Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:46:44.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kathy Arthurson (2012), Social Mix and the City: Challenging the Mixed Communities Consensus in Housing and Urban Planning Policies. Collingwood, Australia: CIRSO. £48.95, pp. 141, pbk.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2012

DAVID MANLEY*
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeLuca, S., Duncan, G., Mendenhall, R. and Keels, M. (2011), ‘The notable and the null: using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs’, in Van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L. and Maclennan, D. (eds.), Neighbourhood Effects: New Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Johnston, C. (2003) ‘Tendencies, community and the (re)development of public housing estate – a background paper’, Shelter, Sydney, New South Wales.Google Scholar
Small, M. L. and Feldman, J. (2012), ‘Ethnographic evidence, heterogeneity, and neigbourhood effects after moving to opportunity’, in Van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L. and Maclennan, D. (eds.), Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 5777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ham, M. and Manley, D. (2010), ‘The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on labour market outcomes: a longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects’, Journal of Economic Geography, 10: 2, 257–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1986), The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar