No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Archaeology and Anthropology in Southeast Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 April 2011
Extract
I agreed in the fall of 1979 to be the guest editor of a special issue of the Journal of Southeast Asian Studies on the state of the art of archaeology and anthropology in Southeast Asia. This special issue was to be published in March 1984 and I was to have the papers to the editor by the 15th of October 1983; plenty of time I thought. I first attempted to get two senior American anthropologists to be associate editors, one for Mainland Southeast Asia and one for Island Southeast Asia. This did not work out so in the fall of 1980 I started to organize authors for each country. By the summer of 1981 I had arranged authors for thirteen reports.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1987
References
I would like to dedicate this collection of papers to Donn Hart and David W. McCredie. Hart would have been the co-author of the paper on anthropology in the Philippines. He died while this paper was in the advanced planning stage, unfortunately before it was written. McCredie died not long after the completion of the paper for which he is a co-author. We miss both of them and are sorry they could not have been with us to have seen their papers in print.
1 “Bangladesh, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan, Thailand”, Social Sciences in Asia, No. 1, Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences No. 32 (Paris: Unesco, 1976), 54Google Scholar pp.; “Afghanistan, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Nepal”, Social Science in Asia, No. 2, Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences No. 33 (Paris: Unesco, 1976), 70 pp.Google Scholar; “Burma, Mongolia, New Zealand, The Philippines, Singapore”, Social Science in Asia, No. 3, Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences No. 35 (Paris: Unesco, 1977), 111 pp.Google Scholar; “Australia, Fiji, Hong Kong, India, Papua New Guinea, Sri Lanka”, Social Science in Asia, No. 4, Reports and Papers in the Social Sciences No. 42 (Paris: Unesco, 1980), 96 ppGoogle Scholar. The above four numbers were updated and contributions from China, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam are included for the first time in Social Sciences in Asia and the Pacific (Paris: Unesco, 1984), 621 ppGoogle Scholar.
2 Atal, Yogesh (ed.), Sociology and Social Anthropology in Asia and the Pacific (New Delhi: Wiley Eastern; Paris: Unesco, 1985), 529 ppGoogle Scholar.
3 Michael Aung Thwin, “Burma Before Pagan: The Status of Archaeology Today” (in press, 1982–83).
4 Solheim, Wilhelm G. II, “H. Otley Beyer”, Asian Perspectives 12 (1969): 1–18Google Scholar.
5 Zamora, Mario D. (ed.), Studies in Philippine Anthropology (Quezon City: Alemar-Phoenix, 1967)Google Scholar.
6 Saito, Shiro, Philippine Ethnography: A Critically Annotated and Selected Bibliography (Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 1972), 512 ppGoogle Scholar.
7 Zamora, Mario D., “Cultural Anthropology in the Philippines — 1900–1983: Perspectives, Problems, and Prospects”, in Changing Identities in Modern Southeast Asia, ed. Banks, David J. (The Hague: Mouton Publishers), pp. 311–39Google Scholar.
8 Casiño, Eric S., “The Future of Anthropology in the Philippines”, Solidarity 2, No. 9 (1967): 16–23Google Scholar; “History of Philippine Anthropology” (unpublished manuscript).
9 Tantoco, Rosario B. (ed.), Proceedings of the First Regional Seminar on Southeast Asian Prehistory and Archaeology (Manila: National Museum, 1974)Google Scholar.
10 Solheim, Wilhelm G. II, “The Far Eastern Prehistory Association”, Asian Perspective 1 (1957): 6–12Google Scholar.