Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T08:46:22.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remembering and Rethinking the Social Divisions of Welfare: 50 Years On

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

KIRK MANN
KIRK MANN*
Affiliation:
School of Social Policy and Sociology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article revisits Titmuss's essay on the Social Divisions of Welfare (SDW) and reflects on its continuing relevance. Titmuss first presented the SDW in an Eleanor Rathbone Memorial lecture at Birmingham University in 1955, but it is best known from his Essays on the Welfare State published in 1958. Titmuss challenged the stereotype of ‘welfare’ as simply public welfare dependency and illustrated the different elements of the SDW. Some limitations of Titmuss's approach are identified, notably in relation to how he saw dependency arising, and revisions offered. The article provides a number of examples from the UK but also highlights some significant parallels with the SDW in the USA and Australia, the so-called ‘liberal welfare regimes’ (Esping-Andersen, 1990). Finally, it is claimed that 50 years on we need to be reminded of the insights and analytical potential of Titmuss's essay.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adema, W. and Ladaique, M. (2005), ‘Net social expenditure: employment and migration’, Working Paper no. 29, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Adler, M. (2004), ‘Combining welfare-to work measures with tax credits: a new hybrid approach to social security in the UK’, International Social Security Review, 57: 2, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agulnik, P. and Le Grand, J. (1998), ‘Tax relief and partnership pensions’, Fiscal Studies, 19: 4, November, 403–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, P. and Oakley, A. (2001), ‘Introduction’, in Alcock, P., Glennerster, H., Oakley, A. and Sinfield, A. (eds.), Welfare and Wellbeing: Richard Titmuss's Contribution to Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Arksey, H. and Glendinning, C. (2007), ‘Informal welfare’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Australian Treasury (2006), ‘Tax expenditures statement’, table B1, 172, http://www.treasury.gov.au Content ID1211.Google Scholar
Australian Treasury (2008), Tax Expenditures Statement 2007, Content ID1333, 25.01.2008, Canberra: Australian Treasury.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2007), Consuming Life, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R. (2002), Banking on Death or Investing in Life: The History and Future of Pensions, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blunkett, D. and Johnson, A. (2005), ‘A modern social dimension for europe: principles for reform’, A paper by David Blunkett, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Alan Johnson, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (24.10.2005), www.dwp.gov.uk/publications, accessed 22.11.2005.Google Scholar
Breen, R. and Cooke, L. P. (2005), ‘The persistence of the gendered division of domestic labour’, European Sociological Review, 21: 1, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M., Browne, J., Emmerson, C., Goodman, A., Muriel, A. and Telow, G. (2007), Pensioner Poverty Over the Next Decade: What Role for Tax and Benefit Reform?, Commentary no. 103. London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsden, E. and May, M. (2007), ‘Occupational welfare’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol, Policy Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2007), ‘Making British poverty history’, Speech, 16 October, http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=news.story.page&obj_id=139763&speeches=1, accessed 12.12.2007.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. (1997), ‘Leaving the Australian labour force: an extended encounter with the state’, Governance, 10: 2, 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. L. (2006), ‘The UK occupational pension system in crisis’, in Pemberton, H., Thane, P. and Whiteside, N. (eds.), Britain's Pension Crisis: History and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costello, P. (2006), ‘Continuing tax reform’, Statement by the Honourable Peter Costello MP, Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia, 09.05.2006, Australian Federal Government Budget 2006-07, http://www.budget.gov.au/2006-07/ministerial/html/treasury-02.htm, accessed 28.02.2007.Google Scholar
Craig, L. (2006), ‘Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children’, Gender and Society, 20: 2, 259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, C. and O'Connell, A. (2004), Tax Relief and Incentives for Pension Saving, London: PPI.Google Scholar
Deacon, A. (1993), ‘Richard Titmuss twenty years on’, Journal of Social Policy, 22: 2, 235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, A. (2002), Perspectives on Welfare, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, A. and Bradshaw, J. (1983), Reserved for the Poor, London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (2006), ‘Activation policies and the changing ethical foundations of welfare’, Paper presented at the Active Social Policies European Network (ASPEN) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI-REHS) conference, Brussels, 20 October.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2002), Simplicity, Security and Choice: Working and Saving for Retirement, Pensions, Green Paper, Cm.5677, London: The Stationery Office, www.dwp.gov.uk/publicationsGoogle Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2004), Simplicity, Security and Choice: Informed Choices for Working and Saving, Cm.6111, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dilnot, A. and McCrae, J. (1999), ‘The family credit system and the working families' tax credit in the United Kingdom’, Paper presented at OECD workshop on Making Work Pay, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1933), The Division of Labour in Society, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2004), ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements?’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28: 2, 261–83.Google Scholar
Employee Benefit Security Administration (EBSA) (2004), Abstract of 1999 Form 5500 Annual Reports, Washington, DC: Employee Benefit Security Administration.Google Scholar
Emmerson, C. (2005), ‘Taxes, benefits and retirement income incentives', Paper for Institute for Fiscal Studies’, Pension Policy Institute seminar ‘How does the interaction of state and private pensions affect incentives to work and save?’, 24 May, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Family Resources Survey (FRS) United Kingdom, 2004–2005 (2005), ‘National Statistics’, DWP, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/frs/2004_05/pdfonly/frs.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Holden, C. (2006), ‘The business–social policy nexus: corporate power and inputs into social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 3, 473–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fido, J. (1977), ‘The C.O.S. and social casework in London 1869–1900’, in Donadgrodzki, A. (ed.), Social Control in Nineteenth Century Britain, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Freud, D. (2007), ‘Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: options for the future of welfare to work’, an independent report for Department for Work and Pensions Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Gale, W. G., Iwry, M. J. and McDonald, G. (2006), ‘Tax analysists, tax breaks, an analysis of the Roth 401(k)’, Tax Notes, Commentary, 9 January, 163–7.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. and Mills, C. W. (1953), Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1977), Studies in Social and Political Theory, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1994), Beyond Left and Right, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1998), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gillies, V. (2007), Marginalised Mothers: Exploring Working-Class Experiences of Parenting, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. (2003), Gender, Pensions and the Lifecourse, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. and Arber, S. (1993), ‘Pension penalties: the gendered division of occupational welfare’, Work Employment and Society, 7: 1, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2002), The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J. S. and Pierson, P. (2002), ‘Business power and social policy: employers and the formation of the American welfare state’, Politics and Society, 30: 2, 277–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah, L. (1986), Inventing Retirement: The Development of Occupational Pensions in Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard (2005), Written Answer to Parliamentary Question from Chris Huhne, 24 October, col. 52W, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm051024/text/51024w13.htm#column_52Google Scholar
Henman, P. and Adler, M. (2003), ‘Information technology and the governance of social security’, Critical Social Policy, 23: 2, 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) (2006), ‘Memorandum item National Insurance relief on employer contributions’, September –Table 7.9 500 14,300, updated September 2006.Google Scholar
HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) (2007), ‘Registered pension schemes, cost of tax relief’, Table 7.9 from http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/pensions/menu.html, accessed 18.01.2008.Google Scholar
Inland Revenue/HM Treasury (2002), Simplifying the Taxation of Pensions: Increasing Choice and Flexibility for All, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. (2006), ‘Conservatives to renew their marriage vows’, The Daily Telegraph, 12 December.Google Scholar
Kemshall, H. (2002), Risk, Social Policy and Welfare, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, P. and Raban, C. (1988), Welfare Theory and Social Policy: Reform or Revolution?, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1986), Labour and Love. Women's Experience of Home and Family 1850–1940, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1997), ‘Gender and welfare regimes: further thoughts’, Social Politics, Summer, 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, M. (1998), How To Create a Competitive Market in Pensions: The International Lessons, Choice in Welfare series no. 45, London: IEA.Google Scholar
Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (2001), An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mann, K. (1994), ‘Watching the defectives: observers of the underclass in Britain, Australia and the USA’, Critical Social Policy, 41, Autumn, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, K. (2001), Approaching Retirement; Social Divisions, Welfare and Exclusion, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2006), ‘Tax breaks on track to top 50 billion’, Canberra Times, 26 December.Google Scholar
Minns, R. (2001), The Cold War in Welfare, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Morris, L. (1990), The Workings of the Household: A US–UK Comparison, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mullins, D. and Murie, A. with Leather, P. et al. (2006), Housing Policy in the UK, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neubeck, K. (2006), When Welfare Disappears: The Case for Economic Human Rights, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Offer, J. (1999), ‘Idealist thought, social policy and the rediscovery of informal care’, British Journal of Sociology, 50: 3, 467–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1998), Maintaining Prosperity in an Ageing Society: The OECD Study on the Policy Implications of Ageing, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006), Live Longer, Work Longer, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pension Trends (2006), Employer Pension Provision Highlights, London: Office of National Statistics.Google Scholar
Poster, M. (1990), The Mode of Information: Post-structuralism and Social Context, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Powell, M. (2002), ‘New labour and social justice’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Evaluating New Labour's Welfare Reforms, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Powell, M. (ed.) (2007), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, D. and Lucey, H. (2003), ‘The limits of “choice”: children and inner city schooling’, Sociology, 37: 1, 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, D. (2003) ‘Richard Titmuss: welfare as good conduct’, European Journal of Political Economy, 20: 771–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, P. J. (2005), ‘Security in pension provision: a critical analysis of UK government policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 3, 343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H. (1981), ‘Rereading Titmuss: the sexual division of welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 10: 4, 477–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, G. (2000), ‘Assessing the tax advantages of investment in superannuation’, Paper presented to the Eighth Colloquium of Superannuation Researchers, University of New South Wales, 10–11 July.Google Scholar
Rowlingson, K. (2006), ‘“Living poor to die rich”? Or “spending the kids’ inheritance”? Attitudes to assets and inheritance in later life’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 2, 175–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummery, K and Glendinning, C. (1999), ‘Negotiating needs, access and gatekeeping: developments in health and community care policies in the UK and the rights of disabled and older citizens’, Critical Social Policy, 19: 3, 335–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sass, S. A. (1997), The Promise of Private Pensions: The First Hundred Years, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. M. and Robinson, J. P. (2004), ‘Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers' and fathers' time with children’, American Journal of Sociology, 110: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, M. (ed.) (1996), The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Silver, N. (2006), ‘The trouble with final salary pensions’, Economic Affairs, 26: 4, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinfield, A. (1978), ‘Analyses in the social division of welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 7: 2, 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinfield, A. (2007), ‘Tax welfare’, in Powell, M. (ed.) Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, C. (2005), ‘Coordination points: a hidden factor in reconciling work and family life’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicker, P. (1995), Social Policy, Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1958), Essays on the Welfare State, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1962), Income Distribution and Social Change, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1964), ‘Introduction’, in Tawney, R. H. (ed.) Equality, London: Unwin Books.Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress (TUC), (2006), ‘An analysis of directors' pensions’, Pensionswatch 2006, London: TUC.Google Scholar
Turner, A., Drake, J. and Hills, J. (The Turner Commission) (2005), A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century. The Second Report of the Pensions Commission, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Vaughan, T. W. (2006), ‘Roth 401(k) on the horizon: worth the effort’, Compensation and Benefits Review, 38: 2, 52–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, B. (2004), Promoting Retirement Savings: The Bush Plan vs The Better Way, New York: The Century Foundation.Google Scholar
Weller, C. E. and Wenger, J. B. (2005), ‘Ruining retirement: how the union benefit crisis is shifting risks onto workers’, New Labor Forum, 14: 3, 81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (1989), Social Policy: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (2000), ‘Principles for recognition and respect’, in Lewis, G., Gewirtz, S. and Clarke, J. (eds.), Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage with The Open University.Google Scholar
World Bank (1994), Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005), Old-Age Income Support in the 21st Century: An International Perspective on Pension Systems and Reform, Washington, DC: World Bank (authors R. Holzmann, R. Hinz and Bank staff).Google Scholar