Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:57:15.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rôle of Basilides in the events of A.D. 69

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Kenneth Scott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the establishing of Vespasian on the imperial throne an important part was played by Ti. Iulius Alexander, the prefect of Egypt. Before any decisive step was taken by Vespasian, the Egyptian prefect had deliberated with either Mucianus or Vespasian, or with both, and had pledged his support. The prefect was, moreover, the first to have his soldiers take the oath of allegiance to Vespasian, on July 1st, 69. The die was cast by Vespasian at the conclusion of a conference held with Mucianus at Mt. Carmel, and it is only reasonable to suppose that Ti. Iulius Alexander had a representative at this all-important meeting. I suggest that there was such a representative, a certain Basilides, concerning whom we have considerable information.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , 1934 , pp. 138 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Name of Author 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tac. Hist. 11, 74Google Scholar : ‘Muciani animus nec Vespasiano alienus et in Titum pronior; praefectus Aegypti Ti. Alexander consilia sociaverat.’ Cf. Dessau, , PIR ii, p. 165Google Scholar : ‘Cum eo Mucianus consilium transferendi in Vespasianum imperii communicat.’ According to Tacitus (Hist. ii, 76Google Scholar) Mucianus points out to Vespasian the fact that he has the support of the troops in Egypt.

2 Suet. Vesp. 6, and Tac. Hist. ii, 79Google Scholar.

3 Cf. Weynand, ‘Flavius (206)’ in P-W, 12 Halbbd., col. 2634 : ‘Als nun Vitellius die Oberhand gewonnen hatte, drängte Mucian bei einer Zusammenkunft am Berge Karmel den unentschlossenen Vespasian, von den hoheren Offizieren und den Freunden des Vespasian unterstützt, zum, festen Entschlusse (ego te, Vespasiane, ad imperitum voco Tac. Hist. ii, 76Google Scholar. Josephus, Bell. iv, 605Google Scholar).’

4 Ditt. Or. Gr., 665.

5 Cf. v. Rohden, P-W, s.v. ‘Basileides.’

6 PIR2 i (1933). 355Google Scholar, no. 61.

7 Basilides, meaning ‘Fitzroy,’ is evidently taken to portend imperial sway.

8 Hist. iv, 82.

9 Cf. Weber, W., Josepbus und Vespasian (1921), pp. 250–258Google Scholar, on the dating of the miracula.

10 According to Tacitus there was at Carmel neither image nor temple but only an altar and worship of the god. Before attempting a struggle for the throne it was natural enough that Vespasian should consult the god with sacrifice, and it would not be surprising if a priest from the Roman army assisted and consulted the exta. There is no indication that Basilides was a priest of the god of Carmel. In Suet. Vesp. 5, the lots are said to have been favourable, but no mention is made of Basilides.

11 Op. cit., p. 355, nos. 60 and 61.