Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T05:51:10.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Strain and Public Support for Redistribution: A Comparative Analysis of 28 European Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2012

MORTEN BLEKESAUNE
MORTEN BLEKESAUNE*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Work, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Is public support for redistribution affected by the number of people experiencing economic strain in a country? This question is investigated by comparing twenty-eight countries in the fourth round of the European Social Survey 2008–09 using two-level linear regression models. The results show that individuals reporting economic strain support redistribution more strongly than those who do not experience economic strain. Further, individuals living in countries where many other people report economic strain also support redistribution more strongly than individuals living in countries with less economic strain. The latter correlation is not explained by objective measures of the economic situation such as household income or the income dispersal of the country. The country-level effect of economic strain holds for all income levels. It is largely driven by a tendency to strongly believe in redistribution when living in countries of widespread economic strain. The results indicate that governments would receive more rather than less public support for redistributive policies during periods of economic strain.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 57 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelbaum, L. D. (2001), ‘The influence of perceived deservingness on policy decisions regarding aid to the poor’, Political Psychology, 22: 3, 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoud, R., Blekesaune, M. and Hancock, R. (2009), ‘Ageing, income and living standards: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey’, Ageing and Society, 29: 7, 1105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoud, R. and Bryan, M. (2011), ‘Income, deprivation and poverty: a longitudinal analysis’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 1, 135–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blekesaune, M. (2007), ‘Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies’, European Sociological Review, 23: 3, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003), ‘Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations’, European Sociological Review, 19: 5, 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, E. H. (1953), The Bolshevik Revolution, 1917–1923: Volume III, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cutright, P. (1965), ‘Political structure, economic development, and national social security programs’, American Journal of Sociology, 70: 5, 537–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dallinger, U. (2010), ‘Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 20: 4, 333–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlund, J. (1999), ‘Trust in government and welfare regimes: attitudes to redistribution and financial cheating in the USA and Norway’, European Journal of Political Research, 35: 3, 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1989), Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
European Social Survey (2011), ESS4 – 2008 Documentation Report, Bergen: The ESS Data Archive, http://ess.nsd.uib.no/ess.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. and Zaller, J. (1992), ‘The political culture of ambivalence: ideological responses to the welfare state’, American Journal of Political Science, 36: 1, 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2009), ‘Income inequality and demand for redistribution: a multilevel analysis of European public opinion’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 32: 1, 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, C. (2001), ‘Social preferences, self-interest, and demand for redistribution’, Journal of Public Economics, 82: 2, 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenfeld, Y. and Rafferty, J. A. (1989), ‘The determinants of public attitudes toward the welfare state’, Social Forces, 67: 4, 1027–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, T. G. (2010), ‘Public versus private: the conditional effect of state policy and institutional trust on mass opinion’, European Sociological Review, 26: 3, 307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M. M. (2006), ‘Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: the regime hypothesis revisited’, European Sociological Review, 22: 2, 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jæger, M. M. (2009), ‘United but divided: welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution’, European Sociological Review, 25: 6, 723–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, L. and McCall, L. (2008), ‘Inequality, public opinion, and redistribution’, Socio-Economic Review, 6: 1, 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. (2007), ‘Social risk and social insurance: political demand for unemployment insurance’, Rationality and Society, 19: 2, 229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C. A. (2008), ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41: 2, 145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggett, J. C. (1964), ‘Economic insecurity and working-class consciousness’, American Sociological Review, 29: 2, 226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, N. and Pontusson, J. (2011), ‘The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution’, American Political Science Review, 105: 2, 316–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lübcker, M. (2007), ‘Inequality and the demand for redistribution: are the assumptions of the new growth theory valid?’, Socio-Economic Review, 5: 1, 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1964), Class, Citizenship and Social Development, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. F. (1981), ‘A rational theory of the size of government’, Journal of Political Economy, 89: 5, 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchel, G., Tetlock, P. E. and Lerner, J. S. (2003), ‘Experiments behind the veil: structural influences of social justice’, Political Psychology, 24: 3, 519–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, H. W. (1967), ‘Response style influence in public opinion surveys’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 31: 1, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review, 94: 2, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1972), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ringen, S. (1988), ‘Direct and indirect measures of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 17: 3, 351–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R. and Allen, H. M. Jr. (1980), ‘Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting’, American Political Science Review, 74: 3, 670–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1992), Inequality Reexamined, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (1995), ‘Measurement issues in cross-national research’, Journal of International Business Studies, 26: 3, 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (1997), ‘Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight western nations’, European Sociological Review, 13: 3, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1985), Public Opinion, Ideology and State Welfare, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Whelan, C. T., Layte, R., Maitre, B. and Nolan, B. (2001), ‘Income, deprivation, and economic strain: an analysis of the European community household panel’, European Sociological Review, 17: 4, 357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (1975), The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, M. (1966), ‘Economic insecurity and political attitudes of Cuban workers’, American Sociological Review, 31: 1, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar