Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:41:11.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New institutional economics: insights and doubts - G. DARI-MATTIACCI, and D. KEHOE, eds. 2020. Roman Law and Economics, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Vol. 1, pp. xx+345, figs. 6, tables 6; vol. 2, pp. xx+435, figs. 12, tables 10. ISBN 978-0-19-878720-4 and 978-0-19-878721-1.

Review products

G. DARI-MATTIACCI, and D. KEHOE, eds. 2020. Roman Law and Economics, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Vol. 1, pp. xx+345, figs. 6, tables 6; vol. 2, pp. xx+435, figs. 12, tables 10. ISBN 978-0-19-878720-4 and 978-0-19-878721-1.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2022

Richard Saller
Richard Saller*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of Roman Archaeology , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , December 2022 , pp. 1076 - 1083
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crook, J. A. 1990. “‘His’ and ‘hers’: What degree of financial responsibility did husband and wife have for the matrimonial home and their life in common, in a Roman marriage?” In Parenté et stratégies familiales dans l'antiquité romaine, ed. Andreau, J. and Bruhns, H., 153–72. Rome: Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar
Hollander, D. 2022. “Opaque, inconsistent, and unfair. Some remarks on the burden of Roman taxation during the Principate.” In Taxation, Economy, and Revolt in Ancient Rome, Galilee, and Egypt, ed. Blanton IV, T., Choi, A., and Liu, J., 59–71. Abingdon, UK, and NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1983. Death and Renewal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malanima, P. 2013. “Energy consumption in the Roman world.” In The Ancient Mediterranean Environment Between Science and History, ed. Harris, W., 13–36. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, S. 2007. “‘Whatever is, is right’? Economic institutions in pre-industrial Europe.” Economic History Review 60: 649–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saller, R. 1994. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saller, R. 2022. Pliny's Roman Economy: Natural History, Innovation, and Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2014. “The shape of the Roman world.” JRA 27: 7–32.Google Scholar
Shaw, B. 2019. “Did the Romans have a future?” JRS 109: 1–26.Google Scholar
Temin, P. 2006. “The economy of the Early Roman Empire.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, no. 1: 133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, P. 2013. The Roman Market Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Verboven, K. 2002. The Economy of Friends. Economic Aspects of Amicitia and Patronage in the Late Republic. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar