Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:05:37.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes Toward Individuals With Disabilities: The Effects of Age, Gender, and Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

Jason J. Barr  and
Kristi Bracchitta
Jason J. Barr*
Affiliation:
Monmouth University, USA
Kristi Bracchitta
Affiliation:
College of Mount Saint Vincent, USA
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Jason J. Barr, PhD, Associate Professor & Chair, Educational Leadership, School Counseling & Special Education, Monmouth University, 400 Cedar Avenue, West Long Branch, NJ 07764, United States. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Attitudes toward individuals with disabilities are influenced by the amount of contact one has with such individuals. This research investigated if the relationship a person has with individuals with disabilities is associated with positive attitudes more so than mere contact with such individuals. Increased contact with friends with disabilities and activities with individuals with disabilities were associated with more positive altitudes. Contact with relatives and classmates with a disability was not associated with more positive attitudes. Age and gender were found to moderate these relationships. Contact with friends with disabilities increased positive attitudes for younger but not older participants. Contact with classmates with disabilities decreased positive attitudes for males but not females. This research can help us better understand disability-related bias.

Keywords

disabilitiesattitudesgender differencesintergroup contact theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 3 , December 2012 , pp. 10 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, S., & McConkey, R. (2006). The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 275–287.Google Scholar
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.J., & Antonak, R.F. (1992). The influence of attitudes and contact on reactions to persons with physical and speech disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35, 240–248.Google Scholar
Antonak, R. (1982). Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes toward Disabled Persons. The Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13, 22–29.Google Scholar
Antonak, R., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.Google Scholar
Beattie, J., Anderson, R., & Antonak, R. (1997). Modifying attitudes of prospective educators toward students with disabilities and their integration into the regular classroom. Journal of Psychology, 131, 245–259.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cortina, J.M., & Landis, R.S. (2009). When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when larger effect sizes don't. In Lance, C.E. & Vandenberg, R.J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (pp. 287–336). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deal, M. (2003). Disabled people's attitudes toward other impairment groups: A hierarchy of impairments. Disability and Society, 18, 897–910. doi: 10.1080/0968759032000127317Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (2006). Prosocial behaviour. In Bear, G.G. & Minke, K.M. (Eds.), Children's needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 313–324). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C.J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 532–538. doi: 10.1037/a0015808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichten, C.S., Schipper, F., & Cutler, N. (2005). Does volunteering with children affect attitudes toward adults with disabilities? A prospective study of unequal contact. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 164–173. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findler, L., Vilchinsky, N., & Werner, S. (2007). The multidimensional attitudes scale toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50, 166–176. doi: 10.1177/00343552070500030401.Google Scholar
Hampton, N.Z., & Xiao, F. (2007). Attitudes toward people with developmental disabilities in Chinese and American students: The role of cultural values, contact, and knowledge. Journal of Rehabilitation, 73, 23–32.Google Scholar
Harper, D.C., & Peterson, D.B. (2001). Children in the Philippines: Attitudes toward visible physical impairment. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 38, 566–576. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0566:COTPAT>2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
Hunt, B., & Hunt, C. (2000). Attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison of undergraduate rehabilitation and business majors. Rehabilitation Education, 14, 269–283.Google Scholar
Hyde, J.S. (2006). Half the human experience: The psychology of women. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jahoda, A., & Markova, I. (2004). Coping with social stigma: People with intellectual disabilities moving from institutions and family home. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48, 719–729.Google Scholar
Kalyva, E., & Agaliotis, I. (2009). Con contact affect Greek children's understanding of and attitudes towards peers with physical disabilities? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24, 213–220.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, J.B, Turner, R.N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2005). Intergroup contact: When does it work, and why? In Dovidio, J.F., John, F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L.A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 278–292). Malden, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Laws, G., & Kelly, E. (2005). The attitudes and friendship intentions of children in United Kingdom mainstream schools towards peers with physical or intellectual disabilities. Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 2, 79–99. doi: 10.1080/10349120500086298Google Scholar
Loo, R. (2000). Attitudes of management undergraduates toward persons with disabilities: A need for change. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46, 288–295. doi:10.1080/10349120500086298Google Scholar
Makas, E. (1993). Getting in touch: The relationship between contact with and attitudes towards people with disabilities. In Nagler, M. (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (pp. 121–136). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.Google Scholar
McCaughey, T.J., & Strohmer, D.C. (2005). Prototypes as an indirect measure of attitudes toward disability groups. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48, 89–99. doi: 10.1177/00343552050480020301Google Scholar
McDougall, J., DeWit, D.J., King, G., Miller, L.T., & Killip, S. (2004). High school-aged youths’ attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: The role of school and student interpersonal factors. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 51, 287–313. doi: 10.1080/1034912042000259242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, J.L., Feyes, K.J., & Saucier, D.A. (2010). Contact and knowledge as predictors of attitudes toward individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 579–590.Google Scholar
Meyer, L., Gouvier, W.D., Duke, M., & Advokat, C. (2001). Influence of social context on reported attitudes of nondisabled students toward students with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 50–52.Google Scholar
Mpofu, E. (2003). Enhancing social acceptance of early adolescents with physical disabilities: Effects of role salience, peer interaction, and academic support interventions. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 50, 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowicki, E.A., & Sandieson, R. (2002). A meta-analysis of school-aged children's attitudes towards persons with physical and intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 49, 243–265. doi: 10.1080/1034912022000007270Google Scholar
Nowicki, E.A. (2006). A cross-sectional multivariate analysis of children's attitudes towards disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 335–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00781.xGoogle Scholar
Panek, P.E., & Smith, J.L. (2005). Assessment of terms to describe mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 565–576. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2004.11.009Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751Google Scholar
Pruett, S.R., Lee, E.J., Chan, F., Wang, M.H., & Lane, F.J. (2008). Dimensionality of the Contact with Disabled Persons Scale: Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Rehabilitation Counseling, 51, 210–221. doi: 10.1177/0034355207311310Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M.J., Hoveland, C.L., McGuire, W.J., Abelson, R.P., & Brehm, J.W. (1960). Attitude organization and change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seo, W., & Chen, R.K. (2009). Attitudes of college students toward people with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 40, 3–8.Google Scholar
Sharp, M., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Impact of contact effects on attitudes and contact: Evidence of the validity of self-reports of intergroup contact. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 17, 5–15.Google Scholar
Smart, J. (2008). Disability, society, and the individual (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: ProEd.Google Scholar
Tamm, M., & Prellwitz, M. (2001). ‘If I had a friend in a wheelchair’: Children's thoughts on disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27, 223–240.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (2001). The multidimensional character of biased perceptions of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67, 3–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. (2008). Computing and interpreting effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. In Osborne, J.W. (Ed.) Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 246–262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, R. (1995). The effects of gender and type of disability on attitudes of children toward peers with physical disabilities. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 29, 219–227.Google Scholar
Yuker, H. (1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 9, 3–22.Google Scholar