Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:46:27.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postmodernism, Welfare and Radical Politics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Tony Fitzpatrick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that postmodernist theory is something which students of social policy should neither accept uncritically nor dismiss out of hand. Firstly, the article takes issue with the responses made to postmodernist theory by Ramesh Mishra and Peter Taylor-Gooby. Secondly, it argues that the ideas loosely known as ‘reflexive modernisation’ constitute a more measured and critical response, though such ideas are likely to be of little use to social policy research in the absence of any reference to a left-right spectrum. Thirdly, it argues that by combining reflexive modernisation with a left-right spectrum, a decentred conception of welfare emerges which could be of value to a radical left politics. Finally, it argues for a Citizen's Income as a reform proposal which has the potential to establish such a system of decentred welfare.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 303 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A. B. (1989), Poverty and Social Security, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1991), Social Insurance, Discussion Paper WSP/65. The Welfare State Programme – Suntory-Toyota International, London.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1993), Beveridge, the National Minimum and its Future In A European Context, Discussion Paper WSP/85, The Welfare State Programme – Suntory-Toyota International, London.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (1994), Reflexive Modernization, Polity Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berman, M. (1982), All That Is Solid Melts Into Air, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Cass, B. (1991), ‘Expanding the concept of social justice: implications for social security’, in Adler, M., Bell, C. and Sinfield, A. (eds.), The Sociology of Social Security, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Commission on Social Justice (1994), Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal, Vintage. London.Google Scholar
Drolet, M. (1994), ‘The wild and the sublime: Lyotard's post-modern politics’. Political Studies, 42: 2, 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1987), ‘Comment on Van der Veen and Van Parijs’. Theory and Society, 15: 4, 709–21.Google Scholar
Esping-Anderson, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (1995), ‘Seeming contradictions: parliamentary and extra-parliamentary politics of opposition’, in Lovenduski, J. and Stanyer, J. (eds.), Contemporary Political Studies 1995, Proceedings of the Annual Conference held at the University of York, 18–20 April, The Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Belfast.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1994), Beyond Left and Right, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hemming, R. (1984), Poverty and Incentives, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hill, M. (1990). Social Security Policy In Britain, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1994), Associative Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1991), Postmodernism, Or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. (1980), Late-Modern Architecture, Academy Editions, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (1973), ‘The guaranteed income as an environmental measure’, in Daly, H. E. (ed.), Toward A Steady-State Economy, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (1987), Rethinking Welfare, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (1990), New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, Verso, London.Google Scholar
LeGrand, J. (1982), The Strategy of Equality, George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
McKay, A. and VanEvery, J. (1995), ‘Thoughts on a feminist argument for basic income’, Department of Economics, Discussion Series no. 27, Glasgow Caledonian University.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. (1993), ‘Social policy in the postmodern world’, in Jones, C. (ed.), New Perspectives on the Welfare State In Europe, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (1991) (ed.), Basic Income and the Labour Market, BIRG Discussion Paper No. 1, London.Google Scholar
Poster, M. (1988) (ed.), Baudrillard: Selected Writings. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roche, M. (1992), Rethinking Citizenship, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Squires, J. (1993) (ed.). Principled Positions, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1994), ‘Postmodernism and social policy: a great leap backwards?’, Journal of Social Policy, 23: 3, 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touraine, A. (1995), Critique of Modernity, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Unger, R. (1987), False Necessity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1991), ‘Why surfers should be fed: the liberal case for an unconditional basic income’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20: 2, 1–32.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1995), Real Freedom For All: What (if anything) Can Justify Capitalism?, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, R. J. and Van Parijs, P. (1987), ‘A capitalist road to communism’, Theory and Society, 15: 4, 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar