Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:53:01.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Does Decentralisation Affect the Welfare State? Territorial Politics and the Welfare State in the UK and US

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

SCOTT L. GREER
SCOTT L. GREER*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between political decentralisation and the welfare state is much studied, and large-scale studies have repeatedly found that decentralised states have less generous welfare states. How do we fit that with other studies that emphasise the potential of decentralisation to raise welfare standards? This article argues that decentralisation, as a variable, is too broad and it is more efficient to focus on the structure of veto players in the central state, intergovernmental relations and intergovernmental finance. Those are the actual mechanisms that connect decentralisation to the welfare states, and they can all vary independently of decentralisation. It uses recent changes in the United States and United Kingdom as examples. The fragmentation and average weakness of the US welfare state is mostly due to a federal government riddled with internal veto points that permits considerable interstate variation and low overall average provision, while tight central control on finances in the UK means that most variation is in the organisation, rather than levels, of social services.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 181 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. (ed.) (2005), Devolution in Practice II: Public Policy Differences around the UK, Newcastle: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Adams, J. and Robinson, P. (eds.) (2002), Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Aldridge, J. (2008), ‘Financing devolution: 2008 and beyond’, in Trench, A. (ed.), The State of the Nations 2008, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. L. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Rosete, A., Bevan, G., Mays, N. and Dixon, J. (2005), ‘Effect of diverging policy across the NHS’, British Medical Journal, 331: 946–50.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K., Bertozzi, F. and Bonoli, G. (2004), ‘Swiss worlds of welfare’, West European Politics, 27: 20–44.Google Scholar
Bagehot, W. (1867), The English Constitution, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Banting, K. G. (1999), ‘Social citizenship and the multicultural welfare state’, in Cairns, A. C., Courtney, J. C., MacKinnon, P., Michelmann, H. J. and Smith, D. E. (eds.), Citizenship, Diversity and Pluralism: Canadian and Comparative Perspectives, Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Banting, K. G. and Corbett, S. (2002), ‘Health policy and federalism: an introduction’, in Banting, K. G. and Corbett, S. (eds.), Health Policy and Federalism: A Comparative Perspective on Multi-Level Governance, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Lecours, A. (2008), Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bensel, R. F. (1990), Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1977, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bevan, G. and Hamblin, R. (2009), ‘Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: impacts of different systems of performance measurement within the UK’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 172: 1–30.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V. (2007), ‘Social democracy’, in Seldon, A. (ed.), Blair's Britain 1997–2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (2007), Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. D. (2005), ‘Incrementalism adds up?’, in Morone, J. A. and Brown, L. D. (eds.), Healthy, Wealthy, and Fair: Health Care and the Good Society, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R. (1978), ‘The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis’, American Political Science Review, 72: 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. L. and Morgan, K. J. (2005), ‘Federalism and the politics of old-age care in Germany and the United States’, Comparative Political Studies, 38: 887–914.Google Scholar
Carmichael, P., Knox, C. and Osborne, R. (eds.) (2007), Devolution and Constitutional Change in Northern Ireland, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (1999), ‘Decentralization and the post-war political economy’, European Journal of Political Research, 36: 27–53.Google Scholar
Commission on a High Performance Health System (2007), Aiming Higher: Results from a State Scorecard on Health System Performance, New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
Conover, P. J., Crewe, I. M. and Searing, D. D. (1991), ‘The nature of citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: empirical comments on theoretical themes’, Journal of Politics, 53: 800–32.Google Scholar
Fargion, V. (2000), ‘Timing and the development of social care services in Europe’, West European Politics, 23: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2005), The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, G. (2008), ‘The form and context of federalism: meanings for health care financing’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 33: 649–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. L. (ed.) (2004), Federalism and Democracy in Latin America, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, S. L. (2004), Territorial Politics and Health Policy: UK Health Policy in Comparative Perspective, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, S. L. (2006), ‘The politics of policy divergence’, in Greer, S. L. (ed.), Territory, Democracy, and Justice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Greer, S. L. (2007), ‘The fragile divergence machine: citizenship, policy divergence, and intergovernmental relations’, in Trench, A. (ed.), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, S. L. (ed.) (2009), Devolution and Social Citizenship in the UK, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Greer, S. L. (forthcoming), ‘Options and the lack of options: health politics and policy’, forthcoming, Political Quarterly, 80.Google Scholar
Greer, S. L. and Jacobson, P. (forthcoming), ‘Federalism and health policy’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 35.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. and Pierson, P. (2005), Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, S. B. (2006), Globalization and the Politics of Pay, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hazell, R. and Rawlings, R. (eds.) (2005), Devolution, Law Making and the Constitution, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Heald, D. and McLeod, A. (2002), ‘Beyond Barnett? Financing devolution’, in Adams, J. and Robinson, P. (eds.), Devolution in Practice: Public Policy Differences within the UK, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. (1999), Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. M. and Swank, D. H. (1992), ‘Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–82’, American Political Science Review, 86: 658–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, B. (2006), ‘Tell me again: why is there no national health insurance in the United States?’, Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 31: 839–48.Google Scholar
Hough, D. and Jeffery, C. (eds.) (2006), Devolution and Electoral Politics, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. D. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huber, E., Ragin, C. and Stephens, J. D. (1993), ‘Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state’, American Journal of Sociology, 99: 711–49.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. M. (1992), ‘The rules of the game: the logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden’, in Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. (2009), ‘Federalism and health care cost containment in comparative perspective’, Publius, 39: 164–86.Google Scholar
Keating, M. (2007), ‘Introduction’, in Keating, M. (ed.), Scottish Social Democracy: Progressive Ideas for Public Policy, Brussels and Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984), Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, W. S. (1952), ‘A note on the nature of federalism’, Political Science Quarterly, 67: 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddens, B. and Swenden, W. (eds.) (2009), Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Maioni, A. (1998), Parting at the Crossroads: The Emergence of Health Insurance in the United States and Canada, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maioni, A. (2002), ‘Health care in the new millennium’, in Bakvis, H. and Skogstad, G. (eds.), Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manna, P. (2006), School's In: Federalism and the National Education Agenda, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McEwen, N. (2006), ‘Does the recognition of national minorities undermine the welfare state?’, in Banting, K. G. and Kymlicka, W. (eds.), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McEwen, N. and Moreno, L. (eds.) (2005), The Territorial Politics of Welfare, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGarvey, N. and Cairney, P. (2008), Scottish Politics: An Introduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McLean, I., Lodge, G. and Schmuecker, K. (2009), ‘Social citizenship and intergovernmental finance’, in Greer, S. L. (ed.), Devolution and Social Citizenship in the UK, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. (2006), ‘Evolution and devolution: citizenship, institutions, and public policy’, Publius, 36: 153–68.Google Scholar
Moreno, L. (2001), ‘Spain, a via media of welfare development’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.), Welfare States under Pressure, London: Sage.Google Scholar
NCES (1996), Education in States and Nations: Indicators Comparing US States with Other Industrialized Countries in 1991, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Nitta, K. A. (2008), The Politics of Structural Education Reform, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W. E. (1999), ‘An essay on fiscal federalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37: 1120–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. and Castles, F. G. (2005a), ‘Bypasses to a social Europe? Lessons from federal experience’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23: 545–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. and Castles, F. G. (eds.) (2005b), Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OCED (2007), Health at a Glance, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Page, B. I. and Simmons, E. R. (2000), What Government Can Do: Dealing with Poverty and Inequality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, P. (2006), ‘The changing politics of federalism in the United States’, in Greer, S. L. (ed.), Territory, Democracy and Justice: Regionalism and Federalism in Western Democracies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1995), ‘Fragmented welfare states: federal institutions and the development of social policy’, Governance, 8: 449–78.Google Scholar
Poirier, J. (2001), ‘Pouvoir normatif et protection sociale dans les fédérations multinationales’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society/Revue Canadienne Droit et Societé, 16: 137–71.Google Scholar
Powell, M.. (ed.) (2008), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970), The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Quadagno, J. (2005), One Nation, Uninsured: Why the US Has No National Health Insurance, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C., Berg-Schlosser, D. and de Meur, G. (1996), ‘Political methodology: qualitiative methods’, in Goodin, R. E. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2003), ‘American federalism and the politics of regulation’, in Parsons, C. (ed.), Evolving Federalisms: The Intergovernmental Balance of Power in America and Europe, Syracuse: Campbell Public Affairs Institute, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. A. (2006), ‘Federalism’, in Weingast, B. and Wittman, D. A. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rom, M. C. (2006), ‘Policy races in the American states’, in Harrison, K. (ed.), Racing to the Bottom? Provincial Interdependence in the Canadian Federation, Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Rudalevidge, A. (2003), ‘No child left behind: forging a congressional compromise’, in Peterson, P. and West, M. A. (eds.), No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Simeon, Rachel (2003), ‘The long-term care decision: social rights and democratic diversity’, in Hazell, R. (ed.), The State and the Nations: The Third Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard (1972), Federal-Provincial Diplomacy: The Making of Recent Policy in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Simeon, Richard (2006), ‘Federalism and social justice: thinking through the jungle’, in Greer, S. L. (ed.), Territory, Democracy, and Justice: Regionalism and Federalism in Western Democracies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1995), Social Policy in the United States: Future Possibilities in Historical Perspective, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. R. and Evans, D. J. (2004 [2002]), ‘Privatization, devolution, and the welfare state’, in Deakin, N., Jones-Finer, C. and Matthews, B. (eds.), Welfare and the State: Critical Concepts in Political Science: Welfare Futures, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. (2004), ‘Federalism and democracy: beyond the US model’, in Amoretti, U. and Bermeo, N. (eds.), Federalism and Territorial Cleavages, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (2004), Taking Stock: Scottish Social Welfare after Devolution, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D. (2001), ‘Political institutions and welfare state restructuring: the impact of institutions on social policy change in developed democracies’, in Pierson, P. (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D. (2002), Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenden (2006), Federalism and regionalism in Western Europe: A Comparative and Thematic Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. M. (1956), ‘A pure theory of local expenditure’, Journal of Political Economy, 64: 416–25.Google Scholar
Trench, A. (2006), ‘The Government of Wales Act 2006: the next steps in devolution for Wales’, Public Law, 687–96.Google Scholar
Trench, A. (ed.) (2007), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Trench, A. (2008), Devolution and Higher Education: Impact and Future Trends, London: Universities UK.Google Scholar
Trench, A. and Jarman, H. (2007), ‘The practical outcomes of devolution: policy-making across the UK’, in Trench, A. (ed.), Devolution and Power in the United Kingdom, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, New York/Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation/Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tuohy, C. H. (1999), Accidental Logics: The Dynamics of Change in the Health Care Arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. L. (1999), Comparing Federal Systems, Kingston, ON: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queens University.Google Scholar
Watts, R. L. (2000), The Spending Power in Federal Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Kingston, ON: Queens University Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Watts, R. L. (2006), ‘Origins of cooperative and competitive federalism’, in Greer, S. L. (ed.), Territory, Democracy and Justice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (1975), The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (2002), Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy and Performance, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. and Mooney, G. (2008), ‘Decentring social policy? Devolution and the discipline of social policy: a commentary’, Journal of Social Policy, 37: 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wincott, D. (2006), ‘Social policy and social citizenship: Britain's welfare states’, Publius, 36: 169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, J. F. (2005), Congressional Preemption, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar