Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:32:33.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Play on the Proper Names of Individuals in the Catullan Corpus: Wordplay, the Iambic Tradition, and the Late Republican Culture of Public Abuse*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Jennifer Ingleheart
Jennifer Ingleheart*
Affiliation:
Durham University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper explores the significance of names and naming in Catullus. Catullus’ use of proper names, and in particular his play on the connotations of the names of individuals who are attacked within his poems, has not been fully explored to date, and the paper identifies several examples of such play which have not previously been recognized. The paper examines Catullan wordplay in the context of both the iambic tradition and the public abuse culture of the late Roman Republic.

Keywords

Catullusetymologywordplaycognominaiambic poetryRepublican oratory
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 104 , November 2014 , pp. 51 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Earlier versions of this paper were delivered at the Work in Progress Seminars at the Universities of Edinburgh and Durham in 2010–11, and at the Annual Classical Association Conference in Durham in 2011; I am grateful to audience members for their helpful suggestions. My biggest debt of thanks is owed to Stephen Heyworth for his careful reading of earlier drafts of this paper, and to the anonymous JRS readers, whose comments have helped me towards a final version.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, J. N. 1982: The Latin Sexual Vocabulary, LondonGoogle Scholar
Ahl, F. 1985: Metaformations, IthacaGoogle Scholar
Akbar Khan, H. 1968: ‘Catullus 45: what sort of irony?’ Latomus 27, 3–12Google Scholar
Arkins, B. 1982: Sexuality in Catullus, Hildesheim/Zürich/New YorkGoogle Scholar
Baker, S. 1958: ‘The irony of Catullus’ Septimius and Acme’, Classical Philology 53, 110–12Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1994: Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso Augusteo, Rome/Bari=1997: The Poet and the Prince, Berkeley/Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. A. 2004: ‘Philomela’, Translation and Literature 13.2, 194–206Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1961: ‘Catull an Cato von Utica (c. 56)’, Hermes 89, 345–56Google Scholar
Buecheler, F., Riese, A., and Lommatzsch, E. (eds) 1964: Anthologia Latina vol. 2.2, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1996: ‘Ancient “etymology” and Tibullus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42, 24–6Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1976: ‘Catullus 29’, Hermes 104, 155–63Google Scholar
Carey, C. 1986: ‘Archilochus and Lycambes’, Classical Quarterly 36, 60–7Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. 1996: Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. 2013: ‘Boring Ipsitilla: bilingual wordplay in Catullus 32’, Museum Helveticum 70, 190–8Google Scholar
Curran, L. C. 1966: ‘Gellius and the lover's pallor: a note on Catullus 80’, Arion 6, 24–7Google Scholar
Dettmer, H. 1985: ‘A note on Catullus 47’, Classical World 78.6, 577–9Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1889: A Commentary on Catullus (2nd edn), OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. 1991: ‘Stuprum: public attitudes and penalties for sexual offences in Republican Rome’, Échos du monde classique 10, 267–91Google Scholar
Ferrero, L. 1955: Interpretazione di Catullo, TurinGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1988: ‘Power and impotence in Horace's Epodes’, Ramus 17, 176–91Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1995: Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position, Berkeley/Los Angeles/LondonGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, M. 2008: ‘The Lesbia code: backmasking, pillow talk, and cacemphaton in Catullus 5 and 16’, Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica 89, 55–69Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. 1961: Catullus. A Commentary, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1957: Horace, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1961: ‘Two poems of Catullus’, Journal of Roman Studies 51, 46–53Google Scholar
Frueh, E. 1990: ‘Sinistra ut ante dextra: reading Catullus 45’, Classical World 84.1, 15–21Google Scholar
Grandgent, C. H. 1962: An Introduction to Vulgar Latin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1991: ‘Catullus XXXII’, Classical Quarterly 41.2, 547–51Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. 1993: ‘Plautine ingredients in the performance of the “Pseudolus”’, Classical World 87.1, 21–6Google Scholar
Harrison, E. 1915: ‘Catullus LXXXIV’, Classical Review 29.7, 198–9Google Scholar
Havet, L. 1911: Manuel de critique verbale appliquée aux textes latins, ParisGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. 1999a: ‘Who's counting – Catullus by numbers’, in Henderson 1999b, 69–92 (= ‘Who's counting – Catullus by numbers’, in Jocelyn, H. D. and Pinsent, H. H. (eds), Tria Lustra. Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent, Liverpool Classical Papers 3, Liverpool (1993), 243–54)Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1999b: Writing Down Rome, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. 2002: ‘Catullian iambics, Catullian “iambi”’, in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A. and Barchiesi, A. (eds), Iambic Ideas: Essays on a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire, Lanham, MD, 117–40Google Scholar
Hexter, R. forthcoming: ‘The kisses of Juventius and policing the boundaries of masculinity: the case of Catullus’, in Ingleheart, J. (ed.), Ancient Rome and the Construction of Western Homosexual Identities, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hijmans, B. 1978: ‘Significant names and their function in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses’, in Hijmans, B. and van der Paardt, R. (eds), Aspects of Apuleius’ “Golden Ass”, Groningen, 107–22Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 2006: ‘Venus, Varro and the vates: toward the limits of etymologizing interpretation’, Dictynna 3, 1–19Google Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (ed.) 2007: Fragments of Roman Poetry c. 60 BC–AD 20 (FRP), OxfordGoogle Scholar
Holzberg, N. 2000: ‘Lesbia, the poet and the two faces of Sappho: “womanufacture” in Catullus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 46, 28–44Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. 1931: ‘Praefanda’, Hermes 66, 402–12 (reprint in Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F. R. D. (eds), The Classical Papers of A. E. Housman, vol. III, Cambridge (1972), 1175–84)Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2010: A Commentary on Ovid, Tristia, Book 2, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Irwin, E. 1998: ‘Biography, fiction, and the Archilochean ainos’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 118, 177–83Google Scholar
Janka, M. 1997: Ovid Ars Amatoria, Buch 2. Kommentar, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Kajanto, I. 1965: The Latin Cognomina, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
Leary, T. J. 1996: Martial Book XIV: The Apophoreta, LondonGoogle Scholar
Masson, O. 1949: ‘Sur un papyrus contenant des fragments d'Hipponax’, Revue des Études Grecques 62, 314–15Google Scholar
Masson, O. 1962: Les fragments du poète Hipponax, ParisGoogle Scholar
Mau, A. 1901: ‘Cognomen’, RE 4, 225–30Google Scholar
McCartney, E. S. 1919: ‘Puns and plays on proper names’, Classical Journal 14, 343–58Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, C. J. 1907: Studies in the Word-Play in Plautus, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
Michalopoulos, A. N. 1996: ‘Some etymologies of proper names in Catullus’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 9, 75–81Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, A. N. 1999: ‘Etymologising on common nouns in Catullus’, Emerita 67, 127–45Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, A. N. 2001: Ancient Etymologies in Ovid's Metamorphoses: a Commented Lexicon, LeedsGoogle Scholar
Miles, S. forthcoming: Strattis, Tragedy, and Comedy unpub. PhD dissertation, Nottingham UniversityGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. G. 1974: ‘Ipsithilla or Ipsicilla? Catullus, c. 32 again’, Glotta 52, 233–6Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B. 1958: C. Valerii Catulli Carmina, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1979: The Best of the Achaeans, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
Nappa, C. 1999: ‘Catullus 59: Rufa among the graves’, Classical Philology 94, 329–35Google Scholar
Neudling, C. L. 1955: A Prosopography to Catullus, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Newman, J. K. 1990: Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility, HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1961: In L. Pisonem Oratio, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1995: Collected Papers on Latin Literature, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Opelt, I. 1965: Die Lateinischen Schimpfwoerter und Verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
Parker, H. N. 2000: ‘Flaccus’, Classical Quarterly 50, 455–62Google Scholar
Pedrick, V. 1993: ‘The abusive address and the audience in Catullan poems’, Helios 20.2, 173–96Google Scholar
Quinn, K. 1973: Catullus: The Poems, BristolGoogle Scholar
Randall, J. G. 1979: ‘Mistresses’ pseudonyms in Latin elegy’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 4, 27–35Google Scholar
Rankin, H. D. 1976: ‘Catullus and incest’, Eranos 74, 113–21Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1983: The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor, New Haven/LondonGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 1988a: Old Comedy and the Iambographic Tradition, APA American Classical Studies 19, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 1988b: ‘Hipponax, Boupalos, and the conventions of the Psogos’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 118, 29–41Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1960: ‘The names in Horace's Satires’, Classical Quarterly n.s. 10.2, 161–78Google Scholar
Scott, W. C. 1969: ‘Catullus and Cato (c. 56)’, Classical Philology 64.1, 24–9Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 1993: ‘Perillus at Tomis’, in Jocelyn, H. D. (ed.), Tria Lustra: Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent, Liverpool Classical Papers 3, Liverpool, 301–10Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 1997: ‘Introduction: Quod multo fit aliter in Graecia …’, in Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. (eds), Roman Sexualities, Princeton, 3–25Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. 2003: Catullus in Verona: a Reading of the Elegaic Libellus, Poems 65–116, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J. M. 1978: ‘The significant name in Lucretius’, Classical World 72, 227–30Google Scholar
Spies, A. 1930: Militat omnis amans. Ein Beitrag zur Bildersprache der antiken Erotik, unpub. dissertation, University of TübingenGoogle Scholar
Stehle, E. 1999: Review of Gerber, D. (ed.), A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets (1997), in Phoenix 53, 163–6Google Scholar
Stroh, W. 1979: ‘Ovids Liebeskunst und die Ehegesetze des Augustus’, Gymnasium 86, 323–52Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939: The Roman Revolution, LondonGoogle Scholar
Syndikus, H. P. 1990: Catull: eine Interpretation, (3 vols), DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Usener, H. 1901: ‘Italische Volksjustiz’, Rheinisches Museum 56, 1–28Google Scholar
Watson, L. C. 1995: ‘Horace's Epodes: the impotence of iambos?’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace. A Bimillenary Celebration, Oxford, 188–202Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1974: Studies in Greek Elegy and Iambus, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. A. 2010: Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity (2nd edn), New York/OxfordGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1985: Catullus and his World: a Reappraisal, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. 2001: Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood, CambridgeGoogle Scholar