Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:08:08.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selectivity and Targeting in Income Support: The Australian Experience*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Peter Saunders
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Australian income support system is often characterised as one of the most selective in the Western industrialised world. This paper examines the sense in which the Australian system is selective, and discusses the distinction between selectivity and targeting in income support provisions. Developments in social security outlays and recipient numbers over the last two decades are compared with those occurring since 1983, in order that the nature and impact of recent policies introduced to increase targeting can be identified. The analysis indicates that increases in recipient numbers have been the dominant factor underlying the past growth in social security expenditure. The distinction between selectivity and targeting of income support provisions is then explained with reference to the concepts of eligibility and entitlement. A framework is developed to illustrate how recent policies have restrained the growth in social security recipient numbers by policies which have increased income support targeting. These moves have not always produced a consistently more selective system of income support, an issue which is explored with the use of an index of the degree of selectivity of social security expenditures developed specifically for this purpose.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 1991 , pp. 299 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beckerman, W. (1979), ‘The impact of income maintenance payments on poverty in Britain, 1975’, The Economic Journal, 06 261–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, B. (1986), The Case for Review of Aspects of the Austratian Social Security System, Social Security Review, Background/Discussion Paper No. 1, Canberra.Google Scholar
Cass, B. and McClelland, A. (1989), ‘Changing the terms of the welfare debate: redefining the purpose and structure of the Australian social security system’, in Saunders, P. and Jamrozik, A. (eds), Social Policy in Australia: What Future for the Welfare State?, Social Welfare Reseach Centre Reports and Proceedings No. 79, University of New South Wales, 55–77.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia (1988), Towards a Fairer Australia. Social Justice Under Labor, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service (AGPS).Google Scholar
Deacon, A. and Bradshaw, J. (1983), Reserved for the Poor: The Means Test in British Social Policy, Basil Blackwell and Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Department of Finance (1988), Report on the Forward Estimates of Budget Outlays, 1989–90 to 1991–92, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Department of Social Security (various), Annual Report, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
Department of Social Security (1983), Developments in Social Security. A Compendium of Legislative Changes Since 1908, Research Paper No. 20, Department of Social Security, Canberra.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Howe, B. (1989), Reform of Social Security Policies and Administration, 1983–1990, Canberra, AGPS.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. (1981), The Right to Welfare and Other Essays, Heinemann Educational Books, London.Google Scholar
OECD (1985), Social Expenditure 1960–1990: Problems of Growth and Control, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (1988), Reforming Public Pensions, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1987a), ‘Past developments and future prospects for social security in Australia’, in Saunders, P. and Jamrozik, A. (eds), Social Welfare in the Late 1980s: Reform, Progress, or Retreat?, Social Welfare Research Centre, Reports and Proceedings No. 65, University of New South Wales, 13–44.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1987b), ‘The changing nature and effects of the Australian social security system’, in The Welfare State: Achievements, Problems, Prospects, Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 51, 05 57–67.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1987c), Growth in Australian Social Security Expenditures, 1959–60 to 1985–86, Social Security Review Background/Discussion Paper No. 19, Canberra.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1989), ‘Towards an understanding of Commonwealth social expenditure trends’, Social Welfare Research Centre, Discussion Paper No. 11, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Saunders, P., Bradbury, B. and Whiteford, P. (1989), ‘Assessing social security developments and reform proposals’, mimeo, Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1976), ‘Universal and selective social services’, in Commitment to Welfare, Second Edition, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Whiteford, P., Bradbury, B. and Saunders, P. (1989), ‘Poverty traps in the Australian social security system’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 19: 1, 03 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteford, P. and Doyle, J. (1989), ‘Take-up of Family Income Supplement’, mimeo, Social Welfare Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar