Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:13:40.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems in the Study and Teaching of National History in Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Get access

Extract

As far back as 1913, Hoesein Djajadiningrat made a critical study of one of the sources for Indonesian history. He was the first Indonesian to do so. But his work, though important, cannot be properly considered as the beginning of modern Indonesian historiography. This came later.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Critische Beshouwing van de Sadjarah Banten, (Leiden, 1913)Google Scholar

2. MrPringgodigdo, A. K., Sedjarah Pergerakan Rakjat Indonesia, 1st. ed. (Djakarta, 1949).Google Scholar

idem, Geschiedenis der ondernemingen van het Mangkoenagorosche Rijk., (Den Haag? 1950).Google Scholar

3. Yamin, Muhammad, 6000 Tahun Sang Merah Putih, (Djakarta, 1954)Google Scholar. idem, Naskah Persiapan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, (Djakarta, 1960).Google Scholar

4. Sartono Kartodirdjo, strictly speaking our first historian with an academic historical training, graduated in 1956 from the Faculty of Arts, University of Indonesia, Djakarta.

5. The two faculties in Bandung seceded and became the nucleus of the new Bandung Institute of Technoloky.

6. Republican in the sense of belonging to the Republic of Indonesia; the opposite is Dutch or “federal”, denoting everything belonging to the Dutch regime or the puppet governments sponsored by the Dutch.

7. Auxiliary disciplines help another discipline, c.q. history. Needless to say that history in its turn could also be considered an auxiliary discipline of philology, sociology, etc. Ancillary disciplines on the other hand have no separate existence outside their “service” to the historical discipline; although some of them, like archaeology have developed into a discipline in their own right.

8. Pollard, A.F., Fartors in Modern History, (London, 1960, repr. 3rd ed.), 14Google Scholar

9. See Mansur, M.D., “Pendulikan Ahli Sedjarah”Google Scholar, Proceedings of the First History Seminar, stencil, 4.

10. E.g. by Soebantardjo, Ki Padmapuspita, and others

11. J.H.J. van cler Pot, De Periodisering der Greshiedenis: Een Overziche der Theorien, ('s Gravenhage, 1951).Google Scholar

12. This and the following periodizations were presented at the First History Seminar in Jogjakarta, at 1957. For Yamin's periodization, see also: ProfYamin, H. Muhammad, 6000 Tahun Sang Merah Putih, (Djakarta), 1958.Google Scholar