Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:12:20.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Selective Flexicurity’ in Segmented Labour Markets: The Case of Italian ‘Mid-Siders’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2010

MATTEO JESSOULA ,
PAOLO R. GRAZIANO  and
ILARIA MADAMA
MATTEO JESSOULA*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Studies, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan
PAOLO R. GRAZIANO
Affiliation:
Department of Institutional Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan email: [email protected]
ILARIA MADAMA
Affiliation:
Department of Labour and Welfare Studies, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan email: [email protected]
*
email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article is focused on the analysis of flexicurity arrangements in the Italian case with a twofold aim. The first aim is substantive: analysing and evaluating recent labour market reforms in Italy with particular reference to the possible emergence of a new flexicurity model. The second goal is to contribute to the debate on labour market development and flexicurity by enriching and refining the available analytical tools. More specifically, we argue that the traditional conceptual ‘lenses’ focusing on the ‘insiders’/‘outsiders’ divide are inadequate to grasp the ongoing changes in the Italian labour market. This leads us to identify a third category of workers, the ‘mid-siders’, who are increasingly relevant in the Italian case and may prove to be relevant in other labour markets too. Moreover, we introduce the concept of ‘selective flexicurity’, referring to the fact that in the Italian case flexibility and security measures have been applied differently across the various categories of workers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 561 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baglioni, S., della Porta, D. and Graziano, P. (2008), ‘The contentious politics of unemployment: the Italian case in comparative perspective’, European Journal of Political Research, 47: 6, 827–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, S. and Wilthagen, A. C. J. M. (2008), ‘Flexicurity: a European approach to labour market policy’, Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 43: 2, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consiglio Nazionale dell'Economia e del Lavoro [CNEL] (2007), Il Mercato del Lavoro 2006, Rome: Consiglio Nazionale dell'Economia e del Lavoro.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The southern model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 1: 17–37.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2004), ‘La protezione contro la disoccupazione in Europa: osservazioni comparate e implicazioni per l'Italia’, in ISFOL, Sistemi di welfare e gestione del rischio economico di disoccupazione, Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2006), Le politiche sociali. L'Italia in prospettiva comparata, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (ed.) (2005), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece, London: Routledge/EUI Studies in the Political Economy of Welfare.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. and Gualmini, E. (2004), Rescued by Europe? Italy's Social Policy Reforms from Maastricht to Berlusconi, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Geroldi, G. (2005), ‘Il sistema degli ammortizzatori sociali in Italia: aspetti critici e ipotesi di riforma’, in Onofri, P. and Giannini, S. (eds.), Per lo sviluppo. Fisco e welfare, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Graziano, P. (2004a), ‘Europeanisation and Italian unemployment policy in the ‘90s: more change than continuity?’, Working Paper presented at the Final COST A15 conference, Reforming Social Protection Systems in Europe: Co-ordination and Diversity, Final COSTA15 conference.Google Scholar
Graziano, P. (2004b), Europeizzazione e politiche pubbliche italiane: Lavoro e coesione a confronto, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Graziano, P. (2007), ‘Adapting to the European employment strategy? Recent developments in Italian employment policy’, International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 4: 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, P. R. (2009), ‘Choosing welfare or loosing social citizenship? Citizens’ free choice in recent Italian welfare state reforms’, Social Policy and Administration, 43: 6, 601–16.Google Scholar
Gualmini, E. (1998), La politica del lavoro, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S. and Schwander, H. (2009), ‘Identifying outsiders across countries: similarities and differences in the patterns of dualisation’, REC-WP 09/2009, Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, W. (1995), The State We're In, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Ichino, P. (1982), Il collocamento impossibile, Bari: De Donato.Google Scholar
ISFOL (2004), Sistemi di welfare e gestione del rischio economico di disoccupazione, Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
ISTAT (2007), Indagine multiscopo, Roma.Google Scholar
Jessoula, M. (2010), ‘Recalibrating the Italian welfare state: a politics too weak for a “necessary” policy?’, in Giuliani, M. and Jones, E. (eds.), Italian Politics 2010, Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Jessoula, M. and Alti, T. (2010), ‘Italy: an uncompleted departure from Bismarck’, in Palier, B. (ed.), A Long Good Bye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Madama, I. and Sacchi, S. (2007), ‘Le tutele sociali degli occupati in nuove forme di lavoro’, Rivista di Diritto della Sicurezza Sociale, 3: 557–91.Google Scholar
Madsen, P. K. (2002), ‘The Danish model of flexicurity: a paradise – with some snakes’, in Sarfati, H. and Bonoli, G. (eds.), Labour Market and Social Protections Reforms in International Perspective: Parallel or Converging Tracks?, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ministero del Welfare (2001), Libro bianco sul mercato del lavoro, Rome: Ministero del Welfare.Google Scholar
Ministero del Welfare (2005), Rapporto di monitoraggio 2004, Rome: Ministero del Welfare.Google Scholar
Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali (2008), Rapporto di monitoraggio delle politiche occupazionali e del lavoro, Rome: Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali.Google Scholar
Samek Lodovici, M. and Semenza, R. (2008), ‘The Italian case: from employment regulation to welfare reforms?’, Social Policy and Administration, 2: 160–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F. (2005), ‘Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know?’, European Journal of Political Economy, 21: 3, 598–642.Google Scholar
Sestito, P. and Pirrone, S. (2006), Disoccupati in Italia: Tra stato, regioni e cacciatori di teste, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Viebrock, E. and Clasen, J. (2009), ‘Flexicurity and welfare reform: a review’, Socio-Economic Review, 7: 2, 305–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilthagen, T. (1998), ‘Flexicurity: a new paradigm for labour market policy reform?’, WZB discussion paper, FS I: 98–203.Google Scholar
Wilthagen, A. C. J. M. (2005), ‘Striking a balance: flexibility and security in European labour markets’, in Bredgaard, T. and Larsen, F. (eds.), Employment Policy from Different Angles, Copenhagen: Djof Publishing.Google Scholar