Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:48:48.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immigrant Integration Through Volunteering: The Importance of Contextual Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2018

ITAY GREENSPAN Open the ORCID record for ITAY GREENSPAN [Opens in a new window] ,
MARLENE WALK  and
FEMIDA HANDY
ITAY GREENSPAN
Affiliation:
School of Social Work & Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel91905 email: [email protected]
MARLENE WALK
Affiliation:
School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States email: [email protected]
FEMIDA HANDY
Affiliation:
School of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Volunteering is an under-studied yet potentially beneficial avenue for immigrant integration. Whereas past research has provided important insights into the benefits of immigrant volunteering, it has been frequently based on convenience samples. This paper contributes to the literature on immigrant volunteering on two levels. First, we test less explored questions: the differences between immigrant and native-born volunteers on several volunteer indicators, and the contextual factors (cultural, social, and organisational) associated with immigrants’ proclivity to volunteer. Second, we rely on a representative sample of the German population, and use propensity score matching to strengthen the robustness of our analysis. Findings suggest that, although native-born individuals display higher rates of volunteering than immigrants, they do not significantly differ on most indicators once immigrants become volunteers. Furthermore, time since migration, social networks and organisational membership are significant drivers of immigrant volunteering. Our findings are a signal for policymakers because social policies could better address contextual and organisational barriers.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , October 2018 , pp. 803 - 825
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akboga, S. (2017), The current state of volunteering in Turkey. In: Butcher, J. and Einolf, C.J. (Eds.), Perspectives on volunteering: voices from the south (pp. 245–261), Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Alscher, M., Dathe, D., Priller, E. and Speth, R. (2009), Bericht zur Lage und zu den Perspektiven des bürgerschaftlichen Engagements in Deutschland, Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
Anheier, H.K. and Salamon, L.M. (1999), ‘Volunteering in cross-national perspective: initial comparisons’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 62, 4, 43–65.Google Scholar
Austin, P.C. (2011), ‘An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 3, 399–424.Google Scholar
Backhaus-Maul, H. and Speck, K. (2011), ‘Freiwilligenagenturen in Deutschland’, Nachrichtendienst des Deutschen Vereins für öffentliche und private Fürsorge, 91, 302–308.Google Scholar
BAGFA. (2018), Freiwilligenagenturen, Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Freiwilligenagenturen e.V.Google Scholar
Baert, S. and Vujic, S. (2016), ‘Immigrant volunteering: a way out of labour market discrimination?’, Economics Letters, 146, 95–98.Google Scholar
BBM. (2016), Einwanderungsland Deutschland, Berlin: Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Migration.Google Scholar
Becker, P.E. and Dhingra, P.H. (2001), ‘Religious involvement and volunteering: implications for civil society’, Sociology of Religion, 62, 315–35.Google Scholar
Bendel, P. (2014), Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany: mainstreaming at the federal and local levels, Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.Google Scholar
Berry, J.W. (1997), ‘Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation’, Applied Psychology, 46, 1, 5–34.Google Scholar
Beyerlein, K. and Hipp, J.R. (2006), ‘From pews to participation: the effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement’, Social Problems, 53, 1, 97–117.Google Scholar
BMFSFJ. (2016), Engagementstrategie BMFSFJ Strategische Ausrichtung der Engagementpolitik, Berlin: BMFSFJ.Google Scholar
Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S. (2008), ‘Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 1, 31–72.Google Scholar
Carabain, C.L. and Bekkers, R. (2011), ‘Religious and secular volunteering: a comparison between immigrants and non-immigrants in the Netherlands’, Voluntary Sector Review, 2, 1, 23–41.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (1996), The rise of the network society: economy, society and culture. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chadderton, C. (2016), ‘Volunteering, social cohesion and race: the German Technical Relief Service’, Voluntary Sector Review, 7, 3, 233–249.Google Scholar
Clary, E.G. and Snyder, M. (1999), ‘The motivations to volunteer: theoretical and practical considerations’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 5, 156–159.Google Scholar
Cook, J., Dwyer, P. and Waite, L.J. (2012), ‘Accession 8 migration and the proactive and defensive engagement of social citizenship’, Journal of Social Policy, 41, 2, 329–347.Google Scholar
Corrigan, O. (2010), ‘Migrants, welfare systems and social citizenship in Ireland and Britain: users or abusers?’, Journal of Social Policy, 39, 3, 415–437.Google Scholar
Couton, P. and Gaudet, S. (2008), ‘Rethinking social participation: the case of immigrants in Canada’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 9, 1, 21–44.Google Scholar
Cnaan, R.A. (2002), The invisible caring hand: American congregations and the provision of welfare, NY: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Cuskelly, G. (2004), ‘Volunteer retention in community sport organizations’, European Sport Management Quarterly, 4, 2, 59–76.Google Scholar
DG-EAC. (2010), Volunteering in the European Union, Directorate General Education and Culture.Google Scholar
Eicken, J. and Schmitz-Veltin, A. (2010), ‘Die Entwicklung der Kirchenmitglieder in Deutschland’, Wirtschaft und Statistik, 6, 576–589.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Facchini, G., Patacchini, E. and Steinhardt, M.F. (2015), ‘Migration, friendship ties, and cultural assimilation’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117, 2, 619–649.Google Scholar
Garkisch, M., Heidingsfelder, J. and Beckmann, M. (2017), ‘Third sector organizations and migration: a systematic literature review’, Voluntas, 28, 5, 1839–1880.Google Scholar
Gensicke, T. and Geiss, S (2010), Hauptbericht des Freiwilligensurveys 2009, Berlin: Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.Google Scholar
Gerhards, J., Hans, S. and Schupp, J. (2016), ‘German public opinion on admitting refugees’, DIW Economic Bulletin, 21, 243–249.Google Scholar
GHK. (2010), Study on volunteering in the European Union: country report Germany.Google Scholar
Handy, F., Cnaan, R.A., Brudney, J.L., Ascoli, U., Meijs, L.C. and Ranade, S. (2000), ‘Public perception of “who is a volunteer”: an examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective’, Voluntas, 11, 1, 45–65.Google Scholar
Handy, F. and Greenspan, I. (2009), ‘Immigrant volunteering: a stepping stone to integration?’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 6, 956–982.Google Scholar
Haski-Leventhal, D., Meijs, L.C. and Hustinx, L. (2010), ‘The third-party model: enhancing volunteering through governments, corporations and educational institutes’, Journal of Social Policy, 39, 1, 139–158.Google Scholar
Haski-Leventhal, D., Meijs, L.C., Lockstone‐Binney, L., Holmes, K. and Oppenheimer, M. (2017), ‘Measuring volunteerability and the capacity to volunteer among non-volunteers: implications for social policy’, Social Policy & Administration, doi: 10.1111/spol.12342.Google Scholar
Hong, S. and Morrow-Howell, N. (2010), ‘Health outcomes of Experience Corps: a high-commitment volunteer program’, Social Science & Medicine, 71, 2, 414–420.Google Scholar
Howard-Ecklund, E. (2005), ‘Models of civic responsibility: Korean Americans in congregations with different ethnic compositions’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 1, 15– 28.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D., Swyngedouw, M., Hanquinet, L. et al. (2009), ‘The challenge of measuring immigrant origin and immigration-related ethnicity in Europe’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 10, 1, 67–88.Google Scholar
Kanas, A., Van-Tubergen, F. and Van der Lippe, T. (2011), ‘The role of social contacts in the employment status of immigrants: A panel study of immigrants in Germany’, International Sociology, 26, 1, 95–122.Google Scholar
Karakayali, S. and Kleist, O. (2015), EFA-Studie: Strukturen und Motive der ehrenamtlichen Flüchtlingsarbeit in Deutschland, Berlin: BIM.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. and Brudney, J.L. (2012), ‘Participation in formal and informal volunteering: implications for volunteer recruitment’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23, 2, 159–180.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. and Moon, S.-G. (2011), ‘Mainstream and ethnic volunteering by Korean immigrants in the United States’, Voluntas, 22, 4, 811–830.Google Scholar
Manatschal, A. (2015), ‘Reciprocity as a trigger of social cooperation in contemporary immigration societies?’, Acta Sociologica, 58, 3, 233–248.Google Scholar
Manatschal, A. and Freitag, M. (2014), ‘Reciprocity and volunteering’, Rationality and society, 26, 2, 208–235.Google Scholar
Meier, S. and Stutzer, A. (2008), ‘Is volunteering rewarding in itself?’, Economica, 75, 39– 59.Google Scholar
Musick, M.A. and Wilson, J. (2008), Volunteers: a social profile, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Osili, U.O. and Xie, J. (2009), ‘Do immigrants and their children free ride more than natives?’, American Economic Review, 99, 2, 28–34.Google Scholar
Phillimore, J. (2012), ‘Implementing integration in the UK: lessons for integration theory, policy and practice’, Policy & Politics, 40, 4, 525–545.Google Scholar
Portes, A. (1998), ‘Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1, 1–24.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (2000), Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Qvist, H-P.Y. (2017), ‘Secular and religious volunteering among immigrants and natives in Denmark’, Acta Sociologica, DOI: 10.1177/0001699317717320.Google Scholar
Reuters (2017, August 1), Immigrant population hits new high in Germany.Google Scholar
Ruiter, S. and De Graaf, N.D. (2006), ‘National context, religiosity, and volunteering: results from 53 countries’, American Sociological Review, 71, 2, 191–210.Google Scholar
Schmiade, N., Müller, D., Kausmann, C., Vogel, C., Ziegelmann, J. P. and Simonson, J. (2014), German survey on volunteering, Berlin: DZA.Google Scholar
Schoeneberg, U. (1985), ‘Participation in ethnic associations: the case of immigrants in West Germany’, International Migration Review, 19, 3, 416–437.Google Scholar
Schürmann, L.K. (2013), Freiwilliges engagement. In: Motivation und Anerkennung im freiwilligen Engagement (pp. 19–28), Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Simonson, J., Ziegelmann, J.P., Vogel, C. and Tesch-Römer, C. (2016), Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland: Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2014, Berlin: BMFSFJ.Google Scholar
Simsa, R., Auf, M., Bratke, S.M. et al. (2016), Contributions of civil society to deal with the refugee crisis: services and learning opportunities, Vienna: WU of Economics and Business.Google Scholar
Sinha, J.W., Greenspan, I. and Handy, F. (2011), ‘Volunteering and civic participation among immigrant members of ethnic congregations: complementary not competitive’, Journal of Civil Society, 7, 1, 23–40.Google Scholar
Strokosch, K. and Osborne, S.P. (2016), ‘Asylum-seekers and the co-production of public services: understanding the implications for social inclusion and citizenship’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
Sundeen, R.A., Garcia, C. and Wang, L. (2007), ‘Volunteer behavior among Asian American groups in the United States’, Journal of Asian American Studies, 10, 3, 243–281.Google Scholar
Thomsen, S., Walter, T. and Aldashev, A. (2013), ‘Short-term training programs for immigrants in the German welfare system: do effects differ from natives and why?’, IZA Journal of Migration, 2, 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, F. (2010), ‘Marking difference and negotiating belonging: refugee women, volunteering and employment’, Gender, Work and Organization, 17, 3, 278–296.Google Scholar
Triadafilopoulos, T. and Schönwälder, K. (2006), ‘How the Federal Republic became an immigration country: norms, politics and the failure of West Germany's guest worker system’, German Politics and Society, 24, 3, 1–19.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E.M. and Conley, R.S. (2003), ‘Civic engagement and particularized trust: the ties that bind people to their ethnic communities’, American Politics Research, 31, 4, 331–360.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E. (1995), Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Voicu, B. (2014), ‘Participative immigrants or participative cultures? the importance of cultural heritage in determining involvement in associations’, Voluntas, 25, 3, 612–635.Google Scholar
Walk, M., Greenspan, I., Crossley, H. and Handy, F. (2014b), Canadian immigrants and their access to services: A case study of a social purpose enterprise. In: Social purpose enterprises (pp. 162–187), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Walk, M., Schinnenburg, H. and Handy, F. (2014a), ‘Missing in action: strategic human resource management in German nonprofits’, Voluntas, 25, 4, 991–1021.Google Scholar
Wang, L. and Handy, F. (2014), ‘Religious and secular voluntary participation by immigrants in Canada: how trust and social networks affect decision to participate’, Voluntas, 25, 6, 1559–1582.Google Scholar
Warburton, J. and Smith, J. (2003), ‘Out of the generosity of your heart: are we creating active citizens through compulsory volunteer programmes for young people in Australia?’, Social Policy & Administration, 37, 7, 772–786.Google Scholar
Wiepking, P. and Handy, F. (2015), The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (2012), ‘Volunteerism research: a review essay’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 2, 176–212.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. and Ngai, N.-P. (2009), ‘Moral resources and political capital: theorizing the relationship between voluntary service organizations and the development of civil society in China’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 2, 247–269.Google Scholar
Zimmer, A., Gärtner, J., Priller, E. et al. (2004), The legacy of subsidiarity: The nonprofit sector in Germany. In: Future of civil society (pp. 681–711), Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Greenspan et al. supplementary material

Online Appendices 1-3

Download Greenspan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 148 KB