Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:23:43.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attachment and Emotion Transmission Within Romantic Relationships: Merging Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Ashley K. Randall  and
Emily A. Butler
Ashley K. Randall*
Affiliation:
Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Emily A. Butler
Affiliation:
Department of Family Studies and Human Development, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona, USA
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Ashley K. Randall, Counseling & Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, 446 Payne Hall, Tempe, Arizona 85287-0811, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The attachment system is responsible for emotional-motivational bonding with others and is associated with individual emotion regulation strategies (avoidance-disengagement; anxiety-hypervigilance); however, little is known how these individual differences in emotion regulation strategies influence partners’ interpersonal emotional experiences. Prior research examining the link between individual differences in attachment avoidance and anxiety and emotional connectedness in couples has interestingly shown counter-intuitive effects of individual attachment styles on couples’ shared emotions, such that attachment anxiety was associated with the lowest levels of emotional synchrony (Butner, Diamond, & Hicks, 2007). These results beg for additional research on whether and how individual differences in attachment styles moderate the transmission of emotion between partners. Using daily diaries and second-by-second measures of emotional experience from 30 couples, it was hypothesised that couples high in attachment avoidance (disengagement) would show lower levels, whereas couples high in attachment anxiety (hypervigilance) would show higher levels of emotion transmission. Results were counter to our predictions; attachment avoidance increased — and attachment anxiety decreased — emotion transmission between partners. Findings suggest attachment dynamics may not have the same effect on couples’ joint emotional functioning in a dyadic context as they do on individuals’ emotional functioning.

Keywords

attachmentemotion transmissionromantic relationships
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 4 , 25 October 2013 , e10
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M.D., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In Kelley, H.H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J., Huston, T.L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, A., & Peterson, D.R. (Eds.), Close Relationships (pp. 110–168). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In Revenson, T., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burke, T.J., Randall, A.K., Corkery, S.A., Young, V.J., & Butler, E.A. (2012). ‘You're going to eat that?’ Relationship processes and conflict among mixed-weight couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29 (8), 1109–1130. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407512451199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, E.A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The ‘TIES’ that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367–393. doi:10.1177/1088868311411164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, E.A., & Randall, A.K. (2013). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 202–210. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451630Google Scholar
Butner, J., Diamond, L.M., & Hicks, A.M. (2007). Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 14, 431–455. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00164.xGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, J., & Berlin, L.J. (1994). The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child Development, 65, 971–981. doi: dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131298Google Scholar
Cook, W.L., & Kenny, D.A. (2005). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29 (2), 101–109. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405Google Scholar
Diamond, L.M., & Hicks, A.M. (2005). Attachment style, current relationship security, and negative emotions: The mediating role of physiological linkage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 499–518. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407505054520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L.M., Hicks, A.M., & Otter-Henderson, K.D. (2008). Every time you go away: Changes in affect, behavior, and physiology associated with travel-related separations from romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 358–403. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.385Google Scholar
Downey, G., Purdie, V., & Schaffer-Neitz, . (1999). Anger transmission from mother to child: A comparison of mothers in chronic pain and well mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 62–73. doi:dx.doi.org/10.2307/353883Google Scholar
Feeney, J. (1999). Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. (Eds.)., Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 355–377). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Feeney, J.A., Noller, P., & Callan, V.J. (1994). Attachment style, communcation and satisfaction in the early years of marriage. In Bartholomew, K. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Attachment process in adulthood (pp. 269–308). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Fraley, R.C., Heffernan, M.E., Vicary, A.M., & Brumbaugh, C.C. (2011). The Experiences in Close Relationships — Relationship Structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615–625. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022898Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. (1994). Emotion contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, B.M., & Johnson, K.R. (2009). Adult attachment and romantic partner preference: A review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 33–52. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407509345653Google Scholar
Kashy, D.A., Donnellan, M.B., Burt, S.A., & McGue, M. (2008). Growth curve models for indistinguishable dyads using multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling: The case of adolescent twins’ conflict with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 44 (2), 316–329. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.316Google Scholar
Johnson, S.M., & Greenberg, L.S. (1995). The Emotionally Focused Approach to problems in adult attachment. In Jacobson, N.S. & Gurman, A.S. (Eds.), The Clinical Handbook of Marital Therapy (2nd ed.), pp. 3–26. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data anlaysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Laurenceau, J.P., & Bolger, N. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19 (1), 86–97. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86Google Scholar
Larson, R.W., & Almeida, D.M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: A new paradigm for studying family process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 5–20. doi:dx.doi.org/10.2307/353879Google Scholar
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Levenson, R.W., & Gottman, J.M. (1983). Marital interactions: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587–597. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.45.3.587Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In Simpson, J.A. & Rholes, W.S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships. (pp. 143–165). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., Cowan, P.A., & Cowan, C.P. (2002). Attachment security in couple relationships: A systemic model and its implications for family dynamics. Family Process, 41, 405–434. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41309.xGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In Zanna, M.P. (Ed.), Advantages in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2005). Mental representations of attachment security: Theoretical foundation for a positive social psychology. In Baldwin, M.W. (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 233–266). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P.R., & Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation & Emotion, 27, 77–102.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pietromonaco, P.R., & Barrett, L.F. (1997). Working models of attachment and daily social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1409–1423. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1409Google Scholar
Pietromonaco, P.R., & Feldman Barett, L. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology,4, 155–175. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.4.2.155Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S.W., Brennan, R.T., & Barnett, R.C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161–174. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037//0893-3200.9.2.161Google Scholar
Rohrbaugh, M.J., & Shoham, V. (2011). Family consultation for couples coping with health problems: A social cybernetic approach. In Friedman, H.S. (Ed.), Handbook of health psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. (2004). SAS user's guide, version 9.2. Cary, NC: Author.Google Scholar
Saxbe, D., & Repetti, R.L. (2010). For better or worse? Coregulation of couples’ cortisol levels and mood states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (1), 92–103. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016959Google Scholar
Schoebi, D. (2008). The coregulation of daily affect in marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 22 (3), 595–604. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.595Google Scholar
Shaver, P.R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. In Perlman, D. & Jones, W. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 27–70). London: Kingsley.Google Scholar
Shaver, P.R., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Adult attachment strategies and the regulation of emotion. In Gross, J.J. (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp. 446–465). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J.A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 971–980. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.5.971Google Scholar
Thompson, A., & Bolger, N. (1999). Emotional transmission in couples under stress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 38–48. doi:dx.doi.org/10.2307/353881Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063Google Scholar
Wei, M., Russell, D.W., Mallincrokrodt, B., & Vogel, D.L. (2007). The experience in close relationship scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268041Google Scholar