Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:58:13.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paradigms of Poverty: A Reply to Peter Townsend and Hugh McLachlan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

John Veit-Wilson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1986 , pp. 503 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

REFERENCES

Briggs, A. (1961), Social Thought and Social Action: A Study of the Work of Seebohm Rowntree, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1901), Poverty: A Study of Town Life, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1903). The ‘Poverty Line’: A Reply (no publisher or date printed; Briggs [1961] gives 1903 but British Library of Political and Economic Science catalogue gives 1901).Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, Penguin, Harmondsworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1986), ‘Paradigms of Poverty: A Rehabilitation of B.S. Rowntree’. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar