Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:46:03.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Römische Gebalke: herausgegeben Im Auftrage Der Toebelmann-Stiftung Der Heidelberger Akademie Der Wissenschaften von Ernst Fiechter und Christian Hülsen. Von Fritz Toebelmann. Erste Teil. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 1923. 34 × 25 cm. Pp. iv + 142. With an Atlas of 24 plates, 65 × 48 cm.

Review products

Römische Gebalke: herausgegeben Im Auftrage Der Toebelmann-Stiftung Der Heidelberger Akademie Der Wissenschaften von Ernst Fiechter und Christian Hülsen. Von Fritz Toebelmann. Erste Teil. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 1923. 34 × 25 cm. Pp. iv + 142. With an Atlas of 24 plates, 65 × 48 cm.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Thomas Ashby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Recent Publications
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 1-2 , November 1923 , pp. 201 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Thomas Ashby 1923. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 202 note 1 J.R.I.B.A., Ser. iii, xxix (1921–1922), p. 558Google Scholar, fig. 6.

page 202 note 2 It is much to be hoped that the third edition of Hülsen's invaluable work on the Roman Forum will soon be published and such corrections as this included in it.

page 202 note 3 I may note that the statement on p. 16, that a piece of the cornice must have been known before 1500, rests on a confusion between the first and the second hand of the so-called Coner sketch-book (P.B.S.R.` ii, f. 104). The drawing in question is by the latter—a copyist who worked for Cassiano dal Pozzo in the seventeenth century (ibid, vi, 187).

page 202 note 4 I may note here that fig, 39 seems to have been omitted and that on p. 43, n. 1, the reference to Coner should be 126b, not 105d, which is a cornice.

page 202 note 5 Oxyrhyncus Papyri, iii, p. 39.

page 203 note 1 Lib. Pontif. (ed. Duchesne) vol. ii, p. 108, l. 20, ‘huius beati tempore praesulis terre motus in urbe Roma per indictionem factus est X (i.e. before August 31, 847, Leo having become Pope on April 10), ita ut omnia elementa concussa viderentur ab omnibus.’