Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-qhdkw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-14T05:41:04.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contrasting Supply-side, Demand-side and Combined Approaches to Labour Market Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

KJETIL FRØYLAND Open the ORCID record for KJETIL FRØYLAND [Opens in a new window] ,
TONE ALM ANDREASSEN  and
SIMON INNVÆR
KJETIL FRØYLAND
Affiliation:
Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway email: [email protected]
TONE ALM ANDREASSEN
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Professions, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway email: [email protected]
SIMON INNVÆR
Affiliation:
Institute of Social Work, Faculty of Social Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In social policy discussions about activation or ALMP (Active Labour Market Policies), most attention is paid to supply-side approaches, directed towards jobless individuals. In these discussions, little attention is given to demand-side approaches aimed at activating employers, or combined workplace-oriented approaches that combine supply and demand-side elements. The aim of this article is to introduce demand-side and combined approaches developed within the fields of disability policy and vocational rehabilitation to scholarly discussions about activation and ALMP.

By comparing these three approaches, we show that demand-side and combined approaches challenge key assumptions underlying the dominant supply-side approaches. They do so by representing different views of a) work – as a right instead of a duty; b) the problem of reduced work capacity – not as individual failure, but rather as a prejudice in attitudes among employers or as a gap between capacities and demands; c) the employers and the labour market – as transformable instead of fixed.

Supply-side, demand-side and combined workplace-oriented approaches share the aim of labour market integration; however, their developments seem to have taken place largely in isolation from each other. We argue that when brought together they could form a more comprehensive base for further development of labour market integration.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 311 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anand, R. and Winters, M.-F. (2008), ‘A retrospective view of corporate diversity training from 1964 to the present’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7: 3, 356–372.10.5465/amle.2008.34251673Google Scholar
Armingeon, K. (2007), ‘Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14: 6, 905–932.10.1080/13501760701497923Google Scholar
Barak, M.M. (2000), ‘The inclusive workplace: An ecosystems approach to diversity management’, Social work, 45: 4, 339–353.10.1093/sw/45.4.339Google Scholar
Barbier, J.-C. and Ludwig-Mayerhofer, W. (2004), ‘Introduction: the many worlds of activation’, European Societies, 6: 4, 423–436.10.1080/1461669042000275845Google Scholar
Barbour, W.C. (1999), ‘Supported employment: The coming of full circle’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 13, 165–174.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. (2000), ‘A working social model? Disability, work and disability politics in the 21st century’, Critical Social Policy, 20 (4), 441–457.10.1177/026101830002000402Google Scholar
Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (2005), ‘Disability, work, and welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people’, Work, employment and society, 19, 3, 527–545.10.1177/0950017005055669Google Scholar
Baumberg, B. (2014), ‘Fit-for-Work–or Work Fit for Disabled People? The Role of Changing Job Demands and Control in Incapacity Claims’, Journal of Social Policy, 43 (2), 289–310.10.1017/S0047279413000810Google Scholar
Bell, D. and Heitmueller, A. (2009), ‘The Disability Discrimination Act in the UK: Helping or hindering employment among the disabled?’, Journal of Health Economics, 28: 2, 465–480.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.006Google Scholar
Bond, G.R. (2004), ‘Supported Employment: Evidence for an Evidence-Based Practice’, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27: 4, 345–359.10.2975/27.2004.345.359Google Scholar
Bond, G.R., Becker, D.R., Drake, R.E., Rapp, C.A., Meisler, N., Lehman, A.F., Bell, M.D. and Blyler, C.R. (2001), ‘Implementing Supported Employmentas an Evidence-Based Practice’, Psychiatric services, 52: 3, 313–322.10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.313Google Scholar
Bond, G.R., Drake, R.E., Mueser, K.T. and Becker, D.R. (1997), ‘An update on supported employment for people with severe mental illness’, Psychiatric Services, 48: 3, 335–346.Google Scholar
Bonfils, I. S., Hansen, H., Dalum, H. S. and Eplov, L. F. (2017), ‘Implementation of the individual placement and support approach – facilitators and barriers’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19, 4, 318–333.10.1080/15017419.2016.1222306Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2010), ‘The Political Economy of Active Labor-Market Policy’, Politics & Society, 38: 4, 435–457.10.1177/0032329210381235Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2011), ‘Active labour market policy in a changing economic context’, in Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (eds.), Regulating the risk of unemployment. National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2012), ‘Active labour market policy and social investment: a changing relationship’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), Towards a social investments welfare state, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bonvin, J.-M. and Galster, D. (2010), ‘Making them Employable or Capable? Social Integration Policies at a Crossroads’, in Otto, H.-U. and Ziegler, H. (eds.), Education, Welfare and the Capabilities Approach. A European Perspective., Opladen & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
Bonvin, J.-M. and Orton, M. (2009), ‘Activation policies and organisational innovation: the added value of the capability approach’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29: 11/12, 565–574.10.1108/01443330910999014Google Scholar
Bredgaard, T. (2017), ‘Employers and Active Labour Market Policies: Typologies and Evidence’, Social Policy and Society, 1–13. doi:10.1017/S147474641700015XGoogle Scholar
Brodkin, E.Z. and Marston, G. (2013), Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organizations and Workfare Politics, Baltimore: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, J., French, E. and Strachan, G. (2009), The diversity management approach to equal employment opportunity in Australian organisations: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.10.1177/103530460902000106Google Scholar
Burke, J., Bezyak, J., Fraser, R.T., Pete, J., Ditchman, N. and Chan, F. (2013), ‘Employers’ attitudes towards hiring and retaining people with disabilities: A review of the literature’, The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 19: 01, 21–38.10.1017/jrc.2013.2Google Scholar
Callahan, M., Griffin, C. and Hammis, D. (2011), ‘Twenty years of employment for persons with significant disabilities: A retrospective’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 163–172.Google Scholar
Cimera, R.E. (2012), ‘The economics of supported employment: What new data tell us’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37, 109–117.Google Scholar
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2003), ‘Unemployment protection and labour market reform in France and Great Britain in the 1990s: solidarity versus activation?’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 03, 361–381.10.1017/S0047279403007049Google Scholar
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2006), ‘Beyond activation reforming European unemployment protection systems in post-industrial labour markets’, European societies, 8: 4, 527–553.10.1080/14616690601002582Google Scholar
Corrigan, P.W. and McCracken, S.G. (2005), ‘Place First, Then Train: An Alternative to the Medical Model of Psychiatric Rehabilitation’, Social Work, 50: 1, 31–39.10.1093/sw/50.1.31Google Scholar
Dingeldey, I. (2007), ‘Between workfare and enablement – The different paths to transformation of the welfare state: A comparative analysis of activating labour market policies’, European Journal of Political Research, 46: 6, 823–851.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00712.xGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, F. (2009), Inventing equal opportunity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830893Google Scholar
Dobusch, L. (2017), ‘Gender, Dis-/ability and Diversity Management: Unequal Dynamics of Inclusion?’, Gender, Work & Organization, 24, 5, 487–505.10.1111/gwao.12159Google Scholar
Drake, R.E., Bond, G.R. and Becker, D.R. (2012), Individual placement and support: an evidence-based approach to supported employment, New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734016.001.0001Google Scholar
Edelman, L. B. (2016), Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O. and Konle-Seidl, R. (2008), Bringing the jobless into work?: experiences with activation schemes in Europe and the US, Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-77435-8Google Scholar
EUSE (2014), ‘European Union of Supported Employment Toolkit for Diversity’, http://www.eusetoolkit.eu/index.php/toolkit: European Union of Supported Employment.Google Scholar
Filges, T., Smedslund, G., Knudsen, A. and Jørgensen, A. (2015), Active Labour Market Programme Participation for Unemployment Insurance Recipients: A Systematic Review. Oslo: Campbell Systematic Reviews.Google Scholar
Fossati, F. (2017), ‘Who Wants Demanding Active Labour Market Policies? Public Attitudes towards Policies that put Pressure on the Unemployed’, Journal of Social Policy, published online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000216Google Scholar
Foster, D. and Wass, V. (2013), ‘Disability in the Labour Market: An Exploration of Concepts of the Ideal Worker and Organisational Fit that Disadvantage Employees with Impairments’, Sociology, 47, 4, 705–721.10.1177/0038038512454245Google Scholar
Graffam, J., Shinkfield, A., Smith, K. and Polzin, U. (2002), ‘Factors that influence employer decisions in hiring and retaining an employee with a disability’, Journal of vocational rehabilitation, 17: 3, 175–181.Google Scholar
Greve, B. (2009), The labour market situation of disabled people in European countries and implementation of employment policies: a summary of evidence from country reports and research studies, Leeds: The Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED).Google Scholar
Griffin, C., Hammis, D., Geary, T. and Sullivan, M. (2008), ‘Customized Employment: Where we are; where we're headed’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 28: 3, 135–139.Google Scholar
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2013), ‘Disability and Social (In)Security: Emotions, Contradictions of ‘Inclusion’ and Employment and Support Allowance’, Social Policy and Society, 12, 3, 12.10.1017/S1474746412000619Google Scholar
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2015a), Disabled people, work and welfare: Is employment really the answer?, Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447318323.001.0001Google Scholar
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2015b), ‘A right not to work and disabled people’, in Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (Eds.), Disabled people, work and welfare: Is employment really the answer?, Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447318323.001.0001Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J., Peralta, J.P. and Danermark, B. (2014), ‘The employer's perspective: employment of people with disabilities in wage subsidized employments’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16: 3, 249–266.10.1080/15017419.2013.785976Google Scholar
Halvorsen, R. and Hvinden, B. (2014), ‘Nordic reforms to improve the labour market participation of vulnerable youth: An effective new approach?’, International Social Security Review, 67: 2, 29–47.10.1111/issr.12037Google Scholar
Hartnett, H.P., Stuart, H., Thurman, H., Loy, B. and Batiste, L.C. (2011), ‘Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of workplace accommodations: Reasons to hire, retain and promote people with disabilities’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34: 1, 17–23.Google Scholar
Hauss, G. (2014), ‘Generating productive citizens or supporting the weak? Ambivalences and contradictions in working with young welfare recipients’, European Journal of Social Work, 17, 5, 656–671.10.1080/13691457.2014.954239Google Scholar
Hernandez, B., Keys, C. and Balcazar, F. (2000), ‘Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: A literature review’, Journal of rehabilitation, 66: 4, 4–16.Google Scholar
Hoque, K. and Noon, M. (2004), ‘Equal opportunities policy and practice in Britain: evaluating the ‘empty shell'hypothesis’, Work, Employment & Society, 18, 3, 481–506.10.1177/0950017004045547Google Scholar
Hvinden, B. and Halvorsen, R. (2003), ‘Which way for european disability policy?’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 5 (3), 296–312. doi:10.1080/15017410309512631Google Scholar
Immervoll, H. and Scarpetta, S. (2012), ‘Activation and employment support policies in OECD countries. An overview of current approaches’, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 1: 9, 1–22.10.1186/2193-9004-1-9Google Scholar
Ingold, J. and Stuart, M. (2015), ‘The Demand-Side of Active Labour Market Policies: A Regional Study of Employer Engagement in the Work Programme’, Journal of Social Policy, 44: 3, 443–462.10.1017/S0047279414000890Google Scholar
Ingold, J. and Valizade, D. (2017), ‘Employers' recruitment of disadvantaged groups: exploring the effect of active labour market programme agencies as labour market intermediaries’, Human Resource Management Journal, 27 (4), 530–547. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12154Google Scholar
Kaye, H.S., Jans, L.H. and Jones, E.C. (2011), ‘Why Don't Employers Hire and Retain Workers with Disabilities?’, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21: 4, 526–536.10.1007/s10926-011-9302-8Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L. (2010), ‘Labour market activation’, in Castles, F. G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H. and Pierson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kildal, N. (2001), Workfare tendencies in Scandinavian welfare policies: ILO Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, Y., Furukawa, T. A., Kinoshita, K., Honyashiki, M., Omori, I. M., Marshall, M., Bond, G.R., Huxley, P., Amano, N. and Kingdon, D. (2013), ‘Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness’, The Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews, 9, CD008297.Google Scholar
Lindsay, C., McQuaid, R.W. and Dutton, M. (2007), ‘New approaches to employability in the UK: combining ‘Human Capital Development'and ‘Work First'strategies?’, Journal of social policy, 36: 04, 539–560.10.1017/S0047279407001171Google Scholar
Lindsay, C., Greve, B., Cabras, I., Ellison, N. and Kellett, S. (2015a), ‘Assessing the evidence base on health, employability and the labour market–lessons for activation in the UK’, Social Policy & Administration, 49 (2), 143–160.10.1111/spol.12116Google Scholar
Lindsay, C., Greve, B., Cabras, I., Ellison, N. and Kellett, S. (2015b), ‘Introduction: New Perspectives on Health, Disability, Welfare and the Labour Market’, Social Policy & Administration, 49 (2), 139–142. doi:10.1111/spol.12115Google Scholar
Lødemel, I. and Moreira, A. (2014), Activation or Workfare? Governance and the Neo-Liberal Convergence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773589.001.0001Google Scholar
Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (2001), ‘An offer you can‘t refuse’, in Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (eds.) Workfare in international perspective, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Lunt, N. and Thornton, P. (1994), ‘Disability and employment: towards an understanding of discourse and policy’, Disability & Society, 9, 2, 223–238.10.1080/09687599466780231Google Scholar
Mandal, R. and Ose, S.O. (2013), ‘Social responsibility at company level and inclusion of disabled persons: the case of Norway’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 17: 2, 167–187.10.1080/15017419.2013.814586Google Scholar
Maroto, M. and Pettinicchio, D. (2014), ‘The Limitations of Disability Antidiscrimination Legislation: Policymaking and the Economic Well-being of People with Disabilities’, Law & Policy, 36: 4, 370–407.10.1111/lapo.12024Google Scholar
Martin, J. P. (2015), ‘Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: stylised facts and evidence on their effectiveness’, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4, 1, 4.10.1186/s40173-015-0032-yGoogle Scholar
McQuaid, R.W. and Lindsay, C. (2005), ‘The concept of employability’, Urban studies, 42: 2, 197–219.10.1080/0042098042000316100Google Scholar
Orton, M., Green, A., Atfield, G. and Barnes, S.A. (in press), ‘Employer participation in active labour market policy: From reactive gatekeepers to proactive strategic partners?’ Journal of Social PolicyGoogle Scholar
Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2000), ‘Beyond ‘employability”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24: 6, 729–749.10.1093/cje/24.6.729Google Scholar
Raffass, T. (2017), ‘Demanding Activation’, Journal of Social Policy, 46: 2, 349–365.10.1017/S004727941600057XGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, M., Miller, L. and Perkins, R. (2010), ‘Implementing the individual placement and support (IPS) approach for people with mental health conditions in England’, International Review of Psychiatry, 22, 2, 163–172.10.3109/09540261003720456Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R., Coleman-Fountain, E. and Trezzini, B. (2017), ‘How to enhance Active Citizenship for persons with disabilities in Europe through labour market participation’, in Halvorsen, R. and Bickenbach, J. (eds.) The Changing Disability Policy System: Active Citizenship and Disability in Europe . Volume 1. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Schur, L., Kruse, D. and Blanck, P. (2005), ‘Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities’, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23: 1, 3–20.10.1002/bsl.624Google Scholar
Schwochau, S. and Blanck, P.D. (2000), ‘The Economics of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Part III: Does the ADA Disable the Disabled?’, Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 21: 1, 271–313.Google Scholar
Smedslund, G., Dalsbø, T.K., Hagen, K.B., Johme, T., Rud, M.G. and Steiro, A. (2006), ‘Work Programmes for Welfare Recipients: A Systematic Review ‘, Campbell Collaboration, 2: 9, 124.Google Scholar
Stein, M.A. and Stein, P.J. (2007), ‘Beyond disability civil rights’, Hastings Law Journal, 58, 1203.Google Scholar
Tew, J., Ramon, S., Slade, M., Bird, V., Melton, J. and Le Boutillier, C. (2012), ‘Social Factors and Recovery from Mental Health Difficulties: A Review of the Evidence’, The British Journal of Social Work, 42: 3, 443–460.10.1093/bjsw/bcr076Google Scholar
Tyree, M., Kendrick, M.J. and Block, S. (2011), ‘Strengthening the role of the employee: An analysis of supported employment using social role valorization theory’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35: 3, 197–209.Google Scholar
van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P. and Larsen, F. (2017a), Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe: Activating the Unemployed, New York, Routledge.10.4324/9781315694474Google Scholar
van Berkel, R., Ingold, J., McGurk, P., Boselie, P. and Bredgaard, T. (2017b), ‘Editorial introduction: An introduction to employer engagement in the field of HRM. Blending social policy and HRM research in promoting vulnerable groups' labour market participation’, Human Resource Management Journal, 27 (4), 503–513. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12169Google Scholar
van der Aa, P. and van Berkel, R. (2014), ‘Innovating job activation by involving employers’, International Social Security Review, 67: 2, 11–27.10.1111/issr.12036Google Scholar
Waddell, G. and Burton, A.K. (2006), Is work good for your health and well-being?: Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Waghorn, G., Lloyd, C. and Clune, A. (2009), ‘Reviewing the theory and practice of occupational therapy in mental health rehabilitation’, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72: 7, 314–323.10.1177/030802260907200708Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2010), ‘Human capital’, in Fitzpatrick, T., Kwon, H.-J., Manning, N., Midgley, J. and Pascall, G. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Social Policy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wehman, P. (2012), ‘Supported Employment: What is it?’, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37, 139–142.Google Scholar
Welshman, J. (2010), ‘Workfare’, in Fitzpatrick, T., Kwon, H.-J., Manning, N., Midgley, J. and Pascall, G. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Social Policy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, C.C. (2010), ‘Active welfare’, in Fitzpatrick, T., Kwon, H.-J., Manning, N., Midgley, J. and Pascall, G. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Social Policy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. (2003), ‘Real Jobs, Learning Difficulties and Supported Employment’, Disability & Society, 18, 2, 99–115.10.1080/0968759032000052770Google Scholar