Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:44:38.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why Find My Own When I Can Take Yours?: The Quality of Relationships That Arise From Successful Mate Poaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2018

Charlene F. Belu*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Lucia F. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Charlene Belu, Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, CanadaE3B 5A3. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Mate poaching occurs when a person attracts another, whom he or she knows is already in an exclusive relationship, into a sexual or romantic relationship. Mate poaching is involved in the evolution of many relationships. Yet, little is known about the quality of these relationships. We examined relationship quality between individuals whose relationships were formed via mate poaching versus not (i.e., a relationship formed serially without overlap with another relationship). We compared ratings of quality from the perspectives of poachers, poached, and co-poached individuals. Adult participants (n = 660) in a romantic relationship responded to questions assessing relationship quality. Those in relationships formed from poaching rated their relationships as lower in relationship satisfaction, commitment and trust, and higher in jealousy, and had higher rates of romantic and sexuality infidelity in their current relationship compared to individuals in non-poached relationships. Those who were poached from an existing relationship rated their current relationship as lower in commitment than did those who poached their current partner into a relationship. The study also provides first insights regarding relationship quality for those who identify as co-poached. We discuss these findings in terms of implications for understanding how relationships are formed and the qualities of those that endure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E.S., Rhoades, G.K., Stanley, S.M., Markman, H.J., Williams, T., Melton, J., & Clements, M.L. (2008). Premarital precursors of marital infidelity. Family Process, 47, 243259. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00251.xGoogle Scholar
Amato, P.R., & Previti, D. (2003). People's reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 602626. doi:10.1177/0192513X03254507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469480. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R.S., & Knack, J.M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 4564. doi:10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Mate-poaching and mating success in humans. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 6583. doi:10.1556/JEP.11.2013.2.2Google Scholar
Baucom, D.H., Snyder, D.K., & Gordon, K.C. (2009). Helping couples get past the affair: A clinician's guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Beasley, T.M., & Schumacker, R.E. (1995). Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 7993. doi:10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrend, T.S., Sharek, D.J., Meade, A.W., & Wiebe, E.N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 800813. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0Google Scholar
Boekhout, B.A., Hendrick, S.S., & Hendrick, C. (2003). Exploring infidelity: Developing the relationships issues scale. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 8, 283306. doi:10.1080/15325020305882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D.M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291317. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(88)90010-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D.M. (1990). The evolution of anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 196201. doi:10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.196Google Scholar
Buss, D.M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D.M. (2013). Sexual jealousy. Psihologijske teme, 22, 155182.Google Scholar
Buss, D.M., Larsen, R.J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.xGoogle Scholar
Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346361. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.346Google Scholar
Byers, E.S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 113118. doi:10.1080/00224490509552264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, E.S., & Demmons, S. (1999). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 180189. doi:10.1080/0022449990955198zGoogle Scholar
Chao, J.K., Lin, Y.C., Ma, M.C., Lai, C.J., Ku, Y.C., Kuo, W.H., & Chao, I.C. (2011). Relationship among sexual desire, sexual satisfaction, and quality of life in middle-aged and older adults. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 37, 386403. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2011.607051Google Scholar
Cherlin, A. (2009). The Marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and family in America today. New York, NY: Random House, Inc.Google Scholar
Dandurand, C., & Lafontaine, M.F. (2014). Jealousy and couple satisfaction: A romantic attachment perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 2, 154173. doi:10.1080/01494929.2013.879549Google Scholar
Davies, A.P., Shackelford, T.K., & Hass, R.G. (2007). When a ‘poach’ is not a poach: Re-defining human mate poaching and re-estimating its frequency. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 702716. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9158-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, P., Barelds, D.P., & Groothof, H.A. (2013). Jealousy in response to online and offline infidelity: The role of sex and sexual orientation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 328336. doi:10.1111/sjop.12055Google Scholar
Drigotas, S.M., Safstrom, C.A., & Gentilia, T. (1999). An investment model prediction of dating infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 509524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ein-Dor, T., Perry-Paldi, A., Hirschberger, G., Birnbaum, G.E., & Deutsch, D. (2015). Coping with mate poaching: Gender differences in detection of infidelity-related threats. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 1724. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.08.002Google Scholar
Elphinston, R.A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631635. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 111. doi:10.3758/BF03203630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2013). G*Power Version 3.1.7 [computer software]. Uiversität Kiel, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.gpower.hhu.de/Google Scholar
Fields, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Foster, J.D., Jonason, P.K., Shrira, I., Campbell, W.K., Shiverdecker, L.K., & Varner, S.C. (2014). What do you get when you make somebody else's partner your own? An analysis of relationships formed via mate poaching. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 7890. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.008Google Scholar
Garcia-Perez, M.A., & Nunez-Anton, V. (2003). Cellwise residual analysis in two-way contingency tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 825839. doi:10.1177/0013164403251280Google Scholar
Goodman, J.K., Cryder, C.E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753Google Scholar
Hall, J.H., & Fincham, F.D. (2009). Psychological distress: Precursor or consequence of dating infidelity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 143159. doi:10.1177/0146167208327189Google Scholar
Hauser, D.J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 400407. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0578-zGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J.G., & Rempel, J.K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 187220). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Impett, E.A., Beals, K.P., & Peplau, L.A. (2001). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20, 312326. doi:10.1007/s12144-001-1014-3Google Scholar
Johnson, D.J., & Rusbult, C.E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., & Gracanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psihologijske Teme, 2, 277296.Google Scholar
Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., Schmitt, D.P., & Grundler, P. (2015). Personality and mate poaching experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 712. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.048Google Scholar
Lampard, R. (2014). Stated reasons for relationship dissolution in Britain: Marriage and cohabitation compared. European Sociological Review, 30, 315328. doi:10.1093/esr/jct034Google Scholar
Larzelere, R.E., & Huston, T.L. (1980). The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 595604. doi:10.2307/351903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrance, K., & Byers, E.S. (1992). Development of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 1, 123128.Google Scholar
Lawrance, K., & Byers, E.S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267285. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.xGoogle Scholar
Le, B., & Agnew, C.R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta–analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 3757. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00035Google Scholar
Le, B., Dove, N.L., Agnew, C.R., Korn, M.S., & Mutso, A.A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta‐analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377390. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01285.xGoogle Scholar
Lydon, J.E., Menzies-Toman, D., Burton, K., & Bell, C. (2008). If-then contingencies and the differential effects of the availability of an attractive alternative on relationship maintenance for men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 5065. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.50Google Scholar
Maddox Shaw, A.M., Rhoades, G.K., Allen, E.S., Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. (2013). Predictors of extradyadic sexual involvement in unmarried opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 598610. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.666816Google Scholar
Maner, J.K., Gailliot, M.T., Rouby, D.A., & Miller, S.L. (2007). Can't take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389401. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.389Google Scholar
Mattingly, B.A., Clark, E.M., Weidler, D.J., Bullock, M., Hackathorn, J., & Blankmeyer, K. (2011). Sociosexual orientation, commitment, and infidelity: A mediation analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 222226. doi:10.1080/00224540903536162Google Scholar
Mattingly, B.A., Wilson, K., Clark, E.M., Bequette, A.W., & Weidler, D.J. (2010). Foggy faithfulness: Relationship quality, religiosity, and the perceptions of dating infidelity scale in an adult sample. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 14651480. doi:10.1177/0192513X10362348Google Scholar
Miller, R.S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758Google Scholar
Miller, S.L., & Maner, J.K. (2009). Sex differences in response to sexual versus emotional infidelity: The moderating role of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 287291. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.013Google Scholar
Neal, A.M., & Lemay, E.P. Jr (2014). How partners’ temptation leads to their heightened commitment: The interpersonal regulation of infidelity threats. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 938957. doi:10.1177/0265407513512745Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, S.M., & Wong, P.T. (1989). Multidimensional jealousy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 181196. doi:10.1177/026540758900600203Google Scholar
Previti, D., & Amato, P.R. (2004). Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 217230. doi:10.1177/0265407504041384Google Scholar
Rauer, A.J., Pettit, G.S., Lansford, J.E., Bates, J.E., & Dodge, K.A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49, 21592171. doi:10.1037/a0031845Google Scholar
Rodriguez, L.M., Dibello, A.M., Øverup, C.S., & Neighbors, C. (2015). The price of distrust: Trust, anxious attachment, jealousy, and partner abuse. Partner Abuse, 6, 298319. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.6.3.298Google Scholar
Rusbult, C.E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 5378. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4Google Scholar
Rusbult, C.E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101Google Scholar
Rusbult, C.E., Agnew, C.R., & Arriaga, X.B. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In Van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., & Higgins, E.T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (vol. 2, pp. 218231). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C.E., Martz, J.M., & Agnew, C.R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357387. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D.P., & Buss, D.M. (2000). Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the Big Five? Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 141177. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2267Google Scholar
Schmitt, D.P., & Buss, D.M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D.P., & International Sexuality Description Project (ISDP). (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person's partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 560584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.560Google Scholar
Shackelford, T.K., LeBlanc, G.J., & Drass, E. (2000). Emotional reactions to infidelity. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 643659. doi:10.1080/02699930050117657Google Scholar
Sharpsteen, D.J., & Kirkpatrick, L.A. (1997). Romantic jealousy and adult romantic attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 627640. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.627Google Scholar
Simpson, J.A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00517.xGoogle Scholar
Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Individual differences in mate poaching: An examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 533542. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9974-yGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MN: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Tafoya, M.A., & Spitzberg, B.H. (2007). The dark side of infidelity: Its nature, prevalence, and communicative functions. In Spitzberg, B.H. & Cupach, W.R. (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 201242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thompson, A.E., & O'Sullivan, L.F. (2016). Drawing the line: The development of a comprehensive assessment of infidelity judgments. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 910926. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1062840Google Scholar
Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage & Family, 62, 4862. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00048.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vannier, S.A., & O'Sullivan, L.F. (2017). Great expectations: Examining the unmet romantic expectations and dating relationship outcomes using an investment model framework. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0265407517703492Google Scholar
Vater, A., & Schröder‐Abé, M. (2015). Explaining the link between personality and relationship satisfaction: Emotion regulation and interpersonal behaviour in conflict discussions. European Journal of Personality, 29, 201215. doi:10.1002/per.1993Google Scholar