Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:13:37.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the Contribution of Frontline Welfare Service Delivery to Capability Development in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2014

CLAIRE MASON ,
ANNELIESE SPINKS ,
STEFAN HAJKOWICZ  and
LIZ HOBMAN
CLAIRE MASON
Affiliation:
Science into Society Group, CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering, Australia email: [email protected]
ANNELIESE SPINKS
Affiliation:
Social and Economic Sciences Program, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Australia email: [email protected]
STEFAN HAJKOWICZ
Affiliation:
CSIRO Futures, Australia email: [email protected]
LIZ HOBMAN
Affiliation:
Social and Economic Sciences Program, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Australia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores how interactions between frontline welfare service delivery employees and recipients are seen to affect welfare recipients’ capabilities. Seventeen employees and fifty-two welfare recipients from the Australian Department of Human Services were interviewed regarding their service delivery experiences. Interviews were transcribed and participants’ descriptions of the outcomes achieved from welfare service delivery interactions were analysed to determine the major themes. Burchardt and Vizard's (2007) capability list captured many of the effects described by participants, particularly the capability domains labelled ‘Individual, family and social life’, ‘Education and learning’, ‘Standard of living’, ‘Health’ and ‘Productive and valued activities’. Other outcomes were described by participants that might represent early indicators of positive or negative impact. Our findings suggest that welfare service delivery can both promote and impair capability development for welfare recipients.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 635 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerly, B. (2000), Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alkire, S., Bastagli, F., Burchardt, T., Clark, D., Holder, H., Ibrahim, S.et al. (2009), Developing the Equality Measurement Framework: Selecting the indicators, Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2009), A Stronger, Fairer Australia, Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Baker, D., Panzironi, F. and Sparrow, S. (2012), ‘Aboriginal peoples’ participation in the review of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988 in South Australia’, in Panzironi, F. and Gelber, K. (eds.), The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. and Vizard, P. (2007), Definition of Equality and Framework for Measurement: Final Recommendations of the Equalities Review Steering Group on Measurement, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.Google Scholar
Citizens First 3 (2003), Erin Research Inc. for Citizen Centred Service Network, Canada, Toronto: Canadian Centre for Management Development.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. (2002), Visions of Development: A Study of Human Values, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. and Gough, I. (2005), ‘Capabilities, needs and well-being: relating the universal and the local’, in Manderson, L. (ed.), Rethinking Wellbeing, Perth, AU: API Network, pp. 45–68.Google Scholar
Galster, D., Rosenstein, E. and Bonvin, J.-M. (2009), ‘Assessing integrated employment policies against the capability approach: a Swiss case study’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29: 637–648.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, S. and Whiteside, N. (2009), ‘The promotion of capabilities in Sweden: a case study of the contraction of shipbuilding in Gothenburg’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29: 587–598.Google Scholar
Green, A. E. and Orton, M. (2009), ‘The integration of activation policy at sub-national level: a case study of the city strategy initiative in an English sub-region’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29: 612–623.Google Scholar
Hayes, A., Gray, M. and Edwards, B. (2008), Social Inclusion: Origins, Concepts and Key Themes, Canberra: Social Inclusion Unit.Google Scholar
Heintzman, R. and Marson, B. (2005), ‘People, service and trust: is there a public sector service value chain?’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71: 549–575.Google Scholar
Ipsos MORI (2007), Consulting for a Capability List: Research Study Conducted by Ipsos MORI for the Equalities Review, Wetherby, West Yorkshire: Equalities Review.Google Scholar
Kampen, J. K., Van de Walle, S. and Bouckaert, G. (2003), ‘On the relative role of the public administration, the public services and the political institutions in building trust in government in Flanders’, paper presented at the ASPA's 64th National Conference, The Power of Public Service.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980), Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Found.Google Scholar
Meyers, M. K., Glaser, B. and Donald, K. M. (1998), ‘On the front lines of welfare delivery: are workers implementing policy reforms?’, Journal of Public Analysis and Management, 17: 1–22.Google Scholar
Monro, D. (2003), ‘The role of performance measures in a federal-state context: the examples of housing and disability services’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62: 70–79.Google Scholar
Monteleone, R. and Mozzana, C. (2009), ‘Integrated employment policies for disabled people: organisational innovation between obstacles and opportunities’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29: 649–661.Google Scholar
Morris, A. (2012), ‘Living on the margins: the capabilities of older renters in Sydney, Australia’, in Panzironi, F. and Gelber, K. (eds.), The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., Rademacher, A. and Koch, S. (2000), Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? New York: Published for the World Bank, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000), Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. (2003), ‘Poverty, well-being, and gender: what counts, who's heard?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31: 280–316.Google Scholar
Panzioroni, F. (2012), ‘The “Indigenous capability – right to health” and Australia's “Close the Gap” Indigenous health policy’, in Panzironi, F. and Gelber, K. (eds.), The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, London: Routledge, pp. 68–83.Google Scholar
Riccucci, N. M., Meyers, M. K., Lurie, I. and Han, J. S. (2004), ‘The implementation of welfare reform policy: the role of public managers in front-line practices’, Public Administration Review, 64: 4, 438–448.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1984), Resources, Values and Development, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2001), Development as Freedom, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2002), Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Social Justice and Social Change Research Centre (2009), Centrelink Place Based Services Program Evaluation, Sydney: University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program (1990), Human Development Report 1990, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiklund, S. (2007), ‘United we stand? Collaboration as a means for identifying children and adolescents at risk’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 16: 202–211.Google Scholar
Winkworth, G. (2005), ‘Partnering the 800 pound gorilla: Centrelink working locally to create opportunities for participation’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64: 3, 24–34.Google Scholar
Yur’yev, A., Varnik, A., Varnik, P., Sisask, M., and Leppik, L. (2012), ‘Role of social welfare in European suicide prevention’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 21: 26–33.Google Scholar