Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:16:17.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucratic Corruption in the ASEAN Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Their Anti-Corruption Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

Jon S. T. Quah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Bureaucratic corruption is one of the most serious and embarrassing obstacles to national development in the developing countries, which include among others the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) viz., Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. According to an official of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific:

Donor countries and the United Nations bodies working in developing countries are well aware that one of the most serious problems hampering development is corruption; so are the recipient countries. But no one seems prepared to discuss it publicly.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 153 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted in Bickler, Colin, “Corruption — A Serious and Embarrassing Problem Often Brushed Aside”, The Mirror (Singapore), 2 Apr. 1979, p. 6.Google Scholar

2 Heidenheimer, Arnold J. (ed.), Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis (New York, 1970), pp.4–6.Google Scholar

3 Quah, Jon S.T., “Administrative and Legal Measures for Combating Bureaucratic Corruption in Singapore” (Singapore, 1978), p. 5.Google Scholar

4 For a description of different types of corrupt practices, see Hager, L. Michael, “Bureaucratic Corruption in India: Legal Control of Maladministration”, Comparative Political Studies VI, 2 (July 1973): 200–201.Google Scholar

5 For reviews of the literature on bureaucratic corruption, see Caiden, Gerald E. and Caiden, Naomi J., “Administration Corruption”, Public Administration Review XXXVII, 3 (May/June 1977): 301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jabbra, Joseph G., “Bureaucratic Corruption in the Third World: Causes and Remedy”, Indian Journal of Public Administration XXII, 4 (Oct.-Dec. 1976): 673–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Wraith, Ronald and Simpkins, Edgar, Corruption in Developing Countries (New York, 1963)Google Scholar.

6 Myrdal, Gunnar, Asian Drama, II (Middlesex, 1968), pp. 938–39Google Scholar.

7 For examples of research done on India, see Dwivedy, S.N. and Bhargara, G.S., Political Corruption in India (New Delhi, 1967)Google Scholar; Monteiro, J.B., Corruption: Control of Maladministration (Bombay, 1966)Google Scholar; and Barnabas, A.P., Citizens' Grievances and Administration (New Delhi, 1969)Google Scholar. Research conducted on bureaucratic corruption in Africa include: Galied, Ali Khalif, “Bureaucratic Corruption in Developing Countries; A Comparative Analysis and Conceptual Inquiry” (D.P.A. dissertation, Syracuse University, 1972)Google Scholar; Le Vine, Victor T., Political Corruption: The Ghana Case (Stanford, 1975)Google Scholar; and Werlin, Herbert H., “The Consequences of Corruption: The Ghanaian Experience”, Political Science Quarterly LXXXVIII, 1 (March 1973): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Scott, James C., Comparative Political Corruption (Englewood Cliffs, 1972)Google Scholar.

9 Furnivall, J. S., Colonial Policy and Practice: A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India (Cambridge, 1948), p. 269.Google Scholar

10 Smith, Theodore M., “Corruption, Tradition and Change”, Indonesia XI (Apr. 1971): 23.Google Scholar

11 Day, Clive, The Dutch in Java (London, 1966), pp. 100–103Google Scholar, quoted in ibid., p. 23.

12 Hadisumarto, Djunaedi, “The Indonesian Civil Service and its Reform Movements” (D.P.A. dissertation, University of Southern California, 1974), p. 116.Google Scholar

13 For more details on the origins of the public bureaucracy in Indonesia, see Quah, Jon. S.T., “The Origins of the Public Bureaucracies in the ASEAN Countries”, Indian Journal of Public Administration XXIV, 2 (Apr.–June 1978): 406–10.Google Scholar

14 Smith, “Corruption, Tradition and Change”, pp. 24–25.

15 Glassburner, Bruce, “Indonesia's New Economic Policy and Its Socio-Political Implications” in Jackson, Karl D. and Pye, Lucian W. (eds.), Political Power and Communications in Indonesia (Berkeley, 1978), p. 163.Google Scholar

16 Mackie, J.A.C., “The Commission of Four Report on Corruption”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies VI. 3 (1970): 87–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Quoted in Straits Times (Singapore), 29 Aug. 1980, p. 6.

18 Pathmanathan, Murugesu, “Negative Bureaucratic Behaviour: Legal and Administrative Measures”(Paper presented at the Bureaucratic Behaviour in Asia Project,Pattaya,Jan. 1977), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

19 Federation of Malaya, Report of a Commission of Enquiry into the Integrity of the Public Services (Kuala Lumpur, 1955), p. 63.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., p. 3.

21 Ibid., p. 5.

22 Ibid., p. 59.

23 Ibid., p. 60.

24 Ibid., p. 60.

25 Ibid., pp. 50–54.

26 Ibid., p. 59.

27 Marican, Y. Mansoor, “Combating Corruption: The Malaysian Experience”, Asian Survey XIX, 6 (June 1979): 601.Google Scholar

28 Indorf, Hans. H., “Party System Adaptation to Political Development in Malaysia during the First Decade of Independence, 1957–1967” (Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, 1969), pp. 469–70.Google Scholar

29 Ibid., p. 472.

30 Siang, Lim Kit, “Corruption in High Political Places” in Time Bombs in Malaysia, 2nd ed. (Kuala Lumpur, 1978), p. 47.Google Scholar

31 Marican, “Combating Corruption”, p. 608.

32 Lim, “Corruption in High Political Places”, pp. 43–44.

33 Corpuz, Onofre D., The Bureaucracy in the Philippines (Manila, 1957), p. 129.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., pp. 111–12.

35 Ibid., p. 169.

36 Endriga, Jose N., “Historical Notes on Graft and Corruption in the Philippines”(Paper presented at the Bureaucratic Behaviour in Asia Project,Pattaya,Jan. 1977), pp. 22–23.Google Scholar

37 Corpuz, The Bureaucracy in the Philippines, p. 183.

38 Ibid., pp. 222–23.

39 Alfiler, Ma. Concepcion P., “Administrative Measures against Bureaucratic Corruption: The Philippine Experience”(Paper presented at the Bureaucratic Behaviour in Asia Project,Singapore,Nov. 1977), p. 4.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., pp. 13–16.

41 Ibid., pp. 16–18.

42 Quoted in Iglesias, Gabriel U., “The Passage of the Anti-Graft Law” in De Guzman, Raul P. (ed.), Patterns in Decision-Making: Case Studies in Philippine Public Administration (Manila, 1963), p. 20.Google Scholar

43 Alfiler, “Administrative Measures against Bureaucratic Corruption”, pp. 20–30.

44 Bloodworth, Dennis, “The Sweet Smell of Corruption” in An Eye for the Dragon: South-east Asia Observed, 1954–73 (Middlesex, 1974), p. 170.Google Scholar

45 Quoted in Carino, Ledivina V., “The Definition of Graft and Corruption and the Conflict of Ethics and Law”(Paper presented at the Bureaucratic Behaviour in Asia Project,Pattaya,Jan. 1977), p. 22Google Scholar.

46 Quah, “Administrative and Legal Measures”, p. 9.

47 Chee-Meow, Seah, “Bureaucratic Development and Corruption in Historical Perspective”(Revised version of paper presented at the Bureaucratic Behaviour in Asia Project,Singapore,Nov. 1977), p. 21.Google Scholar

48 Quah, Jon S.T., “Police Corruption in Singapore: An Analysis of Its Forms, Extent and Causes”, Singapore Police Journal X, 1 (Jan. 1979): 24.Google Scholar

49 Ibid., pp. 24–25.

50 Ibid., pp. 25–27.

51 Seah, op. cit., pp. 30–32.

52 Siew-Wah, Yoong, “Some Aspects of Corruption”, National Youth Leadership Training Institute Journal (Jan. 1973): 55–56.Google Scholar

53 Quah, “Administrative and Legal Measures”, p. 14.

54 Ibid., pp. 14–15.

55 Quah, , “Administrative Reform and Development Administration in Singapore: A Comparative Study of the Singapore Improvement Trust and the Housing and Development Board” (Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University, 1975), p. 281.Google Scholar

56 Ibid., pp. 281–90.

57 Nakata, Thinapan, “Corruption in the Thai Bureaucracy: Who Gets What, How and Why in Its Public Expenditures”, Thai Journal of Development Administration XVIII, I (Jan. 1978): 102.Google Scholar

58 Samudavanija, Chai Anan, “Problems of Bureaucratic Corruption in Thailand: A Study of Legal Codes, Administrative and Institutional Arrangements”(Paper presented at the Bureaucratic Behaviour in Asia Project,Pattaya,Jan. 1977), pp. 1 and 4.Google Scholar

59 Wales, H.G. Quaritch, Ancient Siamese Government and Administration (London, 1934), p. 224Google Scholar, quoted in Ibid., p. 4.

60 Samudavanija, “Problems of Bureaucratic Corruption in Thailand”, p. 7.

61 Suwanagul, Kasem, “The Civil Service of Thailand” (Ph.D. dissertation, New York University, 1962), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar

62 James C. Scott, Comparative Political Corruption, p. 67.

63 Nakata, Thinapan, Bureaucratic Corruption in Thailand: Incongruities between Legal Codes and Social Norms (Bangkok, 1977), pp. 37, 39, 55–56, 60, 64–65, and 72–73.Google Scholar

64 Neher, Clark D., “Political Corruption in a Thai Province”, The Journal of Developing Areas XI, 4 (July 1977): 484–89Google Scholar.

65 Caiden, Gerald E. and Caiden, Naomi J., “Coping with Administrative Corruption: An Academic Perspective”, Dynamics of Development: An International Perspective, Vol. 1, ed. Sharma, S.K. (New Delhi, 1978), pp. 489–94Google Scholar. See also: Braibanti, Ralph, “Reflections on Bureaucratic Corruption”, Public Administration (London), XL, 4 (Winter 1962): 357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

66 Quah, “Administration and Legal Measures”, p. 6.

67 Ibid., p. 17.

68 Alfiler, “Administrative Measures against Bureaucratic Corruption”, p. 6.

69 For a detailed account of how this law was passed, see Iglesias, “The Passage of the Anti-Graft Law”, pp. 17–68.

70 Alfiler, “Administrative Measures against Bureaucratic Corruption”, pp. 7–9.

71 Marican, “Combating Corruption”, p. 599.

72 Pathmanathan, “Negative Bureaucratic Behaviour”, p. 19.

73 See Ibid., pp. 27–29; and Marican, “Combating Corruption”, p. 601.

74 Marican, “Combating Corruption”, pp. 601 and 603.

75 Ibid., pp. 605–606.

76 Palmier, Leslie, “The Control of Bureaucratic Corruption in Southern Asia”(Paper presented at the Fourth National Development Research Conference,Glasgow,September 1978), p. 2.Google Scholar

77 Ibid., p. 2.

78 Palmier, Leslie, “Institutional Mechanisms for Controlling Bureaucratic Corruption in Asia”(Paper presented at the Development Studies Association Conference,Wales,1980), p. 10.Google Scholar

79 Smith, “Corruption, Tradition and Change”, p. 21.

80 Mackie, J.A.C., “The Commission of Four Report on Corruption”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies VI, 3 (1970): 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Manurung, Cyrus, “Public Personnel System in Indonesia”(Paper presented at the APDAC Workshop on New Policies, Developments and Trends in the Civil Service of Asian Countries,Singapore,September 1979), pp. 68–70.Google Scholar

82 Palmier, “Institutional Mechanisms…”, p. 12.

83 Palmier, “The Control of Bureaucratic Corruption”, p. 2.

84 Manurung, “Public Personnel System in Indonesia”, pp. 70–71.

85 Palmier, “Institutional Mechanisms…”, pp. 13–14.

86 Palmier, “The Control of Bureaucratic Corruption”, p. 3.

87 Samudavanija, “Problems of Bureaucratic Corruption in Thailand”, p. 30.

88 The five members of BIFGO were the Prime Minister (who was also the Chairman), the Deputy Prime Minister, a senior Minister, the Under-Secretary of State for the Prime Minister's Office, and the Committee's Secretary-General. Ibid., p. 31.

89 Ibid., pp. 36–37.

90 Ibid., pg. 37.

91 Ibid., pp. 39–40.

92 Ibid., pp. 47–49 and 55.

93 Ibid., pp. 58–60.

94 Settlements, Straits, Legislative Council Proceedings 1937 (Singapore, 1938), p. B139Google Scholar.

95 See for example, Tien, Albert, “How Singapore Stops Corruption”, Insight (January 1973), 16–19Google Scholar; Jordan, Peter, “The ‘Mr Clean’ of Asia”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 6 Sept. 1974, p. 23Google Scholar; and ”No Corruption in Singaporeand China”, New Nation(Singapore),2Nov. 1977, p. 4.

96 Hanna, Willard A., “A Primer of Korupsi”, AUFS Southeast Asia Series XIX, 8 (Aug. 1971): 1 and 7Google Scholar.