Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:34:21.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motivation, Cognitive, and Affective Factors that Predict Smoking Relapse: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Filipino Sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Aylin M. Bello ,
Jennifer N. Robles ,
Arsthel F. Sarmiento ,
Antover P. Tuliao  and
Rachel C. Reyes
Aylin M. Bello
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Miriam College, Philippines.
Jennifer N. Robles
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Miriam College, Philippines.
Arsthel F. Sarmiento
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Miriam College, Philippines.
Antover P. Tuliao*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Ateneo De Manila University, Philippines.
Rachel C. Reyes
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Miriam College, Philippines. [email protected]
*
*Address for correspondence: Antover P. Tuliao, Psychology Department, Ateneo De Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the plethora of international research on smoking relapse there are findings that suggest distinct ethnocultural differences in relapse predictors. This study aimed to uncover cognitive and affective factors that contribute to relapse in a sample of Filipino adult smokers (N = 115). Using discriminant function analysis, results suggest that self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, craving and the subdomains of motivation to change contemplation and action are accurate relapse predictors, whereas negative emotional states are not. An integrative framework was used in the discussion to account for inconsistencies in the results. Implications for understanding the relapse cycle, the connection between smoking relapse and substance use, as well as suggestions for future studies on smoking relapse, are also discussed.

Keywords

Filipinosmokingrelapse predictorsaddiction
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Smoking Cessation , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , 01 June 2011 , pp. 17 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)