Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:48:52.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paradigms of Poverty: A Rehabilitation of B.S. Rowntree*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

J. H. Veit-Wilson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rowntree is widely regarded as having originated in 1901 the ‘scientific’ definition of poverty as the minimum income level required for physical subsistence. He is quoted as defining ‘secondary poverty’ above this income level as mismanagement. Critics of this approach confuse Rowntree's use of concepts with his discussion of causes, and they overlook Rowntree's own explanation that his concept of poverty was relativistic life-style, and that his distinction between primary and secondary poverty was a heuristic device to convince individualists that the life-style of the poor was at least in part caused by low income and not by improvidence. Townsend's major life work in defining and measuring poverty as relative deprivation is usually presented as overthrowing Rowntree's paradigm. The paper shows that Rowntree's early views and methods have been widely misunderstood by later authors, and it argues that the evidence necessitates a reconsideration of Rowntree's position, which would show Townsend's achievement as a paradigmatic shift not from absolutist to relativistic models of poverty but from relativistic models based on standards prescribed by expert observers to relativistic models based on standards derived from the whole population by social surveys.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 69 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aronson, N. (1984), The Making of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Family Budget Series: Relativism and the Rhetoric of Subsistence, Paper presented to the American Sociological Association Meetings,San Antonio.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B., Corlyon, J., Maynard, A.K., Sutherland, H. and Trinder, C.G. (1981), ‘Poverty in York: A re-analysis of Rowntree's 1950 survey’, Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 33, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoud, R. and Brown, J. (1981), Poverty and the Development of Anti-Poverty: Policy in the United Kingdom, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Beveridge, W. (1942), Social Insurance and Allied Services, Cmd 6404, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Booth, C. (1892), Life and Labour of the People of London, Volume 1, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Bowley, A.L. and Burnett-Hurst, A.R. (1915), Livelihood and Poverty: A Study in the Economic and Social Conditions of Working-Class Households in Northampton, Warrington, Stanley, Reading (and Bolton), King, London.Google Scholar
Bowley, A.L. and Hogg, M.H. (1925), Has Poverty Diminished?, King, London.Google Scholar
Briggs, A. (1961), Social Thought and Social Action: A Study of the Work of Seebohm Rowntree, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Brown, M. (1982), Introduction to Social Administration in Britain, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Brown, M. and Madge, N. (1982), Despite the Welfare State, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Coates, K. and Silburn, R. (1970), Poverty: The Forgotten Englishmen, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, R.W. (1960), ‘Seebohm Rowntree's contribution to the study of poverty’, Advancement of Science, Vol. 16, 189–96.Google Scholar
Evans, E.J. (ed.) (1978), Social Policy 1830–1914, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Field, F. (1982), Poverty and Politics, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
George, V. (1973), Social Security and Society, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Hagenbuch, W. (1958), Social Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1977), William Beveridge: A Biography, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holman, R. (1978), Poverty, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. (1972), Poverty, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, J.C. (1973), Poverty and Equality in Britain, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
McLachlan, H.V. (1983), ‘Townsend and the concept of “Poverty”’, Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 17, No. 2, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. (1981a), The Right to Welfare and Other Essays, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. (1981b), ‘Poverty or deprivation?’, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 81–7.Google Scholar
Meade, J.E. (1972), ‘Poverty in the welfare state’, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 24, No. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencher, S. (1967), ‘The problem of measuring poverty’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1–12.Google Scholar
Nash, R. (1902), How the Poor Live, Women's Co-operative Guild, Manchester.Google Scholar
Rein, M. (1970), ‘Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty’, in Townsend, 1970, pp. 46–63.Google Scholar
Rodgers, B. (1969), The Battle Against Poverty, Volume 1, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Rose, M.E. (1972), The Relief of Poverty, 1834–1914, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1901), Poverty: A Study of Town Life, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1903), The ‘Poverty Line’: A Reply (no publisher or date printed; Briggs [1961] gives 1903 but British Library of Political and Economic Science catalogue gives 1901).Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1937), The Human Needs of Labour, Longmans Green, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. (1941), Poverty and Progress, Longmans Green, London.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B.S. and Kendall, M. (1913). How the Labourer Lives, Thomas Nelson and Sons, London.Google Scholar
Simey, T. and Simey, M. (1960), Charles Booth, Social Scientist, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thane, P. (1982), The Foundations of the Welfare State, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R.M. (1958), ‘The social division of welfare’, in Essays on the Welfare State, George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 34–5.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1954), ‘Measuring poverty’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 130–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. (1962), ‘The meaning of poverty’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol 18, No. 3, 210–27.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (ed.)(1970), The Concept of Poverty, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, Penguin, Harmondsworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1981), ‘Measuring poverty’, New Society, Vol. 58, No. 986, 76.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1982), ‘The concept of “poverty” in the work of B. Seebohm Rowntree and P. Townsend’, Transactions of the 1981 Annual Conference, British Sociological Association, London.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1984), ‘Seebohm Rowntree’, in Barker, P. (ed.), Founders of the Welfare State, Heinemann, London, pp. 75–82.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, J.H. (1985), Supplementary Benefit: What Is To Be Done?, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Walker, C.L. and Church, M. (1978), ‘Poverty by administration: A review of supplementary benefits, nutrition and scale rates’, Journal of Human Nutrition, Vol. 32, 5–18.Google ScholarPubMed