Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:53:33.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Resource Management and Archaeology at Chiang Saen, Northern Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

Sawang Lertrit
Sawang Lertrit
Affiliation:
Silpakorn University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Chiang Saen in northern Thailand as a case study, this paper describes the practice of archaeology as conducted by the Thai Fine Arts Department. In particular, it examines how the Chiang Saen archaeological site has been treated under the rubric of “cultural resource management”.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 137 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Lipe, W.D., “A Conservation Model for American Archaeology”, The Kiva 39, 3–4 (1974): 213–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Green, W. and Doershuk, J.F., “Cultural Resource Management and American Archaeology”, Journal of Archaeological Research 6,2 (1996): 121–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Archaeological Resource Management in the U.K., Hunter, J. and Ralston, I., ed. (Dover, UK: Alan Sutton, 1993)Google Scholar; and Archaeological Resource Management in Australia and Oceania, McKinlay, J.R. and Jones, L.L., ed. (Wellington: New Zealand Historic Places Trust, 1979)Google Scholar. I would like to express my sincere thanks to the following individuals for editing and commenting on the earlier version of this paper: Professor William D. Lipe, Professor Karl L. Hutterer, Professor William Andrefsky, Jr., Professor Barry S. Hewlett, and Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald. My special thanks go to Professor Michael Graves for his additional valuable comments and suggestions, I am also grateful to an anonymous reviewer and to Dr. Bruce Lockhart for suggestions. Finally, many individuals helped me in collecting data during my field seasons in Chiang Saen. They include Pariwat Thammapreechakorn, Tassana Doy-asa, Jantana Puyathon, and Somlak Yacharoen. My heartfelt thanks go to all of them.

2 Charoenwongsa, Pisit, “Managing Thailand's Archaeological Resources”,paper presented at the Fifteenth Congress of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association,Chiang Mai, 1994Google Scholar; “Nai Luang kap kanchatkan sapphayakon thang watthanatham”,paper delivered at the 919 Central Security Keeping Division Radio Station,Bangkok, 1995.Google Scholar

3 See Fine Arts Department, Phiphithaphanthasathan haeng chat nai Prathet Thai, cremation volume for Chira Chongkol (Bangkok: Fine Arts Dept., 1989)Google Scholar; Fine Arts Department, Thritsadi lae kanpatibat nai kananurak lae sanguanraksa boranwatthu lae laeng borannakhadi, Technical Series No. 1/1989 (Bangkok: Fine Arts Dept., 1990)Google Scholar; Sangruchi, Koranee, “Kanchatkan sapphayakon thang watthanatham”, unpublished manuscript written in 1992Google Scholar; Pisit, “Managing Thailand's Archaeological Resources”; Ketudhat, Pthomrerk, “Phattanakan khong borannakhadi Thai”, Muang Boran 21,1–4 (1995): 15–44Google Scholar; Lertrit, Sawang, “Archaeological Resources Protection and Management in Thailand: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives”, SPAFA Journal 6,3 (1996): 35–46.Google Scholar

4 Charoenwongsa, Pisit, “The State of Prehistoric Research in Thailand”, in Final Report: SPAFA Seminar on Prehistory of Southeast Asia (Bangkok: SEAMEO Project in Archaeology and Fine Arts), pp. 55–57Google Scholar.

5 Fine Arts Department, Thritsadi lae kanpatibat, p. 24.

6 Fine Arts Department, The Ten Historical Parks of Thailand (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1995)Google Scholar; Chanya Manawit, personal communication (1997).

7 See Fine Arts Department, Ten Historical Parks.

8 Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Phaen maebot samrap kananurak lae burana meuang prawattisat Chiang Saen (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1995)Google Scholar.

9 Chaiseno, Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence at the Ancient Town in Ampoe Chiang Saen, Changwat Chiang Rai” (M.A. thesis, Department of Archaeology, Silpakorn University, 1987)Google Scholar; Penth, Hans, A Brief History of Lanna (Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 1994)Google Scholar; Unchaichin, Kraisin, “Meuang boran Chiang Saen”, Muang Boran Journal 20,2 (1994): 9–22Google Scholar; Leksukhum, Santi, Sinlapa Phak Neua: Hariphunchai-Lanna (Bangkok: Muang Boran, 1995)Google Scholar; Dejwongya, Jirasak, Phra Chedi Meuang Chiang Saen (Chiang Mai: Suriwong Book Center, 1996)Google Scholar.

10 See Kraisin, “Meuang boran Chiang Saen”.

11 Maleipan, Veerapan, “Old Stone Age Tools at Chiang Saen”, Archaeology (Journal of the Faculty of Archaeology, Silpakorn University) 4,1 (1972): 35–41Google Scholar.

12 Karl Hutterer, personal communication (1997).

13 Veerapan, “Old Stone Age Tools”.

14 See Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”; Penth, A Brief History; Kraisin, “Meuang boran Chiang Saen”; Wyatt, D. K., Thailand: A Short History (Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 1984)Google Scholar and “Southeast Asia ‘Inside Out’, 1300–1800”, Modern Asian Studies 31 (1997): 689–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Wyatt, Thailand, pp. 30–32.

16 See Promwichit, Paitoon, Tamnan Meuang Chiang Saen (Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University Institute of Social Research, 1995Google Scholar).

17 Penth, A Brief History, and Wyatt, Thailand, p. 30.

18 Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”, p. 16; Ongsakul, Sarassawadee, Prawattisat Lanna, 2nd edition (Bangkok: Amarin Printing, 1996), p. 133.Google Scholar

19 Byrne, D., “Buddhist Stupa and Thai Social Practice”, World Archaeology 27,2 (1995): 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Penth, A Brief History, p. 17.

20 Ibid., p. 18.

21 See Santi, Sinlapa Phak Neua, and Jirasak, Phra Chedi.

22 See ibid., and Praphatthong, Kongdej, “Phra Sathup Chedi nai Meuang Chiang Saen”, in Borannakhadi Prawattisat (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1986)Google Scholar.

23 Jirasak, Phra Chedi, p. 33.

24 See ibid, for more detail.

25 Sarassawadee, Prawattisat Lanna, p. 172.

26 See Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”.

27 Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Raingan kankhutkhon klum boransathan nai Wat Pa Sak, Vol.1, No. 1 (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1988), pp. 23–30Google Scholar.

28 Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”, p. 128.

29 Sarassawadee, Prawattisat Lanna, pp. 178–81.

30 Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”, p. 127.

31 See Northern Thailand Archaeological Research Project, Raingan kansamruat Meuang Chiang Saen, Chiang Rai, Vol. 1, No. 3 (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1982)Google Scholar; Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”; Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Raingan kankhutkhon thang borannakhadi thi Wat Pa Sak, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1989Google Scholar) and Vol. 3, No. 1 (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1990).

32 Penth, A Short History, p. 28.

33 Ibid., pp. 29–30.

34 Rajanubhab, Prince Damrong, Thai rop Phama (Bangkok: Phrae Pittaya, 1971), pp. 645–47.Google Scholar

35 Chiang Saen District Office, “Banyai sarup Meuang Chiang Saen” (unpublished manuscript, 1996).

36 Chiang Saen Educational Office, “Phaen phattana thesaban Meuang Chiang Saen (1997–2001)” (unpublished manuscript, 1995).

37 See Chiang Saen District Office, “Banyai sarup Meuang Chiang Saen”.

38 Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, “Rang khrongkan anurak lae burana meuang boran Chiang Saen” (unpublished manuscript, 1994), p. 24.

39 Wongthangsawasdi, Nuansiri, Phumisat kayaphap Phak Neua, 3rd edition (Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University, Faculty of Social Science, 1991), p. 66Google Scholar; Kraisin, “Meuang boran Chiang Saen”, p. 9.

40 Nuansiri, Phumisat, p. 68.

41 See Jiajanpong, Piset, “Boransathan nai Lanna”, in Kankhuen thabian boransathan nai Phak Neua khong Prathet Thai (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1982), pp. 1–38Google Scholar; Northern Thailand Archaeological Research Project, Raingan kansamruat; Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Raingan kankhutkhon, Vol. 2, No. 2 and Vol. 3, No. 1; Santi, Sinlapa Phak Neua; Jirasak, Phra Chedi.

42 Supajanya, Thiva, “Moated Sites in Lanna”, Sinlapakon University Journal 11,1 (1990): 24–35Google Scholar.

43 Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”, p. 8

44 Amartayakul, Tree, Nam thiew Meuang Chiang Rai, cremation volume for Khunying Ratdejdamrong (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1967), p. 39Google Scholar; see also Fine Arts Department, “Kanburana lae fuenfu Meuang Chiang Saen”, Silpakorn 1,1 (1957): 85Google Scholar.

45 Kraisin, “Meuang boran Chiang Saen”, p. 9.

46 Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”.

47 Songsiri, Wilailak, “Kanburana pom Meuang Chiang Saen”, Muang Boran Journal 18,2 (1992): 73Google Scholar.

48 Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”, p. 9.

49 Northern Thailand Archaeological Research Project, Raingan kansamruat, p. 7; Kraisin, “Meuang boran Chiang Saen”, p. 9.

50 See Northern Thailand Archaeological Research Project, Raingan kansamruat; and Fine Arts Department, “Kanburana”. For a detailed description of each fort, see Lertrit, Sawang, “The Management of Archaeological Resources in Thailand: A Case Study of the Historic Town of Chiang Saen” (M.A. thesis, Washington State University at Pullman, 1997)Google Scholar.

51 See Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Phaen maebot.

52 See Northern Thailand Archaeological Research Project, Raingan kansamruat; Fine Arts Department, Raingan kansamruat; Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Raingan kankhutkhon, Vol. 2, No.2 and Vol. 3; No. 1; Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, “Rang khrongkan”; Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”; and Jirasak, “Meuang boran Chieng Saen”.

53 See Yubho, Dhanit, “Kanburana boransathan nai Meuang Chiang Saen” (unpublished manuscript, dated 1958, on file in National Archives of Thailand, Bangkok)Google Scholar.

54 See Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Phaen maebot, p. 2.

55 Ruangkhana, Somchit, “Raingan kankhutkhon lae burana mondop Wat Mahathat, Tambon Wiang, Amphoe Chiang Saen, Changwat Chiang Rai”, Sinlapakon 12,3 (1968): 88–93Google Scholar; and “Raingan Kankhutkhon lae burana Chedi Wat Phra Yuen, Tambon Wiang, Amphoe Chiang Saen, Changwat Chiang Rai”, Sinlapakon 13,6 (1969): 88–92.Google Scholar

56 Veerapan, “Old Stone Age Tools”, pp. 35–41.

57 Kongdej Praphattong, “Rongroi borannakhadi nai si amphoe khong Changwat Chiang Rai” (unpublished, undated manuscript).

58 Vallibhotama, Srisakara, “Khomun lae khokhit mai kiewkap Chiang Saen lae Phayao”, Muang Boran Journal 7,2 (1981): 9–28Google Scholar.

59 “No na Paknam”, “Sinlapa Chiang Saen lae Phayao”, Muang Boran Journal 7,2 (1981): 49–60Google Scholar.

60 Northern Thailand Archaeological Research Project, Raingan kansamruat.

61 Fourth Regional Arts Unit, Raingan kankhutkhon, Vol. 1, No. 1; and Raingan kankhutkhon, Vol. 2, No. 2.

62 Fourth Regional Arts Unit, Raingan kankhutkhon, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 23, 39.

63 See Boosaya, “A Study on Archaeological Evidence”.

64 In addition to the Fourth Regional Arts Unit reports already cited, see also Tankitikorn, Vichai, Guide to Wat Pa Sak (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1991)Google Scholar.

65 Fourth Regional Arts Unit, Phaen maebot.

66 Ibid.

67 Fine Arts Department, Kankhuen thabian.

68 Sakulpanich, Ratchanee, Khumue patibat samrap khratachakan tarn Phraratchabanyat Boransathan, Boranwatthu, Sinlapawatthu lae Phiphitthaphanthasathan haeng Chat Pho. So. 2504 lae Kaekhai Pho. So. 2525 (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1995)Google Scholar.

69 Fine Arts Department, Raingan kansamruat boransathan nai Meuang Chiang Saen, Division of Archaeology Document No. 4/B.E. 2530 (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1987)Google Scholar.

70 Ruangkhana, Somchit, “Nam thuam nai Chiang Saen” (unpublished report submitted to the Fine Arts Department, 1956)Google Scholar.

71 See Nai Prathet Thai (Bangkok: Fine Arts Department, 1987)Google Scholar.

72 Fine Arts Department, The Ten Historical Parks, p. 3.

73 Fourth Regional Fine Arts Unit, Phaen maebot.

74 Fine Arts Department, Phiphithaphanthasathan, pp. 187, 180.

75 Thammapreechakorn, Pariwat and Doy-Asa, Tassana, Meuang Chiang Saen (Bangkok: Office of Archaeology and National Museums, Fine Arts Department, 1996), pp. 43–120Google Scholar.

76 US$1 is around 35 baht.

77 Rasmibhuti, Suvit, “Kananurak boransathan lae boranwatthu: panha lae naewthang kaekhai”, in Third Forum on Conservation of Natural Resources and Environments in Thailand, ed. Nutalia, P. (Bangkok: Forum for Annual Reporting on Environment, 1989), p. 218Google Scholar.

78 Lertrit, Sawang, “Who Owns the Past? A Perspective from Chiang Saen, Thailand”, Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 2,2 (1997): 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Ibid.