Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:37:00.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

True History and False History in Classical Antiquity*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Emilio Gabba
Emilio Gabba
Affiliation:
University of Pavia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Like all works of literature, works of history end up sooner or later with a readership quite different from that envisaged or hoped for by their authors. A subtle and polemical work such as The Gallic War of Caesar has become a standard text for teaching Latin in the early years of secondary education, as have the tender and sophisticated elegies of Tibullus and Propertius. In Italy, the unpopularity of ‘The Betrothed’ by A. Manzoni, a finely ironical and difficult but rewarding novel, is the result of the distaste or boredom experienced by children forced to read it at school.

A similar fate has dogged Thucydides. As T. P. Wiseman has recently emphasized, Thucydides and Polybius, precisely because their historical method is close to our own, are regarded as the paradigms against which to judge ancient historical writing—quite wrongly. In fact they are untypical and exceptional; and one has moreover to ask to what extent they were even properly understood in antiquity. In a famous chapter near the beginning of his work (1. 22. 4), Thucydides proudly distances it from that of Herodotus, though without naming him: his own history is not designed for passing appreciation, but is to be of permanent value. Because human nature is always the same, a critical record of past events will present analogies and resemblances when compared with future developments. Knowledge of the past is thus useful, because it improves ones judgment and understanding and even suggests how to behave in situations in which one may find oneself.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 71 , November 1981 , pp. 50 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Emilio Gabba 1981. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Clio's Cosmetics. Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature (1979) 149 ff. and passim.

2 Canfora, L., ‘II “ciclo” storico,’ Belfagor 26 (1971) 653–70Google Scholar.

3 Histoire de l'éducation dans l'Antiquité (1965) 245 ff., 405–406. Further bibliography in Virgilio, B., Studi Classici e Orientali 29 (1979) 133Google Scholar n. 5.

4 Manganaro, G., Parola del Passato 29 (1974) 389–409,Google Scholar now in Alföldi, A., Römische Frühgeschichte (1977) 83–96Google Scholar.

5 Nilsson, M. P., Die hellenistische Schule (1955) 96Google Scholar.

6 Momigliano, A., ‘Polybius' Reappearance in Western Europe’, in Polybe (Fondation Hardt, Entretiens sur l'Antiquité Classique xx) (1974) 347–72Google Scholar ( = Sesto Contribute I, 103–23).

7 History of Federal Government in Greece and Italy (1893) 175 ff.

8 Wiseman, , Clio's Cosmetics, 143 ffGoogle Scholar.

9 Plut., De Is. et Osir. 24, 360b; Braun, M., History and Romance in Graeco-Oriental Literature (1938)Google Scholar.

10 Perry, E., The Ancient Romances (1967) 63Google Scholar.

11 The texts are collected by Giannini, A., Paradoxographorum Graecorum Reliquiae (n.d. but 1967)Google Scholar. See also id, ‘Studi sulla paradossografia greca 1. Da Omero a Callimaco: motivi e forme del meraviglioso’, Rend. Ist. Lombardo, Cl. Lettere 97 (1963) 247–66; ‘II. Da Callimaco all'età imperiale: la letteratura paradossografica, Acme 17 (1964) 99–140Google Scholar. Ziegler, RE, s.v. Paradoxographoi, 1139 ff., remains fundamental.

12 Tomberg, K.-H., Die καινὴ lστορία des Ptolemaios Chennos (1968)Google Scholar.

13 Histoire de l'éducation 254; 409.

14 Jacoby, F., ‘Die Überlieferung von Ps. Plutarchs Parallela Minora und die Schwindelautoren’, Mnemosyne, ser. III, 8 (1940) 73–144Google Scholar.

15 Sex. Emp., Adv. Math. I 253–5; 258–61 (reproducing arguments of Asclepiades of Myrleia): Mazzarino, S., Il Pensiero Storico Classico, I (1960) 486–494;Google Scholar for a different view. Slater, W. J., ‘Asclepiades and History’, Greek Roman and Byzant. Studies 13 (1972) 317–33Google Scholar. Cf. also Rhet. ad Her. 1 12–16.

16 Historia Vera I 1–4.

17 Epist. 89, 301 b-c.

18 The Greeks and the Irrational (1951) 245 ff.

19 De ant. orat. I 3, 1.

20 Söder, R., Die Apokryphen-Geschichte und die romanhafte Literatur der Antike (1932)Google Scholar.

21 Ruggini, L. Cracco, in La Storiografia ecclesiastica nella Tarda Antichità (1980) 186 n. 51Google Scholar.

22 Décadence romaine ou Antiquité tardive? (1977).

23 Pfeiffer, R., Callimachus I (1949) 339;Google Scholar 404 (fr. 580).

24 Polyb. VI 5. 5–6.

25 Capelle, RE Suppl. IV, s.v. Erdbebenforschung, 344–74.

26 Strabo 1 3. 17 (Demetrius Scepsius); 20 (Demetrius Call. = FGrHist 85 F 6).

27 E.g. Strabo I 3. 10; 3. 16 ff.; VI 1.6; a. 10–11. Strabo adopts the views of Posidonius.

28 Oeuvres complètes III, 168–9 (Ed. Pleiade).

29 Caes., de bell. Gall. VI 13, 11–12.

30 Thuc. 1. 4; 7. 2; 9. 3–4; 15. 1; Diod. v 13. 4.

31 Hist. Roma. Praef. 16–18.

32 Xenoph., Poroi I 6–7.

33 Ps. Xenoph. II 14–16.

34 Scheliha, R. v., Die Wassergrenze im Altertum (1931)Google Scholar.

35 Vidal-Naquet, P., ‘Athènes et l'Atlantide. Structure et signification d'un mythe platonicien’, Revue Etudes Grecques 77 (1964) 420–44Google Scholar.

36 Mossé, Cl., ‘Les utopies égalitaires à l'époque hellenistique’, Revue Hist. 241 (1969) 297–308;Google ScholarFerguson, J., Utopias of the Classical World, (1975) 73 ff.; 104 ff.; 122 ff.Google Scholar; Bertelli, L., ‘II modello della società rurale nell'utopia grecà, in Studi sull'utopia raccolti da L. Firpo (1977) 5–30Google Scholar.

37 Diod. VI 1 (FGrHist 63 F 2); 41–6 (FGrHist 63 F 3). H. Braunert, ‘Die heilige Insel des Euhemerus in der Diodor-Überlieferung’, Rh. Museum 108 (1965) 255–68.

38 Diod. II 55–60.

39 Diod. III 53. 4–6 (FGrHist 32 F 7); 68. 5. 69. 4 (FGrHist 32 F 8).

40 For a discussion see Bömer, F., Untersuchungen über die Religion der Sklaven in Griechenland und Rom III (1961) 396–415Google Scholar (Ak. Wiss. Mainz, Geistes-und Sozialwiss. Kl. 1961, Nr. 4).

41 Diod. 11 47 (FGrHist 264 F 7); cf. Aelian., Nat. Anim. II, 1 (FGrHist 264 F 12).

42 Pöhlmann, R. v., Geschichte der Sozialen Frage und des Sozialismus in der antiken Welt, I 3, 36Google Scholar ff.

43 Plin. N.H. x 4; Mommsen, Ges. Schr. VII 72–6.

44 Peter, HRR II, cxxx–cxxxii; 101–107; Kappel macher, RE s.v. Licinius, nr. 116, 440–5.

45 Plut., Sert. VIII 2–5, IX 1.

46 Ed. Fraenkel, , Horace (1966) 52 ffGoogle Scholar.

47 C. G. Starr, ‘The Roman Emperor and the King of Ceylon’, Class. Phil. 51 (1956) 27–30 (= Essays in Ancient History (1979) 258–261).

48 Tresp, A., Die Fragmente der Griechischen Kultschriftsteller (1914) ( RVV, XV 1)Google Scholar.

49 Pasquali, G., ‘Die schriftstellerische Form des Pausanias’, Hermes 48 (1913) 161–223Google Scholar.

50 E.g. 141. 2 and v 10. 7. Cf. S. Reinach, Daremberg-Saglio, Dict. Ant. 11, 885–6, s.v. Exegetai.

51 De re rust. I 2. 1; 11. 12; 69. 2–3.

52 Liv. VII 3. 5–7: Heurgon, J., ‘L. Cincius et la loi du clavis annalis’, Athenaeum 42 (1964) 432–7Google Scholar.

53 Bona, F., Contributo allo studio della composizione del ‘de verborum significatu’ de Verrio Flacco (1964) 125Google Scholar.

54 E.g.: 1 25. 14; 26. 13–15; 36. 5; 48. 6–7; II 10. 12; 13. 5; 13. 11; 14. 9; 40. 12; 41. 10–11.

55 The principal texts are in Valentini, R. and Zuechetti, G., Codice Topografico della Città di Roma II (1942)Google Scholar; in (1946); this volume contains at 93 ff. the earliest edition of the Mirabilia.

56 For the development of this literature in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Hay, D., Annalists and Historians (1974) 135Google Scholar.

57 Schramm, P. E., Kaiser, Rom und Renovatio II (1929) 45–6; 105–11;Google ScholarValentini-Zucchetti, , Codice Topografico III, 3Google Scholar ff.; Weissthanner, A., ‘Mittelalterliche Rompilgerführer. Zur Üeberlieferung der Mirabilia und der Indulgentiae urbis Romae’, Archivalische Zeitschrift 49 (1954) 39–64Google Scholar.

58 Rosenthal, J. T., ‘Bede's Use of Miracles in “The Ecclesiastical History”’, Traditio 31 (1975) 328–35;Google ScholarWard, B., ‘Miracles and History. A Reconsideration of the Miracle Stories used by Bede’, in Bonnet, G. (ed.), Famulus Christi (1976) 70–6Google Scholar; Colgrave, B., in Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People, edited by B. C., and Mynors, R. A. B. (1979) xxxiv–xxxviGoogle Scholar.