Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:18:30.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Family, the Welfare State and Community Care: Political Rhetoric and Public Attitudes*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Patrick West
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within the political arena, most sharply articulated by the new Right, the family and welfare state have been counterposed as ideological opposites with implications for the relative responsibility each should be accorded in respect of a policy of community care. On the basis of evidence from a survey conducted in three locations in Scotland, this paper examines the extent to which the ideological positions of Left and Right are reflected in public attitudes towards these issues. The results show that with the exception of certain groups of ‘ideologues’, individual citizens tend not to structure their attitudes in accordance with overarching ideologies, nor are their attitudes in any consistent way organized along partisan lines. In respect of the family/state polarity, there is only a faint echo of the broad rhetoric of political parties and on more concrete issues like care for dependent persons none at all. The overall picture supports the view that the family and welfare state as they are confronted by people in their everyday lives are much less ideological opposites than intermeshed in an overlapping complex of values, needs and interests.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 417 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alston, J.P. and Dean, I.K. (1972), ‘Socio-economic factors associated with attitudes toward welfare recipients and the causes of poverty’, Social Service Review, 46, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, M. and McIntosh, M. (1982), The Anti-Social Family, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Behrens, R. (1980), The Conservative Party from Heath to Thatcher: Policies and Politics 1974–1979, Saxon House, Farnborough.Google Scholar
Boyson, R. (1978), Centre Forward: A Radical Conservative Programme, Temple Smith, London.Google Scholar
Butler, D. and Stokes, D. (1974), Political Change in Britain, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conservative Party (1983), Election Manifesto, London.Google Scholar
Converse, P. (1964), ‘The nature of belief systems in mass publics’, in Apter, D.E. (ed.). Ideology and Discontent, Free Press, New York, pp.296–361.Google Scholar
Dalley, G. (1983), ‘Ideologies of care: A feminist contribution to the debate’, Critical Social Policy, 8, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyal, L. (1979), The Political Economy of Health, Pluto Press, London.Google Scholar
Edgell, S. and Duke, V. (1983), ‘Gender and social policy: The impact of the public expenditure cuts and reactions to them’, Journal of Social Policy, 12:3, 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, H. (1975), ‘The polls: Government role in welfare’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feagin, J.R. (1972), ‘America's welfare stereotypes’, Social Science Quarterly, 52, 921–33.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Groves, D. (1980), ‘Community care and the family: A case for equal opportunities’, Journal of Social Policy, 9:4, 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, V. and Wilding, P. (1976), Ideology and Social Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Golding, P. (1983), ‘Rethinking common sense about social policy’, in Bull, D. and Wilding, P. (eds), Thatcherism and the Poor. Child Poverty Action Group. London, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Golding, P. and Middleton, S. (1982), Images of Welfare, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. and Whiteley, P. (1977), ‘The political ideology of Labour councillors’, Policy and Politics. 5, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cough, I. (1979). The Political Economy of the Welfare State, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (1983), ‘The crisis of the British welfare state’, International Journal of Health Services, 13:3, 459–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, R. and Seldon, A. (1979), Over-Ruled on Welfare, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London.Google Scholar
Houston, J. and Mockler, C. (1978). ‘Family policy’. Politics Today, Conservative Research Department, 20 02, pp.41–60.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (1978). The Elderly at Home, HMSO. London.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. and Challis, D. (1983). ‘The realities and potential of community care’, in Elderly People in the Community: Their Service Needs, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (1976), Freedom and the Welfare State, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
SirJoseph, K. (1975). Reversing the Trend: A Critical Reappraisal of Conservative Economic and Social Policies. Barry Rose. Chichester.Google Scholar
Judge, K., Smith, J. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983). ‘Public opinion and the privatization of welfare: Some theoretical implications’, Journal of Social Policy, 13:4, 669–89.Google Scholar
Klein, R. (1974), ‘The case for elitism: Public opinion and public policy’, Political Quarterly, 45:3, 496–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. (1984), ‘The politics of ideology vs the reality of politics: The case of Britain's National Health Service in the 1980s’, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society, 62:1, 82–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labour Party (1983), Election Manifesto. London.Google Scholar
Land, H. (1978), ‘Who cares for the family?’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:3, 257–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauer, R.H. (1971), ‘The middle class looks at poverty’, Urban and Social Change Review, 5, 8–10.Google Scholar
Lee, P. (1983), ‘Welfare state: The second front opens’, Marxism Today, 27:5, 22–7.Google Scholar
Lipsey, D. (1979). ‘The reforms people want’, New Society, 50:887, 12–14.Google Scholar
Miller, A.H. (1978), ‘Will public attitudes defeat welfare reform?’ Public Welfare, 36, 48–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Mishra, R. (1977), Society and Social Policy: Theoretical Perspectives on Welfare, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moroney, R.M. (1976), The Family and the State: Considerations for Social Policy, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Mount, F. (1982), The Subversive Family: An Alternative History of Love and Marriage, Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. L. (1973), Introductory Econometrics, Richard D. Irwin Inc., Illinois.Google Scholar
Statesman, New (1979), ‘Victorian values’, Special Supplement, 105, 2723.Google Scholar
Norris, M. (1979), ‘Those we like to help’, New Society, 45:822, 18.Google Scholar
OPCS (1980), Classification of Occupations, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Rees, T. (1983), ‘Health and welfare: Running to stand still’, in Bull, D. and Wilding, P. (eds), Thatcherism and the Poor, Child Poverty Action Group, London, pp.59–65.Google Scholar
Schlackman, (1978), Report on Research on Public Attitudes towards the Supplementary Benefits System, Schlackman Research Organisation. London.Google Scholar
Shanas, E., Townsend, P., Wedderburn, D., Friis, N., Milhoj, P. and Stehowsdr, J. (1968). Old People in Three Industrial Societies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.C. (1983), ‘The black and white model of attitude stability: A latent class examination of opinion and non-opinion in the American public’, American Journal of Sociology, 89:2, 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1981). ‘The new right and social policy’, Critical Social Policy, 1:1, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1982), ‘Two cheers for the welfare state: Public opinion and private welfare’, Journal of Public Policy. 2:4, 319–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983a), ‘The welfare state and individual freedom: Attitudes to welfare spending and to the power of the state’. Political Studies, 31, 640–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983b), ‘Moralism, self-interest and attitudes to welfare’, Policy and Politics, 11:2, 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983c), ‘Legitimation deficit, public opinion and the welfare state’, Sociology, 17:2, 165–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, M. (1977), ‘The healthy society’, in Let Our Children Grow Tall: Selected Speeches 1975–1977, Centre for Policy Studies, London.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. and West, P. (1984). ‘The public appeal of sheltered housing’, Ageing and Society, 4:3 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, S. and Studlar, D.T. (1983). ‘The policy opinions of British political activists’, Political Studies, 31, 604–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, P. (1984), ‘Welfare’. Public Money. 4:1, 12–13.Google Scholar
West, P., Dalley, G., Thompson, C., Brown, S., Hewitt, A., Illsley, R. and Kelman, H. (1983), ‘Social responsibility for the care of dependency groups’, International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 6:4, 506–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, P., Illsley, R. and Kelman, H. (1984), ‘Public preferences for the care of dependency groups’. Social Science and Medicine, 18:4, 287–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteley, P. (1981a), ‘Public opinion and the demand for social welfare in Britain’, Journal of Social Policy, 10:4, 453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, P. (1981b), ‘Who are the Labour activists?’, Political Quarterly, 52, 160–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, P. (1983), The Labour Party in Crisis, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. (1982), ‘Women, the “community” and the “family”’, in Walker, A. (ed.), Community Care: The Family, the State and Social Policy, Basil Blackwell and Martin Robertson, Oxford, pp.40–55.Google Scholar