Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:55:21.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decentring Social Policy? Devolution and the Discipline of Social Policy: A Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

CHARLOTTE WILLIAMS  and
GERRY MOONEY
CHARLOTTE WILLIAMS
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Justice, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire
GERRY MOONEY
Affiliation:
[contact author] Senior Lecturer in Social Policy and Staff Tutor in the Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University in Scotland, 10 Drumsheugh Gardens, Edinburgh, Scotland EH3 7QJ email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Constitutional change offers the opportunity for a major departure in the nature and direction of policy, practices and governance in social policy. This article explores some of the impacts devolution has for the discipline of social policy, suggesting that devolution matters for social policy as a field of research and study, and for the analysis and understanding of developments in UK social policy. It argues that devolution has a number of implications in terms of comparative and transnational social policy, new sites of analysis, the language of social policy, the production of knowledge and the development of new policy communities within the UK. It also signals new perspectives based on evolving welfare subjectivities and around questions of territorial justice. Drawing on discussions about the nature of social policy in the 1970s in particular, suggestions are made as to how new and emerging perspectives within and across the nations of the UK serve to ‘decentre’ the social policy tradition. In essence, this article seeks to open up a debate for ‘theorising’ the discipline of social policy through a focus on devolution.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 489 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. and Robinson, P. (eds) (2002), Devolution in Practice, London: Institute of Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Adams, J. and Schmeuker, K. (eds) (2005), Devolution in Practice 2006, Newcastle: Institute of Public Policy Research North.Google Scholar
Alcock, P. (1998), ‘The discipline of social policy’, in Alcock, P., Erskine, A. and May, M. (eds), The Student's Companion to Social Policy, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Alcock, P., Erskine, A. and May, M. (eds) (1998), The Student's Companion to Social Policy, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Alcock, P. and Craig, G. (eds) (2001), International Social Policy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. (2002), ‘Devolution in England: Coping with post-industrial regions – issues of territorial inequality’, in Sykes, R., Bochel, C. and Ellison, N. (eds), Social Policy Review, 14, Bristol: Policy Press/Social Policy Association.Google Scholar
Cahill, M. (1994), The New Social Policy, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chaney, P. and Drakeford, M. (2004), ‘The primacy of ideology: social policy and the first term of the National Assembly for Wales’, Social Policy Review 16, Bristol: Policy Press/Social Policy Association, pp. 121–42.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (2004), Changing Welfare, Changing States: New Directions in Social Policy, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (2005), ‘Welfare states as nation states: some conceptual reflections’, Social Policy and Society, 4: 4, 407–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, A., Clarke, J. and Gewirtz, S. (eds) (2001), Comparing Welfare States, second edition, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Critical Social Policy (2006), Special Issue on Devolution and Social Policy, 26: 3.Google Scholar
Davies, S. (2003), Inside the Laboratory: The New Politics of Public Services in Wales, London: Catalyst.Google Scholar
Day, G. (2002), Making Sense of Wales, Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Ditch, J. (1988), Social Policy in Northern Ireland between 1939 and 1950, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Drakeford, M. (2007), ‘Progressive Universalism’, Agenda, Winter, pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
English, J. (1988), Social Services in Scotland, third edition, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Anderson, G. (1996), Welfare States in Transition, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2001), Welfare Theory, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. (2007), ‘Funding “will be the next step in UK devolution”’, The Herald, 8 December.Google Scholar
Greer, S. (2003), ‘Health policy’, in Osmond, J. (ed.), Second Term Challenge: Can the Welsh Assembly Government Hold its Course? Cardiff: Institute of Welsh Affairs.Google Scholar
Greer, S. (2005) Territorial Politics and Health Policy: UK Health Policy in Comparative Perspective, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, S. (2006), Territory, Democracy and Justice, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L. (2004), ‘Manufactured civil society’, Critical Social Policy, 24: 2, 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, G. (2006), ‘Devolution, direct rule and neo-liberal reconstruction in Northern Ireland’, Critical Social Policy, 26: 3, 656–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. and Lowe, S. (2004), Understanding the Policy Process: Analysing Welfare Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, C. (2002), ‘Uniformity and diversity in policy provision: insights from the US, Germany and Canada’, in Adams, J. and Robinson, P.. (eds), Devolution in Practice, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, C. (2005), Devolution: What Difference Has It Made? Swindon: ESRC Research, Programme on Constitutional Change (www.dev.ac.uk, accessed 1 October 2006).Google Scholar
Keating, M. (2002), ‘Devolution and public policy in the United Kingdom: convergence or divergence?’, in Adams, J. and Robinson, P. (eds), Devolution in Practice, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. (2000), ‘Expanding the social policy imaginary’, in Lewis, G., Gewirtz, S. and Clarke, J. (eds), Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lohde, L. (2005), ‘Child poverty and devolution’, in Adams, J. and Schmeuker, K. (eds), Devolution in Practice 2006, Newcastle: Institute of Public Policy Research North.Google Scholar
Lowe, S. (2004), ‘Bringing the political science back in’, Policy World, Autumn, p. 13.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. (1998), ‘Think globally, lose locally’, Boston Review, 32: 4–10.Google Scholar
MacDonell, H. (2007), ‘Now Salmond issues challenge to London's grip on foreign policy’, The Scotsman, 19 June.Google Scholar
McCrone, D. (2001), Understanding Scotland: The Sociology of a Nation, second edition, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McEwen, N. (2006), Nationalism and the State: Welfare and Identity in Scotland and Quebec, Bruxelles: PIE/Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McEwen, N. and Moreno, L. (eds) (2005), The Territorial Politics of Welfare, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. (1977), Society and Social Policy: Theories and Practice of Welfare, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mooney, G. (2006), ‘Social justice in the devolved Scotland: representation or reality?’, ESRC Social Justice and Public Policy Seminar Series, Glasgow University Centre for Social Justice, 28 March.Google Scholar
Mooney, G. and Scott, G. (eds) (2005), Exploring Social Policy in the ‘New’ Scotland, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Mooney, G. and Williams, C. (2006) ‘Forging new “ways of life”? Social policy and nation building in a devolved Scotland and Wales’, Critical Social Policy, 26: 3, 608–29.Google Scholar
Mooney, G., Scott, G. and Williams, C. (2006), ‘Rethinking social policy through devolution’, Critical Social Policy, 26: 3, 483–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. (2002), Speech to the University of Wales, Swansea National Centre for Public Policy Third Anniversary Lecture, 11 December.Google Scholar
Newman, J. (2001), Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. and Castles, F. G. (2005), ‘Introduction: federalism and the welfare state’, in Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. and Castles, F. G. (eds), Federalism and the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offer, J. (2006), An Intellectual History of British Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Paterson, L., Brown, A., Curtice, J., Hinds, K., McCrone, D., Park, A., Sproston, K. and Surridge, P. (2001), New Scotland, New Politics?, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press/Polygon.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005), ‘Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 1, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, C. (1994), Dismantling the Welfare State?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, R. (1979), Social Theory and Social Policy, London: Heineman.Google Scholar
Rees, G. and Rees, T. (1980), Poverty and Social Inequality in Wales, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1994), ‘The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public service in. Britain’, Political Quarterly Review, 65: 137–51.Google Scholar
Rodríquez-Rose, A. and Gill, N. (2003), ‘The global trend towards devolution and its implications’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21: 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinfield, A. (2004), ‘Upstream thinking’, Policy World, Autumn, p. 10.Google Scholar
Social Policy Association (SPA) (2004), ‘Where next for social policy?’, Policy World, Autumn.Google Scholar
Spicker, P. (1995), Social Policy: Themes and Approaches, Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Spicker, P. (2004), ‘Where next for social policy?’, Policy World, Autumn, pp. 8–9Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (2004), Taking Stock: Scottish Social Welfare after Devolution, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Swank, D. (2002), Global Capital, Political Institutions and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1974), Social Policy, London: George Allen &Unwin.Google Scholar
Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) (2007) Fulfilled Lives, Supportive Communities: A Strategy for Social Services in Wales over the Next Decade, WAG February 2007.Google Scholar
Williams, C. and De Lima, P. (2006), ‘Devolution, multicultural citizenship and race equality: from laissez faire to nationally responsible policies’, Critical Social Policy, 26: 3, 498–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (1989), Social Policy: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (2000), ‘A conceptual chart for CAVA,’ ESRC research group on Care, Values and the Future of Welfare, Workshop paper no. 16, Methodologies for Researching Moral Agency. Workshop 4, 17 March, University of Leeds. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cava/papers/paper16fiona.htm (accessed 12 June 2007).Google Scholar
Williamson, A. and Room, G. (eds) (1983), Health and Welfare States of Britain: An Inter-country Comparison, London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Wincott, D. (2005), ‘Devolution, social democracy and policy diversity in Britain: the case of early childhood education and care’, in Adams, J. and Schmeuker, K.. (eds), Devolution in Practice 2006, Newcastle: Institute of Public Policy Research North.Google Scholar
Wincott, D. (2006), ‘Social policy and social citizenship: Britain's welfare states’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 36: 1, 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. (2001), Globalisation and Social Policy, London: Sage.Google Scholar