Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:29:32.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘When you put the Group and the Running Together. . .’: A Qualitative Examination of Participant Experiences of the Canadian Run to Quit program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2018

K. Glowacki ,
M. O'Neill ,
C.S. Priebe  and
G. Faulkner
K. Glowacki*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
M. O'Neill
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
C.S. Priebe
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
G. Faulkner
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
Address for Correspondence: Krista Glowacki, D.H. Copp Building- 2146 Health Sciences Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Britsh Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction: Run to Quit is a national community-based program that combines smoking cessation support with physical activity through learn to run group-based curriculum, self-help and smoking cessation materials. The program is currently in a three-year scaling up phase.

Aims: The aim of the current study is to explore participant experiences of the Run to Quit program after its first year, and identify potential areas of improvement for future iterations of the program.

Methods: Participants (n = 55) were interviewed over the phone at the end of the 10-week program. Participant interviews were recorded and transcribed. A thematic analysis was conducted.

Results/Findings: Participants were satisfied with the program. Strengths of the program were the group aspect, supervised participation and the running. Weaknesses were seen as the variability in walking and running abilities and inadequate engagement by the Smokers Helpline. Many people who successfully quit smoking reported using additional quit aids. Non-completers of the program gave mostly logistical and personal reasons for dropout.

Conclusions: Overall, Run to Quit was well received by participants. Multiple health behaviour interventions at a scalable level appear feasible. Based on participant feedback, key recommendations to improve the program in the future include greater tailoring to walking or running preference, and increasing engagement with the Smokers Helpline.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Smoking Cessation , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 52 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, F. E., Stronks, K., Willemsen, M. C., Bogaerts, N. M. M., & Nierkens, V. (2014). Wanting to attend isn't just wanting to quit: Why some disadvantaged smokers regularly attend smoking cessation behavioural therapy while others do not: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 14 (695), 1–12.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.Google Scholar
Canadian Cancer Society. (2013). For smokers who want to quit- One step at a time. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Quitting smoking among adults- United States 2001–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60, 1513–1519.Google Scholar
Chaiton, M., Diemert, L., Cohen, J.E., Bondy, S.J., Selby, P., Philpneri, A. et al. (2016). Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers. BMJ Open, 6, e011045.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2249–2258.Google Scholar
Cruse, S. M., Forster, N. J. D., Thurgood, G., & Sys, L. (2001). Smoking cessation in the workplace: Results of an intervention programme using nicotine patches. Occupational Medicine, 8 (51), 501–506.Google Scholar
deRuiter, W., & Faulkner, G. (2006). Tobacco harm reduction strategies: The case for physical activity. Nicotine & Tobacco Research : Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 8 (2), 157–6.Google Scholar
Ding, D., Lawson, K. D., Kolbe-Alexander, T. L., Finkelstein, E. A., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Van Mechelen, W., . . . & Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee. (2016). The economic burden of physical inactivity: A global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. The Lancet, 388 (10051), 1311–1324.Google Scholar
Ford, P., Clifford, A., Gussy, K., & Gartner, C. (2013). A systematic review of peer-support programs for smoking cessation in disadvantaged groups. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 5507–5522.Google Scholar
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Haasova, M., Warren, F. C., Ussher, M., Janse Van Rensburg, K., Faulkner, G., Cropley, M. et al. (2014). The acute effects of physical activity on cigarette cravings: Exploration of potential moderators, mediators and physical activity attributes using individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses. Psychopharmacology, 231 (7), 1267–75.Google Scholar
Hollands, G. J., McDermott, M. S., Longson-Hawley, N., Vogt, F., Farley, A., & Aveyard, P. (2015). Interventions to increase adherence to medications for tobacco dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD009164.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage.Google Scholar
Mammen, G., & Faulkner, G. (2013). Physical activity and the prevention of depression: A systematic review of prospective studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45, 649–657.Google Scholar
Michie, S., Ashford, S., Sniehotta, F. F., Dombrowski, S. U., Bishop, A., & French, D. P. (2011). A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychology & Health, 2, 1479–1498.Google Scholar
Moore, D., Aveyard, P., Connock, M., Wang, D., Fry-Smith, A., & Barton, P. (2009). Effectiveness and safety of nicotine replacement therapy assisted reduction to stop smoking: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 338, b1024.Google Scholar
Morphett, K., Partridge, B., Gartner, C., Carter, A., & Hall, W. (2015). Why don't smokers want help to quit? A qualitative study of smokers' attitudes towards assisted vs. unassisted quitting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12 (6), 6591–6607.Google Scholar
Prapavessis, H., De Jesus, S., Fitzgeorge, L., Faulkner, G., Maddison, R., & Batten, S. (2016). Exercise to enhance smoking cessation: The getting physical on cigarette randomized control trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 1–12.Google Scholar
Priebe, C. S., Atikinson, J., & Faulkner, G. (2016). Run to quit: Program design and evaluation protocol. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 11, 38–45.Google Scholar
Priebe, C. S., Atkinson, J., & Faulkner, G. (2017). Run to quit: An evaluation of a scalable physical activity-based smoking cessation intervention. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 13, 15–21.Google Scholar
Roberts, V., Maddison, R., Simpson, C., Bullen, C., & Prapavessis, H. (2012). The acute effects of exercise on cigarette cravings, withdrawal symptoms, affect, and smoking behaviour: systematic review update and meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology, 222 (1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Stead, L. F., Koilpillai, P., Fanshawe, T. R., & Lancaster, T. (2016). Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD008286.Google Scholar
Stead, L. F., & Lancaster, T. (2005). Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2.Google Scholar
Ussher, M. H., Taylor, A. H., & Faulkner, G. (2014). Exercise interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8.Google Scholar