Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:39:52.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Obstacles to the Implementation of an Integrated National Alcohol Policy in Ireland: Nannies, Neo-Liberals and Joined-Up Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

SHANE BUTLER
SHANE BUTLER*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College, Dublin email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores how proponents of a public health model of alcohol policy have, for more than a quarter of a century, argued consistently but unsuccessfully for an integrated national alcohol policy in the Republic of Ireland. It looks in particular at the past decade, a time when increases in alcohol consumption and related problems strengthened the case for such an integrated policy, and when managerial innovations in the sphere of cross-cutting management appeared to provide a template for its implementation. A number of explanations are offered for the refusal of successive governments to respond to what its advocates see as the only rational, evidence-based approach to the prevention of alcohol problems. It is argued that, unlike the Nordic countries, the political culture of independent Ireland has never been one in which the state could unilaterally impose strict alcohol control policies as a feature of its broader vision of the welfare state. It is also argued that during the recent period of economic prosperity (the so-called ‘Celtic Tiger’ era) the country was characterised by a neo-liberal policy climate, which was specifically antipathetic to the idea that the state should interfere directly in the alcohol market with a view to preventing related problems. It is suggested that the social partnership model of governance, to which many people attributed the country's economic success, created an atmosphere of consensualism within which the state as mediator between the two main protagonists (the public health lobby and the drinks industry) was unwilling to challenge the drinks industry. It is also concluded that this failure to create a national alcohol policy based on public health principles demonstrates the limitations of the cross-cutting, or ‘joined-up’, approach to public management in those areas of social policy characterised by clashing value systems or fundamental conflicts of economic interest. Finally, it is acknowledged that in Ireland, as elsewhere, neo-liberal certitudes have been effectively dethroned by the economic recession and banking crisis of late 2008; whether these more straitened economic circumstances will provide a better fit for the ‘nanny state’ ideals of the public health perspective on alcohol remains to be seen.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 343 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcohol Action Ireland (2006), Alcohol in Ireland – Time for Action: A Survey of Irish Attitudes, Dublin: Alcohol Action Ireland.Google Scholar
Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy for England (2004), London: Prime Minister's Strategy Unit.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. (2004), ‘The beverage alcohol industry's social aspects organisations: a public health warning’, Addiction, 99: 11, 1376–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, P. (2007), ‘A safe, sensible and social AHRSE: New Labour and alcohol policy’, Addiction, 102: 10, 1515–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babor, T. (2004), ‘Admirable ends, ineffective means: comments on the alcohol harm reduction strategy for England’, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 11: 5, 361–5.Google Scholar
Babor, T., Caetano, R., Casswell, S., Edwards, G., Giesbrecht, N., Hill, L., Holder, H., Homel, R., Osterberg, E., Rehm, J., Room, R. and Rossow, I. (2003), Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity – Research and Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, J. (2002), ‘Alcohol in Ireland: a lot of damage done, more to do’, Unpublished paper presented to the Alcohol, Ethics and Society Conference, National College of Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, D. (1980), Beyond Alcoholism: Alcohol and Public Health Policy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V. (ed.) (2005), Joined-Up Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, R. (1999), The Management of Cross-Cutting Issues, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Bruun, K., Edwards, G., Lumio, M., Mäkelä, K., Popham, R. E., Room, R., Schmidt, W., Skog, O.-J., Sulkunen, P. and Österberg, E. (1975), Alcohol Control Policies in Public Health Perspective, Helsinki: Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (2002), Alcohol, Drugs and Health Promotion in Modern Ireland, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (2007), ‘Rabbitte revisited: the First Report of the Ministerial Task Force on Measures to Reduce the Demand for Drugs – ten years on’, Administration, 55: 3, 125–44.Google Scholar
Cassells, P. (2003), ‘The future of social partnership in Ireland’, in De Buitleir, D. and Ruane, F. (eds), Governance and Policy in Ireland, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry on Liquor Licensing (2001), Interim Report on Off-Licensing, Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
De Valera, E. (1943), St Patrick's Day Broadcast, 17 March, cited in Lee, J. (1989), Ireland 1912–1985: Politics and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 334.Google Scholar
Delivering Better Government: Strategic Management Initiative (Second Report to Government of the Co-ordinating Group of Secretaries) (1996), Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (Ireland) (1984), The Psychiatric Services: Planning for the Future, Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1996), National Alcohol Policy – Ireland, Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dublin Principles (1997), The Dublin Principles of Cooperation among the Beverage Alcohol Industry, Governments, Scientific Researchers, and the Public Health Community, Dublin: National College of Ireland.Google Scholar
Edwards, G., Anderson, P., Babor, T. F., Casswell, S., Ferrence, R., Giesbrecht, N., Godfrey, C., Holder, H. D., Lemmens, P. H., Mäkelä, K., Midanik, L. T., Norström, T., Österberg, E., Romelsjö, A., Room, R., Simpura, J. and Skog, O. J. (1994), Alcohol Policy and the Public Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission (2007), Charter Establishing the European Alcohol and Health Forum, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Fahey, T., Russell, H. and Whelan, C. (eds) (2007), Best of Times? The Social Impact of the Celtic Tiger, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Ferriter, D. (1999), A Nation of Extremes: The Pioneers in Twentieth-Century Ireland, Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Food and Drink Industry Ireland: Annual Review 2006 (2007), Dublin: Irish Business and Employers Confederation.Google Scholar
Government Alcohol Advisory Group (2008), Report of the Government Alcohol Advisory Group, Dublin: Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform.Google Scholar
Grant, M. and O'Connor, J. (eds) (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility and Alcohol: The Need and Potential for Partnership, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holder, H. D., Kuhlhorn, E., Nordlund, S., Öusterberg, E., Romelsjö, A. and Ugland, T. (1998), European Integration and Nordic Alcohol Policies: Changes in Alcohol Controls and Consequences in Finland, Norway and Sweden, 1980–1997, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hope, A. (2006), ‘The influence of the alcohol industry on alcohol policy in Ireland’, Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 23: 6, 467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, A. (2007), Alcohol Consumption in Ireland 1986–2006, Dublin: Health Service Executive – Alcohol Implementation Group.Google Scholar
Inglis, T. (1998), Moral Monopoly: The Rise and Fall of the Catholic Church in Modern Ireland (2nd edn), Dublin: University College Dublin Press.Google Scholar
Irish Independent (July 30, 2007), ‘Lenihan to tackle drinking culture: off-licence opening may be curbed’.Google Scholar
Irish Times (September 20, 1996), ‘“Dangerous” marketing of alcoholic lemonades’.Google Scholar
Irish Times (August 1, 2007), ‘Lenihan plans alcohol abuse body’.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, D. and Richards, D. (2001), ‘Departmentalism and joined-up government: back to the future?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54: 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelleher, C. (ed.) (1992), The Future for Health Promotion, Galway: Centre for Health Promotion Studies, University College Galway.Google Scholar
Levine, H. (1992), ‘Temperance cultures: concerns about alcohol problems in Nordic and English-speaking countries’, in Lader, M., Edwards, G. and Drummond, D. (eds), The Nature of Alcohol and Drug Related Problems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyder, A. (2005), Pushers Out: The Inside Story of Dublin's Anti-Drugs Movement, Victoria, Canada: Trafford.Google Scholar
Makela, K., Room, R., Single, E., Sulkunen, P. and Walsh, B. et al. (1981), Alcohol, Society and the State: A Comparative Study of Alcohol Control, Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.Google Scholar
McAleese, M. (2003), Speech by the President of Ireland, Mary McAleese at the ‘“Re-Imagining” Ireland Conference’, Charlottesville, Virginia, 7 May 2003.Google Scholar
McCreanor, T., Casswell, S. and Hill, L. (2000), ‘ICAP and the perils of partnership’, Addiction, 95: 2, 179–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mongan, D., Reynolds, S., Fanagan, S. and Long, J. (2007), Health-Related Consequences of Problem Alcohol Use: Overview 6, Dublin: Health Research Board.Google Scholar
Moser, J. (1991), ‘What does a national alcohol policy look like?’, in Glass, I. Belle. (ed.), The International Handbook of Addiction Behaviour, London: Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar
Ó'Cinnéide, S. (1998/1999), ‘Democracy and the Constitution’, Administration, 46: 4, 41–57.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, R. and Thomas, D. (2006), ‘Social partnership and the policy process’, in Healy, S., Reynolds, B. and Collins, M.. (eds), Social Policy in Ireland: Principles, Practice and Problems (revised and updated edition), Dublin: Liffey Press.Google Scholar
Orley, J. (2005), ‘Corporate social responsibility in practice within the beverage alcohol industry’, in Grant, M. and O'Connor, J.. (eds), Corporate Social Responsibility and Alcohol: The Need and Potential for Partnership, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, M. and Hope, A. (2005), ‘The Irish drinking habits of 2002: drinking and drinking-related harms in a European comparative perspective’, Journal of Substance Use, 10: 5, 273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Room, R. (2004), ‘Disabling the public interest: alcohol strategies and policies for England’, Addiction, 99: 9, 1083–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Secker, A. (1993), ‘The policy-research interface: an insider's view’, Addiction, 88 (Supplement): 115S–120S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Single, E., Morgan, P. and de Lindt, J. (eds) (1981), The Social History of Control Policy in Seven Countries, Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Strategic Task Force on Alcohol (2002), Interim Report, Dublin: Department of Health and Children.Google Scholar
Strategic Task Force on Alcohol (2004), Second Report, Dublin: Department of Health and Children.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. (2007), ‘Survival of the ideas that fit: an evolutionary analogy for the use of evidence in policy’, Social Policy and Society, 6: 1, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkunen, P., Sutton, C., Tigerstedt, C. and Warpenius, K. (2000), Broken Spirits: Power and Ideas in Nordic Alcohol Control, Helsinki: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research.Google Scholar
Sustaining Progress: Social Partnership Agreement 2003–2005 (2003), Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Thom, B. (1999), Dealing with Drink: From Treatment to Prevention, London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Whyte, J. (1971), Church and State in Modern Ireland 1923–1970, Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar
Working Together to Reduce the Harms Caused by Alcohol Problems (Sustaining Progress Special Initiative) (2006), http://www.dohc.ie/publications/alcohol_misuse.htmlGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation (1978), Health for All by the Year 2000 (Report of the International Conference on Primary Care, Alma Ata), Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (1986), Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar