Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:38:39.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Unemployment and Policy Changes on America's Poor*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

First, we employ a methodology that decomposes the change in poverty into changes due to the means and variances of market and transfer incomes and to other factors which affect the shape of the income distribution. We then briefly describe the Reagan economic programme. Finally, we estimate a regression model that reflects changes in these moments of the income distribution to changes in the unemployment rates and to the Reagan programme. The regression estimates, together with the poverty rate decomposition, allow us to show that the administration's cuts in income-transfer programmes account for about 40 per cent of the recent rise in poverty and that increased unemployment accounts for about a third of the increase in poverty.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aaron, H. (1967). ‘The Foundations of the “War on Poverty” Re-examined’, American Economic Review, 57, 1229–40.Google Scholar
Anderson, W.H.L. (1964) ‘Trickle-Down: The relationship between economic growth and the extent of poverty among American families’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78, 511–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, A. and Esaki, H. (1978), ‘Macroeconomic activity and income distribution in the post-war United States’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 604–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boskin, M. (1982), ‘Reaganomics and income distribution: A longer-term perspective’, Journal of Contemporary Studies, 5 (Summer), 1730.Google Scholar
Burtless, G. (1983), ‘Testimony before the US House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means: Unemployment insurance and poverty’, Washington DC, 18 10.Google Scholar
Danziger, S. (1982), ‘Poverty and inequality under Reaganomics’, Journal of Contemporary Studies, 5, 1730.Google Scholar
Danziger, S.. Haveman, R. and Plotnick, R. (1981), ‘How income-transfer programs affect work, savings and the income distribution’, Journal of Economic Literature, 19:3, 9751028.Google Scholar
Dooley, M. and Gottschalk, P. (1984), ‘Earnings inequality among males in the US: Trends and the effect of labor force growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 92, 5989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaway, L.E. (1965), ‘The foundations of the “War on Poverty”’, American Economic Review, 55, 123–31.Google Scholar
Gallaway, L.E. (1967), ‘The foundations of the “War on Poverty ”: Reply’, American Economic Review, 57, 1241–3.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, P. and Danziger, S. (1984), ‘Macroeconomic conditions, income transfers and the trend in poverty’, in Lee, D. Bawden (ed.), The Social Contract Revisited, Urban Institute Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, P. and Danziger, S. (1985), ‘A framework for evaluating the effects of economic growth and transfers on poverty’, American Economic Review, 74 (03), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kimzey, B. (1983), Reaganomics, West Publishing, St Paul, Minn.Google Scholar
Levy, F. and Michel, R. (1983), ‘The way we'll be in 1984: Recent changes in the level and distribution of disposable income’. Urban Institute Discussion Paper, Washington DC, 11.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. and Sawhill, I. (eds)(1984), The Reagan Record, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Sawhill, I. and Stone, C (1985), ‘Economic policy’. To appear in a forthcoming Urban Institute Press volume on the Reagan experiment.Google Scholar
Thornton, J.R., Agnello, R.J. and Link, C.R. (1978), ‘Poverty and economic growth: Trickle-down peters out’, Economic Inquiry, 16, 385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means (1984), ‘Families in poverty: Changes in the safety net’, 98th Congress, 2nd Session, Committee Print No. 98–37, Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar