., “Land Use and Marketing”, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (University of London, 1974)Google Scholar. The final report of the Lam Pao project is in preparation by Dr. R. C. Y. Ng at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London University.

23 Keyes, op. cit.

24 Van der Heide, op. cit.

25 Keyes, op. cit.

26 Dixon, op. cit., p. 32.

27 Ibid; Dixon, C. J., The Pattern of Rice Disposal, Lam Pao Report Series, No. 4 (School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1974)Google Scholar.

28 Zimmerman, 1931, op. cit., Pendleton, R., Thailand: Aspects of Landscape and Life (American Geographical Society Handbook, Duell, Stoan and Pearce, New York, 1963)Google Scholar.

29 Ingram, J. C., Economic Change in Thailand, 1850–1970 (Stanford University Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

30 Nakahara and Witton, op. cit., p. 52.

31 Keyes, op. cit.

32 Pakkasem, P., Thailand's North East Development Planning: a Case Study in Regional Planning (National Economic and Social Development Board, Bangkok, 1973), pp. 15–16Google Scholar.

33 Ibid.

34 Ingram, op. cit.

35 Ibid.

36 Peagam, N., “We Don't Stay Where We are not Wanted”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 92, 14 (April 2, 1976), 10–12, see especially map of the bases, p. 12Google Scholar.

37 The Director of the United States Operations Missions, quoted by Caldwell, J.A., American Economic Aid to Thailand (Lexington Books, 1974), p. 135Google Scholar.

38 Nakahara and Witton, op. cit.

39 Air Chief Marshal Dawee Chulasapp, quoted in the Bangkok World, 17 November 1966.

40 Caldwell, op. cit.

41 Between 1961 and 1973 the annual growth rates of the North East had a coefficient of variability of 87·68% compared with 29·79% for the kingdom as a whole. (The coefficient of variability is a measure of the size of the standard deviation relative to the mean, expressed as a percentage; Blalock, H., Social Statistics (McGraw-Hill, London, 1960), pp. 73–74Google Scholar.

42 Calculated from figures contained in: Mekong Committee, Annual Statistical Bulletin, (Bangkok, 1972)Google Scholar.

43 Ingram, op. cit., pp. 220–236.

44 Cowan, J. A. and Chalmers, R. S., Economic Growth and Structural Change in North East Thailand (Bangkok, undated), p. 72Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., p. 73.

46 After 1969, the regional income statistics do not provide this breakdown.

47 National Statistical Office, Census of Industry (Bangkok, 1964)Google Scholar.

48 Cowan and Chalmers, op. cit., p. 9.

49 Ibid., p. 9.

50 Berger, op. cit., ch. 3, pp. 2–3.

51 Long, J. F. et al. , Economic and Social Conditions Among Farmers in Changwat Khon Kaen (Kasetsart University Economic Reports, No. 22, 1963), p. 14Google Scholar.

52 Cowan and Chalmers, op. cit., p. 11, and Berger, op. cit., ch. 1, p. 8.

53 Cowan and Chalmers, op. cit., p. 11.

54 Berger, op. cit., ch. 1, p. 8.

55 Graham, op. cit., 1, 9.

56 Platenius, op. cit., p. 1.

57 United Nations, Atlas of Physical, Economic and Soil Resources of the Lower Mekong Basin (Bangkok, 1968)Google Scholar.

58 Platenius, op. cit., p. 14.

59 Ibid.

60 The presence of exploitable mineral wealth on the Korat plateau would doubtless have fundamentally altered the political and economic structure of the region, as well as having profound repercussions for the country as a whole.

61 Wallace, W., An Analysis of North East Thailand's Transport Network as a Constraint to Economic Development (National Economic Development Board, Bangkok, 1970), p. 3Google Scholar.

62 Morrow, M., “Changing the Course of the Mekong”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 38, 89, (1975), 59–61Google Scholar.

63 Associated Scientific Research Corporation of Thailand, “Seasonality and Intensity of Rainfall in North East Thailand” (Bangkok, 1967), p. 3Google Scholar.

64 Ng, 1970, “Some Land Use Problems.…”, op. cit., p. 25.

65 See above, footnote 41.

66 Assen, J., Field Observations on Agriculture in North East Thailand, mimeograph (Bangkok, 1968), p. 15Google Scholar: Dixon, 1974, “Land Use and Marketing”, op. cit., p. 32.

67 Pendleton, op. cit., p. 113.

68 Pendleton, R. and Montrakun, S., The Soils of Thailand (Ministry of Agriculture, Bangkok, undated), pp. 71–72Google Scholar.

69 Ministry of Agriculture figures, given by Ng, op. cit., 1970, p. 24.

70 Poomvises, V. et al. , Detailed Reconnaissance Soil Survey of the Lam Pao Irrigation Project (Ministry of National Development, Bangkok, 1963), p. 9Google Scholar.

71 Pendleton, R., “The Importance of Termite Mounds in Modifying Certain Thai Soils”, Journal of American Agronomy, 34 (1942), 340–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 Dixon, C. J., “Land Parcellisation”, Area, 2, 7 (1975), 110–113Google Scholar.

73 Dixon, C. J., “Settlement and Environment in North East Thailand”, Journal of Tropical Geography, 46 (June, 1978)Google Scholar.

74 Holding size increased from an average figure of 0–8 hectares in 1929 to 1·1 hectares in 1936 and 3·97 in 1963. (Zimmerman, op. cit., 1931, p. 28; idem, op. cit., 937; National Statistical Office, Census of Agriculture, North East volume (1963).

75 Figures supplied by the Ministry of Agriculture and the National Statistical Office.

76 Glutinous rice is hardy and has a short growing season, which might account for its original adoption, see Watabe, T., Glutinous Rice in Northern Thailand (Centre for South East Asian Studies, Kyoto University, Japan, 1967)Google Scholar; Young, J. E. De, Village Life in Modern Thailand (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1955), especially p. 78Google Scholar.

77 Calculated from: Ministry of Agriculture, Annual Rice Reports, (1947–1974).

78 Dixon, C. J., “Markets, Marketing and Agricultural Change in North East Thailand”,paper presented to the Developing Areas Study Group of the Institute of British Geographers' conference(London,September 1974)Google Scholar.

79 Sithiporn, Prince, Rice Farming in Siam (Siam Society, Bangkok, 1969)Google Scholar.

80 Pendleton, op. cit., 1963; Zimmerman, op. cit., 1931.

81 Ingram, op. cit.

82 United States Bureau of Reclamation, Pa Mong Stage One Feasibility Report, appendix 6, p. I. 10 (Bangkok, 1968).

83 An investigation into the problems of tank irrigation has recently been completed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Royal Irrigation Department.

84 Mekong Committee, Tributary Projects in Thailand (Bangkok, 1970), 1Google Scholar.

85 United States Bureau of Reclamation, op. cit.

86 National Statistical Office, Annual Crop Cutting Surveys (Bangkok, 1968–1974)Google Scholar.

87 Bangkok Bank, Annual Report (Bangkok, 1967)Google Scholar.

88 Ng, R., Demaine, H. and Dixon, C. J., An Investigation of Second Cropping in the Lam Pra Plerng Irrigation Scheme, a report prepared for the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (1973)Google Scholar.

89 National Economic Development Board, Agricultural Development Strategy for Thailand Bangkok, 1969), 11Google Scholar.

90 Graham, op. cit.

91 Platenius, op. cit., 108; Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Year Book of Food and Agricultural Statistics, annual (Rome and Washington, 1969)Google Scholar.

92 The New Zealand Project at Borabue showed that high grade livestock could be successfully reared on a large scale.

93 Food and Agriculture Organisation, op. cit. (1969).

94 Pakkasem, op. cit.

95 Motooka, T., Agricultural Development in Thailand (Centre for South East Asian Studies, Kyoto University, 1971), pp. 181–212Google Scholar; Demaine, H., “The Role of Farmers' Associations in Agricultural Development: a Case Study from North East Thailand”, in Plunkett Foundation, Yearbook of Agricultural Co-operation 1974 (Blackwells, Oxford, 1974)Google Scholar.

96 Dixon, ‘Markets, Marketing…’, op. cit., 1974.

97 Pakkasem, op. cit.

98 Ibid.

99 Smyth, op. cit.

100 Keyes, op. cit.

101 Cripps, F., The Far Province (Hutchinson, London, 1965), pp. 1–4Google Scholar.

102 G. Young, “Communist Rebels Terrorise Villages in Thailand's Siberia”, Observer (November 20, 1966), p. 4.

103 Nakahara and Witton, op. cit., p. 43.

104 Dixon, op. cit., 1975.

105 Pakkasem, op. cit.

106 Ibid.

107 Peagam, op. cit.