Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
The publication 1 of the fragment at first missing from the upper left-hand corner of the tabula Hebana (AE 1949, 215) so far confirms some conjectures which I made in a talk at Cambridge in 1951 that I am moved to print the briefest note about a point which does not seem so far to have been mentioned elsewhere.
1 Coli, U., ‘Due nuovi frammenti della Tabula Hebana’ in La Parola del Passato 21, 1951, 433–8Google Scholar.
2 ‘Sulla biblioteca del tempio di Apollo Palatino’ Rendiconti dei Lincei 1949, 380–2.
3 Jordan, H. (ed.), Forma Urbis Romae regionum xiiii (Berlin, 1874), Taf. XX, Frag. 163Google Scholar.
4 Iani Dousae filii In Catullum, Tibullum, Propertium coniectanea & notae (Lugd. Batavorum, 1592), III. In Catullus, Tibullus, Propertius… nunc denuo recogniti ac variis Lectionibus & Notis illustrati a Iano Dousa filio (Lugduni Bat. 1592) the lines are printed (p. 194) in the order of the MSS.
5 The new fragments of the tabula Hebana are now published in AE 1952, 164.